Tag Archives: texas

Obama focus of KY Senate debate

(CNN) — President Barack Obama was a central theme of a televised debate Sunday between Kentucky’s two U.S. Senate candidates.

Rand Paul, the Tea Party backed Republican who beat a mainstream GOP opponent in the primary, accused Democratic nominee Jack Conway of hewing to Obama’s agenda at the risk of the nation’s economic stability.

“I think this election really is about the president’s agenda,” Paul said. “Do you support the president’s agenda or do you not support it? I think his agenda’s wrong for America. I will stand up against President Obama’s agenda. And I think that’s what people in Kentucky want.”

Conway, the state’s attorney general, said that while he agreed with some Obama policies including health care reform, he would be an independent voice looking out for Kentucky.

Asked about his campaign ads and reported comments depicting Paul as “crazy,” Conway said: “I’m not saying Dr. Paul is crazy. I think some of his ideas are out of the mainstream and they’re out of touch with the values of normal Kentuckians.”

The debate moderated by “FOX News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace included accusations by Paul that Conway flip-flopped on some issues, first backing and now questioning cap-and-trade energy legislation and the expiration of some Bush-era tax cuts.

Video: Obama: ‘We cannot sit this out’

RELATED TOPICS

Conway denied changing positions but made clear that he now was firmly in the moderate camp on some hot-button issues, for example insisting that all the tax cuts should be extended.

Obama wants to extend the tax cuts for the 98 percent of the country earning up to $200,000 individually or $250,000 as families, while returning to higher tax rates of the 1990s for the 2 percent making more money.

Republicans, along with some Democrats — including Conway — say all the tax cuts should be extended as the economy slowly recovers from the recession.

Conway accused Paul of being out of touch with Kentuckians by advocating policies that he said were out of the 1930s. He repeatedly cited Paul’s past suggestion of a $2,000 deductible for Medicare coverage and reducing the federal role in mine safety regulations as examples.

Polls show Conway may be starting to erode a big lead by Paul in the race to fill the seat held by retiring Republican Sen. Jim Bunning, a Hall of Fame baseball pitcher. The other senator– Minority Leader Mitch McConnell — holds the party’s highest post in the chamber.

Paul, an eye surgeon, is the son of Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who ran for the Republican nomination for president in 2008.

Obama focus of KY Senate debate

Rangel will ‘be glad to see what happens’ in ethics hearing

(CNN) — Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-New York, said Friday that he is taking the congressional ethics investigation now threatening to derail his career “one step at a time.”

“I’ll be glad to see what happens Thursday” when the House ethics subcommittee responsible for conducting formal hearings has its first organizational meeting, he said. “This thing is coming to a head.”

Rangel added, however, that “nobody in his right mind (would be) looking forward to something like this.”

Rangel recently stepped down as Ways and Means chairman following the announcement of a congressional investigation into several allegations, including failure to pay taxes on a home in the Dominican Republic.

The congressman has also admitted a failure to report several hundred thousand dollars in assets on federal disclosure forms.

In addition, he is under scrutiny for the purported misuse of a rent-controlled apartment for political purposes, as well as for allegedly preserving tax benefits for an oil-drilling company in exchange for donations to a project he supported at the City College of New York.

The House ethics committee previously admonished Rangel for violating rules on receiving gifts. Specifically, the committee found that Rangel violated House gift rules by accepting reimbursement payments for travel to conferences in the Caribbean in 2007 and 2008.

Rangel, who has served 20 consecutive terms in the House, has several challengers in his district’s Democratic congressional primary this year. Among those seeking to replace him is the son of the late congressman Adam Clayton Powell Jr., who was ousted by Rangel 40 years ago.

Rangel said Friday he wants “people to know who Charlie Rangel was, is, and is proud to be” before the September 14 primary. People should know “how awkward it has been for me to constantly” tell them to wait until the ethics investigation is over before commenting, he added.

It is tough not to respond to the “mean” things said about me, he declared.

“I won’t let you down,” he promised his constituents.

Rangel also said he had called MSNBC’s Luke Russert to apologize for his treatment of Russert during an exchange on Capitol Hill Thursday. Pressed by Russert on the possibility of losing his office, Rangel accused Russert of “trying to make a name” for himself, and said the young journalist was asking “dumb questions.”

“It doesn’t really sound like NBC asking these dumb questions,” Rangel said. “It just shows what happened to a channel that did have some respect.”

The adjudicatory subcommittee that will consider Rangel’s case is composed of four Democrats and four Republicans, according to an ethics committee document.

It says Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-California, is the panel’s chairperson.

Other Democratic members are Rep. G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina, Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida and Rep. Peter Welch of Vermont. The four Republicans are Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, Rep. Mike Conaway of Texas, Rep. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania and Rep. Gregg Harper of Mississippi.

CNN’s Alan Silverleib and Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report

Rangel will ‘be glad to see what happens’ in ethics hearing

November election campaign in full swing

Washington (CNN) — If anyone doubted whether campaigning had started for the mid-term congressional elections in November, the answer became clear on Sunday.

Democratic and Republican politicians rolled out their main campaign themes on morning talk shows less than four months before voters will decide races for all 435 House seats and at least 36 of the 100 Senate posts.

West Virginia could decide to hold a special election in November to fill the seat of the late Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd, which would put 37 Senate seats in play.

To Republicans, the election is about halting the free-spending policies of a Democratic-controlled White House and Congress. For Democrats, the choice for voters is between moving forward to tackle tough issues or going back to failed GOP policies of the past.

While Democrats repeatedly invoke the crippling recession and increased deficits of the Bush administration, Republicans say the problem now is how the majority party forces through unpopular and irresponsibly expensive legislation.

“How long can the other side run against the previous administration?” asked Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, on the CNN program “State of the Union.” “They’ve been in charge now for a year and a half. They’ve been on a gargantuan spending spree.”

On the same show, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, shot back that the nation needs to progress rather than boomerang.

“What we’re going to focus on is not returning to the failed Bush policies that brought us to this point, but focus on the efforts that we have made which are making progress,” Hoyer said. “We haven’t succeeded yet, but we are making substantial progress. The economy is growing. We are creating jobs.”

Video: Hoyer talks about high anxiety of U.S.

Video: McConnell explains his ‘groove’ comment

Democrats conceded that the slow economic recovery, with unemployment still above 9 percent, continues to rankle voters upset with the entire Washington establishment. However, both Hoyer and Vice President Joe Biden took aim at GOP calls to repeal major reform bills of the past year — the health insurance overhaul and increased Wall Street regulations — and replace them with less comprehensive proposals.

“Very frankly, we think that when Americans assess, ‘Do we want to go back; do we want to, in fact, repeal the successes we’ve had and repeat the mistakes that we’ve made that got us to this point,’ I think they’re going to say, no, they don’t want to go back to the Bush policies,” Hoyer said.

Appearing on the ABC program “This Week,” Biden complained of Republican efforts to obstruct any progress under President Barack Obama.

“There is the reality of whether or not the Republicans are willing to play, whether or not the Republicans are just about repeal and repeat the old policies or they’re really wanting to do something,” Biden said.

McConnell and other Republicans made no apologies.

“What we are proud to say ‘no’ to, and I think what the public wants us to say ‘no’ to, are things like the government running banks, insurance companies, car companies, nationalizing the student loan business, taking over our health care,” he said.

His GOP ally in the House, Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana, told “Fox News Sunday” that people don’t want all the costly reform legislation pushed by Democrats.

“All we’re getting from the Democratic majority in Congress and from this White House is more bailouts, more spending, more planned stimulus, more deficits and debt, and the American people have had it,” Pence said.

On the NBC program “Meet the Press,” Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas blamed the nation’s economic woes dating to the previous administration on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, who became the nation’s first woman House Speaker in 2006.

“It is because Speaker Pelosi has been in charge for four years and denied (former President George W. Bush) the ability to continue doing what was successful in this country, and that is making the free enterprise system not only more powerful but competitive with the world,” Sessions said, later adding: “Today it’s about empowering government, and that is a mistake.”

Democrats, however, said Republicans are simply opposing whatever Obama and their party’s congressional leaders propose without offering any substantive alternatives. With primaries for November determining specific candidates, they say, the stark differences offered voters will become more apparent.

“The most vulnerable time any public official finds himself is in when they have no opponent,” Biden said, noting how Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, was thought to be in trouble until the Republican primary chose extreme conservative Sharron Angle to face him. Reid now holds a lead in the latest polling.

“I know my Republican colleagues would like to have everybody forget that their candidates are on the ballot, but their candidates will be on the ballot,” Sen. Robert Menendez, D-New Jersey, said on the NBC program. “And it’s not just talking about President Bush; it’s the policies that they espouse that are in essence Bush’s policies.

On the same show, Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said Republicans “want to get away, essentially, with carping and whining about everything here without telling the American people what they will do.”

He singled out the House Republican leader, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, as an example of what the opposition seeks to do.

Boehner “just this week said that he’s going to move to repeal the Wall Street reform bill,” Van Hollen said. “Now, Wall Street lobbyists have been working very hard to try and defeat that Wall Street reform bill. “And what he is saying is, ‘Just wait. If I have the opportunity, I’m going to take care of it for you.’ So it’s that kind of thing that’s going to make it clear to the American people what kind of choice they have.”

However, GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, also on the NBC program, said the public wants “checks and balances” in Washington.

“They’ve had single-party government, and it’s scaring the living daylights out of them,” Cornyn said, citing the health care reform bill as example. Asked what would happen with Republicans back in power, Cornyn said: “I think repeal and replace it with a common-sense solution.”

November election campaign in full swing

Is stimulus plan working? The arguments pro and con.

By

Mark Trumbull,

Ron Paul ponders politics, 2012 run

Des Moines, Iowa (CNN) — When Rep. Ron Paul walked into Hy-Vee Hall last month, a single blue sign with a simple message was placed near the escalator that took him upstairs to a fundraiser attended by 300 Republican activists.

It read: “President Ron Paul 2012.”

The sign was symbolic in many ways: Even as Iowa Republicans are focused on midterm elections, the 2012 presidential contest is not far from their minds. And it was just three years ago that Paul did not receive an invitation to participate in a presidential candidate forum held in this very building.

The sight of the Texas congressman riding the escalator up to address this group of influential Republicans was illustrative of how he has risen from a little-known congressman and afterthought presidential candidate to the national spokesman on libertarian philosophy.

All of this comes from a man who has no illusions that he can win his party’s presidential nomination, but that won’t stop him from running again in 2012 if he decides to do so.

“It is probably hard to believe, but I look at it a little bit differently than others,” Paul said in an interview during his recent visit to Iowa. “I don’t expect to be president. I don’t expect to be. That doesn’t mean I won’t run for president, but I am really energized when I think we make inroads … to broaden the outreach on the philosophy I have been talking about for 40 years.”

Video: Rep. Paul talks about GOP rifts

His advocacy of limited government, disdain for the Federal Reserve and belief that the U.S. should withdraw its troops from Afghanistan has attracted an eclectic following of young people, anti-war activists and those wary of government intrusion.

Paul began his 2008 White House run as a third-tier candidate, a gadfly with little support and even less money. Paul was never considered a serious frontrunner for the GOP nomination, but an explosion of support in the fall of 2007, fueled by online contributions, carried him into Iowa. There, he received 10 percent of the vote in the caucuses. He officially ended his presidential campaign in June 2008, well after Sen. John McCain had received enough support to win the Republican nomination.

“I don’t ever take personal credit as much as being in the right place at the right time and maybe saying the right things,” Paul said. “I have said the same things for 30 years when it came to financial bubbles. See, the business cycle theory is what motivated me to get into politics.”

On this night in Des Moines, Paul stuck to his talking points. He never mentioned a possible presidential run in 2012. Instead, Paul spoke of limited government and the need for government officials to follow the Constitution, which just so happened to be the theme of the Iowa GOP’s fundraiser. Paul’s address was bookended by standing ovations.

“I have been excited about and what he is talking about,” John Bowery, a Republican from Shenandoah, Iowa, said after Paul’s speech. “I am sorry he didn’t get more attention in 2008. I don’t know if he is going to run in 2012. If someone like him does, I will be all for it.”

Paul is an enigma in the Republican Party. He champions less government and a socially conservative philosophy, which would seem to play well with GOP base voters such as Bowery.

Yet Paul, who was the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee in 1988, doesn’t embrace the Republican brand. Party leaders and the GOP establishment types are not so smitten with him either. This is problematic in a presidential run, where well-oiled political machines are needed in key states to help build support and get-out-the-vote efforts in primaries and caucuses.

He does credit the Republican Party for sharpening its focus on the economy, but he doesn’t speak in terms of “we” but rather “they.”

“I think that the Republicans have, whether it is out of merit or accidental, they are in a good position right now mainly because they have talked about economics,” Paul said. “And their talk is good about watching the spending and watching the deficits and people are concerned about runaway government.”

I haven’t ruled it out, but I have no plans to do it.
–Ron Paul, on 2012 run

But Paul does express some skepticism that GOP promises of reforming Washington and cutting government might just be talk.

“I think they have the subject right, and they talk about it,” he said. “I think where they are going to come up short maybe not before the election, but afterwards.

“Where are they going to cut? Do they have a plan to cut? It is easy to vote against the spending when you are in opposition. But where are they going to cut? And I think that is what I have talked about … especially these past four years. And that is where we challenged the Republicans.”

Last month’s trip to Iowa was his third to the state since November 2009, so it begs the question: Is Paul trying to lay the groundwork for a 2012 White House run?

“I am very serious about thinking about it all the time,” Paul said about his possible presidential aspirations. “My answer is always the same thing: You know I haven’t ruled it out, but I have no plans to do it.”

For now, Paul will continue to travel the country to promote his philosophy, while his 2008 presidential campaign operation has morphed into the Campaign for Liberty, a 500,000-member organization that promotes libertarian views.

Paul also has a small political action committee that doles out contributions to “liberty-based candidates,” a spokesman said.

Ron Paul ponders politics, 2012 run

Republicans take sides over latest Steele controversy

Washington (CNN) — Republicans lined up on opposite sides Sunday over comments by the chairman of the Republican National Committee that the Afghanistan war launched by former President George W. Bush was “of (President Barack) Obama’s choosing” and may be unwinnable.

Speaking from Afghanistan, GOP Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina lambasted Michael Steele for the comments, which McCain called “wildly inaccurate” and Graham characterized as “uninformed, unnecessary, unwise, untimely,” while follow Republican Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina said Steele should apologize to the military.

However, conservative GOP Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, in a statement to CNN, supported Steele and said the RNC chairman’s characterization of the war was correct.

“He is guiding the party in the right direction and we (the GOP) are on the verge of victory this fall,” said Paul, who mounted an unsuccessful bid for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008. “Chairman Steele should not back off. He is giving the country, especially young people, hope as he speaks truth about this war.”

Video: Paul praises Steele’s comments

In comments at a Republican fundraiser in Connecticut Thursday, a YouTube video shows the RNC chairman declaring of the war in Afghanistan, “This was a war of Obama’s choosing.”

“This is not something the United States actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in,” he added.

Steele has stepped back from his original comments by emphasizing his support for the war.

“The stakes are too high for us to accept anything but success in Afghanistan,” Steele said in a statement intended to clarify his controversial comments.

It may be too late for him. Prominent Republican voices are calling for Steele’s resignation, including Liz Cheney, a former State Department official and the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney; Weekly Standard editor William Kristol and former South Carolina GOP chairman Katon Dawson, who finished second to Steele in the RNC chairman’s race last year.

Both McCain and Graham questioned Steele’s ability to keep his job, but said it was up to Steele and the RNC to make that decision.

“I think that Mr. Steele is going to have to assess whether he can still lead the Republican Party as chairman of the Republican National Committee,” McCain said on the ABC program “This Week.” Graham said in a separate interview on the CBS program “Face the Nation” that Steele’s comments did not represent mainstream GOP thinking.

“It’s not the Republican Party’s position, my Republican Party’s position,” Graham said.

At the same time, Graham joked that “the good news is Michael Steele is backtracking so fast he’s going to be in Kabul fighting here pretty soon.”

DeMint, in an interview on “FOX News Sunday,” called Steele’s comments unacceptable.

Steele “needs to apologize to our military, all the men and women who’ve been fighting in Afghanistan,” DeMint said, adding: “This is a war we can win and we must win.”

Paul, meanwhile, wants the United States to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan.

“I would like to congratulate Michael Steele for his leadership on one of the most important issues of today,” Paul said. “He is absolutely right: Afghanistan is now Obama’s war. During the 2008 campaign, Obama was out in front in insisting that more troops be sent to Afghanistan. Obama called for expanding the war even as he pretended to be a peace candidate.”

Steele’s critics are supporting “Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama’s war,” Paul said of the Democratic House speaker and president.

“The American people are sick and tired spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year, draining our economy and straining our military,” Paul said. “Michael Steele has it right and Republicans should stick by him.”

However, Pelosi last week voted for an amendment to a Pentagon spending bill that would have placed tough restrictions on funding for the war in Afghanistan — including a demand for a detailed troop withdrawal plan and a threat to pull money for the war if the military stays beyond next summer.

The amendment failed, but more than half the House Democratic caucus and nine Republicans voted for it, despite a White House veto threat if the final bill included the provision.

Both Graham and McCain said the United States must remain in Afghanistan as long as it takes to achieve the goal of preventing the country from again falling under Taliban control and becoming a safe haven for al Qaeda.

“The reason we came here is to secure America,” Graham said, adding it was “imperative we say to our friends and enemies alike we’re not leaving here until we’ve succeeded.”

CNN’s Mark Preston and Tom Cohen contributed to this report

Republicans take sides over latest Steele controversy

Should the US lean more on natural gas in its energy mix?

By

Mark Clayton,