Tag Archives: research

Gay candidate a front-runner in House race

Washington (CNN) — In a year when Democrats are widely considered politically handicapped, openly gay House candidate David Cicilline has bucked the trend in his race to represent Rhode Island’s 1st Congressional District.

Cicilline, the mayor of Providence, is up by double digits in the polls, holds a fundraising advantage against his competitor, Republican John Loughlin II, and has received a slew of endorsements.

And he has the help from the Democratic big guns. On Monday, President Obama stumped in the state for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, lending support for Cicilline, among others.

If elected, Cicilline, 49, would be one of four openly gay members of Congress — joining the ranks of Democratic Reps. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Jared Polis of Colorado (assuming they win their re-election bids).

Robin Brand, deputy executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, said her nonpartisan political action committee decided to endorse the mayor mainly because of his leadership track record.

Video: Democrat goes off on Obama

“He had been a successful state legislator, successful mayor and really came out of the starting gate as the front-runner in this race,” Brand said. “He is a really strong campaigner.”

But he still has work to do, according to the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

The report deems the district “Lean Democrat.” It previously changed its ranking in September from “Likely Democrat” to “Lean Democrat” after Cicilline was forced to acknowledge that the city had “improperly given him pay raises as mayor between 2006 and 2009.”

It’s a point that Loughlin was able to capitalize on.

“David Cicilline illegally collected more than $20,000 in salary that he was not entitled to — and he only gave it back because he got caught,” Loughlin said at a press conference last week. “If we can’t trust him to watch our money in city hall, how can we trust him to watch our money in Washington?”

Read more of Loughlin’s comments

Cook Political Report points out that while Loughlin has begun to rip into Cicilline’s record as mayor, “Cicilline still enters the homestretch in reasonably good shape. … Loughlin doesn’t have a ton of money left, and Cicilline is ahead anywhere from one to two dozen points in public polling.”

Brand said that Cicilline’s record on gay and lesbian issues is hardly a reason why he may appeal to a large swath of Democratic voters in the district, a seat now held by Rep. Patrick Kennedy, a liberal Democrat, who isn’t seeking re-election.

Cicilline’s “focus has been on the issues that people care about right now, which is economic development and jobs,” she said. “He has a strong reputation for building Providence’s economy and I think that focus for him has really been what has propelled him to the front of this race and put him in a really strong position to win this seat on November 2.”

The state’s largest newspaper — The Providence Journal — is also supporting him.

The paper’s endorsement reads: “Mr. Cicilline has been an honest, energetic and often innovative mayor. … He has cleansed city government of much of its reputation for corruption and hired capable people. … He has brought a level of fiscal discipline (including in relations with the city’s far too powerful public-employee unions) that has not been seen in the city for many decades.”

Read more of the endorsement

Perhaps the most likely reason that Cicilline can win, Brand added, is that voters are less likely now to care about a candidate’s sexuality because of the economic problems facing the country.

Mr. Cicilline has been an honest, energetic and often innovative mayor.
–The Providence Journal endorsement

“Ultimately, voters vote for candidates who are going to help improve their lives. It doesn’t matter if you’re gay or lesbian,” she said. “If you’ve demonstrated that you’ve helped improve people’s lives on the issues they care about, our research shows that being openly gay or lesbian is really secondary to that.”

And that’s certainly the case for Laure Rondeau, an elderly Catholic woman in Providence, who told NPR that sexuality doesn’t play a factor in her vote.

“[Sexual orientation] doesn’t bother me at all,” Rondeau said in the interview. “He’s been a good mayor of Providence, and I think he’d do well in Congress.”

In many ways, his sexuality may be a plus to some voters angry at Washington’s backroom deals and candidates deemed distant, out of touch and dishonest, Brand said.

“It’s clear that it may not be easy to run as openly gay or lesbian, but they are being open and honest about who they are,” she said. “Voters really respect that, and I think that, in some ways, can really be an advantage especially in times like this.”

Across the country, another openly gay House candidate — backed by the Victory Fund — is hoping to ride that same wave.

Steve Pougnet, 47, the Democratic mayor of Palm Springs, California, is running against Republican Rep. Mary Bono Mack in the state’s 45th Congressional District.

While the incumbent’s poll numbers are high and fundraising dollars continue to pour in, political observers note that she faces a challenge this year from Pougnet — a well-liked politician who has a husband and two children.

The Cook Political Report rates the district “Likely Republican.”

“Bono Mack remains strong here because she is one of the most moderate members of the California delegation,” according to Cook’s analysis. “Now, they finally have a credible candidate in Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet, who is receiving the kind of national support that past nominees have not enjoyed.”

The report goes on to say that Pougnet remains a “heavy underdog” because of the GOP lawmaker’s moderate voting record. (She was one of eight Republicans to vote for Democrats’ “cap and trade” energy bill.)

Gay candidate a front-runner in House race

Unions and women: Democrats’ last line of defense

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (CNN) — If Democrats hope to retain their majority in Congress, it could take some “Women of Steel” to fire up the party faithful and get them to the polls on November 2.

Mary Jane Holland is one of 1,000 female members of the United Steelworkers gathered here to talk about how to mobilize her labor colleagues to re-elect what she calls “worker-friendly candidates” across the country.

She made the trip to Pittsburgh from West Bend, Wisconsin, where she is the president of her local USW chapter. She’s been spending weekends knocking on doors, sending out voter information and urging fellow union members to vote.

“People hear negative things, and we’re trying to be positive and trying to make sure they understand how these [candidates] are working for them day in and day out,” Holland said.

She conceded many voters are upset because President Obama and congressional Democrats haven’t turned a bad economy around yet, but she said they need to be patient.

Video: Democrats’ last line of defense?

“Are we going to achieve everything in 18 months? No we’re not going to. We know it is a slow process, just like women coming up in the union.”

Tonya DeVore-Foreman is from Michigan, which has a 13.1 percent unemployment rate, the second-highest in the country. She said the sluggish economy is a reason to stick with candidates who back labor — usually Democrats, she notes — not reject them.

“We’re losing our manufacturing base every day. The manufacturing base decreases, the loss of jobs continues to grow. And we feel it is very important to get labor-friendly, working-family-friendly candidates in office.”

These are the women House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was trying to energize Monday when she visited the “Women of Steel” conference. She entered the convention ballroom to loud cheering and Tina Turner’s “Simply the Best” blaring over the speakers. Women stood up, waving signs that said, “Best Speaker Ever.”

It was a warm reception for a politician who has become a liability for many Democrats this election season. According to a recent CNN-Opinion Research Corporation poll, more than half of Americans have an unfavorable impression of Pelosi. She has kept a low profile on the campaign trail this year, traveling the country fundraising, rather than doing public appearances with Democratic candidates.

Speaking to this friendly audience in Pittsburgh, Pelosi was able to do something many Democrats have avoided this cycle — touting legislative victories on health care reform and Wall Street regulation and accusing Republicans of wanting to return to the Bush era.

“It’s a choice, as the president said, of moving America forward or going back to the failed policies. I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: We’re not going back and we’re not going back and we’re going to win because the Women of Steel, the Women of Steel are going to help us lead the way in our country to that great victory,” Pelosi said.

The problem for Democrats is that the enthusiasm in this room is not necessarily shared by other Democratic voters.

A recent CNN-Opinion Research Corporation poll shows women, who tend to support Democratic candidates over Republicans, are much less inspired to head to the polls than their male counterparts, who generally favor GOP candidates.

Thirty-eight percent of likely male voters said they were “extremely enthusiastic” about voting in the midterm elections, compared with just 23 percent of women who rated themselves the same way.

But DeVore-Foreman pushes back at polls showing voters who rallied for Obama in 2008 might be less enthusiastic now, saying union members will succeed in firing up those Americans.

“Polls talk about likely voters. One of the things we’re gonna do is we’re gonna bring people who weren’t reached in those polls, and get them to vote. Because when working people vote, our voice is heard,” DeVore-Foreman said.

She’s reaching out to fellow union members, sending postcards to workers in other states with competitive races, reminding them how important these elections will be to pushing the labor agenda through Congress.

While these women know people are disheartened by the stalled economy, they remain confident that their efforts will turn the tide for Democrats on Election Day.

“People have been sitting back, waiting and looking looking and investigating,” Holland said. “And when the election comes around, I think you’ll see it especially in the union vote. I think they’re gonna come out and vote, and it’s gonna make the difference.

Unions and women: Democrats’ last line of defense

Jobs loom over Obama’s talk of wars, peace

(CNN) — Foreign policy may be the focus of President Barack Obama’s address to the U.N. General Assembly on Thursday, but domestic concerns will continue to remain in the forefront for many White House aides.

When Obama steps to the podium in New York, he will seize a unique opportunity to update the American public — and the broader international community — on the administration’s overseas priorities, according to White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.

Among the topics likely to be covered: the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, nuclear nonproliferation efforts in Iran and North Korea, and “real opportunities” to achieve “a lasting peace in the Middle East.”

But how much do people back home care? And — perhaps more important — will yet another day focused on foreign policy hurt Democrats’ efforts to convince voters that economic recovery is really their top priority?

With the nation’s unemployment rate stuck stubbornly close to double digits, a stronger economy remains the key issue in the looming midterm elections. Fewer than one in five Americans consider the economy to be in good shape, according to a September 1-2 CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll. Eighty-one percent characterize economic conditions as poor.

Roughly half of all Americans believe the economy is as bad or worse than it was two years ago, when Obama was running for president.

Nearly 60 percent of Americans disapprove of the administration’s handling of the economy.

The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Adding to Obama’s woes: turmoil with his economic team. The White House announced Tuesday that Larry Summers, the president’s top economic adviser, will return to academia at the end of the year.

The announcement followed July’s departure of Budget Director Peter Orszag and the exit this month of former Council of Economic Advisers chief Christina Romer.

And while some analysts may give Obama credit for winding down the Iraq war or launching a new round of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks — both issues tied to the broader struggle against terrorism — there’s scant evidence voters are impressed.

Americans surveyed in the poll gave Republicans a 20-point edge — 54 to 34 percent — on the question of which party can do a better job handling terrorism. They split virtually evenly, favoring Republicans 45 to 42 percent, when asked which party can do a better job handling the war in Afghanistan.

Despite those numbers — and the critical importance of economic issues — Obama may still be hoping to find a degree of political solace in international affairs.

“Traditionally, presidents who have faced problems in their domestic agenda have turned to foreign policy to shore up their standing with the public,” CNN Polling Director Keating Holland notes.

“Previous presidents have found that acting as commander in chief, in an arena where they can act largely unchecked by Congress, has served them well. Obama may be facing a different environment in 2010, but he’s using the same playbook that most of his predecessors have since World War II.”

Nevertheless, the White House plans to quickly remind voters more worried about pocketbook issues that the president has not forgotten their concerns. Obama is set to return to the subject of the economy next week when he travels to New Mexico, Wisconsin, Iowa and Virginia.

While in Wisconsin, he’ll also raise funds for U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold, who is suddenly facing a tough re-election race.

In short: Obama’s U.N. visit may be the focus of discussion on Thursday, but the economy is far more likely to remain in the headlines in the dwindling stretch run to Election Day.

Jobs loom over Obama’s talk of wars, peace

Obama mosque issue a gift for GOP

Washington (CNN) — By wading into the issue of an Islamic center and mosque near ground zero, President Barack Obama provided Republicans with an emotion-ridden attack vehicle while diverting attention from campaign themes of fellow Democrats.

A senior Republican strategist told CNN that GOP candidates are being encouraged to talk about the issue as much as possible.

In Florida, Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott launched a statewide television ad Monday criticizing Obama for backing the right of Muslims to build an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from where the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks killed more than 2,700 people.

“Barack Obama says building a mosque at ground zero is about tolerance,” Scott says in the ad, looking directly into the camera. “He’s wrong. It’s about truth.”

The “truth,” Scott claims, is this: “Muslim fanatics murdered thousands of innocent Americans on 9/11, just yards from the proposed mosque.”

“The fight against terrorism isn’t over,” Scott concludes. “Mr. President, ground zero is the wrong place for a mosque.”

Video: Obama’s comments stir debate

Video: Lawmakers react to Obama remarks

Video: Obama mum on ‘wisdom’ of center

Video: CNN poll: Most oppose mosque

Meanwhile, a House Democratic leadership aide said the issue was dominating the political conversation when Democrats need to stress campaign themes such as economic recovery and saving social security.

“We understand why the president would want to talk about this issue, but the timing couldn’t have been any worse,” the House Democratic leadership aide told CNN.

Despite the concerns of Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada on Monday came out against building the Islamic center and mosque.

“The First Amendment protects freedom of religion. Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else,” said a statement issued by Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley.

Reid is involved in a tough re-election campaign against conservative Republican Sharron Angle. The statement on the ground zero issue also called for Republicans to back a Democratic bill that would provide health care aid and compensation for firefighters, police officers and other first responders to the 9/11 attacks.

For its part, the White House sought to tamp down the discussion Monday. Speaking to reporters, White House spokesman Bill Burton sidestepped a question on Republican strategy and tried to declare the debate over.

“The president didn’t do this because of the politics,” Burton said, adding: “I think that it’s a debate that was had and we’ve weighed in.”

On Sunday, the topic dominated morning talk shows, with Republicans calling Obama insensitive for supporting the right of Muslims to build the Islamic center so close to ground zero.

Some predicted political repercussions for Democrats in November’s congressional election, even though they agreed with Obama that freedom of religion is a vital part of American democracy.

“The Muslims have, as everyone else does, the right to practice their religion and they have the right to construct a mosque at ground zero if they wish,” Rep. Peter King, R-New York, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “What I’m saying, though, is they should listen to public opinion, they should listen to the deep wounds and anguish this is causing to so many good people.”

Republican strategist Ed Rollins, a senior political contributor to CNN, summed up the GOP perspective.

“Intellectually, the president may be right, but this is an emotional issue, and people who lost kids, brothers, sisters, fathers, what have you, do not want that mosque in New York, and it’s going to be a big, big issue for Democrats across this country,” Rollins said on the CBS program “Face the Nation.”

On the same program, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine challenged the Republican logic.

“You know, we see an awful lot of Republicans going out and saying we’ve got to respect the Constitution, and that means we have to respect it,” Kaine said. “We can’t tarnish people’s First Amendment rights.”

Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania said on the CBS program that the Islamic center issue shouldn’t have political resonance.

“I can’t imagine that any American — given the challenges facing this country — is going to vote based on what he said about the mosque,” Rendell said of the November election. “The mosque is an unfortunate situation, but we do have a right to practice our religion freely wherever we choose. Rights are not subject to the popular vote or majority vote.”

In his speech at a White House dinner Friday marking the start of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, Obama said Muslims “have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country.”

“That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” the president added.

The next day, Obama told CNN Chief White House Correspondent Ed Henry that he was “not commenting on the wisdom” of the project, just the broader principle that the government should treat “everyone equal, regardless” of religion.

His comments were considered by some to backtrack from what he said at the dinner, prompting a White House spokesman to further clarify the president’s remarks later Saturday.

Both the topic and Obama’sneed to clarify his initial remarks evoked criticism from Republicans.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told “FOX News Sunday” that Obama’s stance demonstrated how “Washington, the White House, the administration, the president himself seems to be disconnected from the mainstream of America.”

“This is sort of the dichotomy that people sense, that they’re being lectured to — not listened to — and I think that’s the reason why a lot of people are very upset with Washington,” Cornyn said.

On the CNN program, King said Obama’s lack of clarity further muddied the issue.

“If the president was going to get into this, he should have been much more clear, much more precise, and you can’t be changing your position from day to day on an issue which does go to our Constitution, and it also goes to extreme sensitivity,” King said.

Democrats responded that critics fail to distinguish between the al Qaeda terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks and the Islam religion, which includes peaceful adherents all over the world, including the United States.

“It is only insensitive if you regard Islam as the culprit as opposed to al Qaeda as the culprit,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, said on the CNN program. “We were not attacked by all Muslims. …. There were Muslims killed there. There were Muslims who ran in as first responders to help.”

The issue was one of personal rights, not political popularity, Nadler said, adding: “We do not put the Bill of Rights, we do not put the religious freedom to a vote.”

The House Democratic leadership aide lamented that the topic was getting so much attention.

“We were supposed to be talking about Social Security in this coming week,” the aide said, referring to Democratic criticism of Republican calls to privatize the government-run pension program. “This is a really good issue for us. And instead, we’re talking about the mosque.”

Obama’s remarks Friday drew praise from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who announced his support for the Islamic center last week. Bloomberg compared Obama’s speech to a letter former President George Washington wrote more than two centuries ago in support of a Jewish congregation in Newport, Rhode Island.

In the speech, Obama called the 9/11 attacks “a deeply traumatic event for our country.”

“The pain and suffering experienced by those who lost loved ones is unimaginable,” Obama continued. “So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. Ground zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.”

The Islamic center’s leaders say they plan to build the $100 million, 13-story facility called Cordoba House two blocks from the site of the 9/11 attacks. The developer, Sharif el-Gamal, describes the project as an “Islamic community center” that would include a 500-seat performing arts center, a lecture hall, a swimming pool, a gym, a culinary school, a restaurant and a prayer space for Muslims.

Nearly 70 percent of Americans oppose the plan, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll released Wednesday.

CNN’s Mark Preston contributed to this story

Obama mosque issue a gift for GOP

Obama on Gulf: ‘Job is not finished’

Panama City, Florida (CNN) — On a visit to the Gulf Coast on Saturday, President Barack Obama said that while the gushing undersea BP oil well had been capped, the administration remains committed to ensuring a full cleanup and recovery for those crippled by the disaster.

“I’m here to tell you our job is not finished and and we are not going anywhere until it is,” Obama said after meeting with government and business leaders in Panama City, Florida.

“That’s a message I wanted to come here and deliver directly to the people along the Gulf Coast,” he said. “Because it’s the men and women of this region who have felt the burden of this disaster, who have watched with anger and dismay as their livelihoods and way of life were threatened these past few months.”

Obama arrived in Florida on Saturday, his fifth visit to the Gulf Coast since the start of the oil disaster, with his wife, Michelle, and daughter Sasha. He will spend the weekend on the coast in a trip intended to relay long-term support for economically devastated areas.

By his holiday on the beach, he hoped to change public perceptions and mitigate the effects of the disaster. He reminded America that the Gulf Coast was open for business.

“As a result of the cleanup effort, beaches all along the Gulf Coast are clean, safe, and open for business. That’s one of the reasons Michelle, Sasha, and I are here,” he said.

Many had wondered whether Obama would take a presidential plunge into the warm waters of the Gulf to send his message home.

Obama said he would take a dip but he wasn’t going to be shirtless in front of cameras. Obama caused a bit of a tabloid stir when he took off his shirt to reveal a muscular physique during trips to Hawaii.

The president and first lady participated in a roundtable discussion with Obama’s Gulf Coast recovery chief, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and local mayors and business leaders in the Panama City area.

He said he spoke with Lee Ann Leonard, general manager of By the Sea Resorts, who has seen a big decline in tourism. She told Obama that June wasn’t bad but July was tough and that she was hoping to rebound in August and September.

Visitors spent more than $34 billion in 2008 in congressional districts along the Gulf Coast, sustaining 400,000 jobs. The effects of the oil spill on the region’s travel industry could last up to three years and cost up to $22.7 billion, according to an analysis conducted last month by Oxford Economics for the U.S. Travel Association.

In preparing the research, Oxford Economics looked at current spending, government models predicting oil flow and the effect of 25 past crises on tourism to develop a model to gauge the Gulf disaster’s impact.

Case studies of past disasters — including the SARS respiratory disease outbreak, Hurricane Katrina and the 2004 Asian tsunami — show that tourism often is affected beyond the disaster area and long after the resolution of the crisis.

Meanwhile, National Incident Commander Thad Allen said Saturday he is ordering BP to conduct additional pressure tests before giving a go ahead for finishing a relief well that would permanently seal the ruptured undersea well.

It will take a few days before the results of those tests are assessed, Allen said in a teleconference with reporters. It will take up to 96 hours after that before the well can be intercepted, he said.

Video: Obama: ‘our job is not finished’

Video: Gulf area waits for Obama

“We will kill the well. The relief well be executed. The bottom kill will be executed,” he said.

Allen said crews probably did “too good a job on the top kill.” Cement and mud got into a core area of the well. But Allen said it’s not clear how thick the cement layer is, or how vulnerable it might be to pressure inside the well.

The BP oil well, which ruptured April 20 after an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, spilled more than 2 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico before being successfully shut.

Since then, fresh, green grass has started growing again in some of the hardest-hit marshes of southern Louisiana, but oil continues to wash ashore in some places.

Obama said Saturday the government will continue to monitor the oil in the ocean as well as any that hits the shore.

“I won’t be satisfied until the environment has been restored, no matter how long it takes,” he said.

CNN’s Ed Henry contributed to this report.

Obama on Gulf: ‘Job is not finished’

Critics cite 100 worst stimulus projects

Washington (CNN) — Monkeys on cocaine. New windows for a closed visitor center. Modern dance as a tool for software development.

A report to be released Tuesday by conservative Republican Sens. Tom Coburn and John McCain cited these and 97 other projects as leading examples of misguided or wasteful spending under the Obama administration’s $862 billion economic stimulus bill.

Titled “Summertime Blues,” the report is the third by the two senators targeting projects that they say fail to meet the job-creation goal of spending under the Recovery Act of 2009.

“We owe it to all Americans that are paying taxes and struggling to find jobs, to rebuild our economy without doing additional harm, and to do it in a way that expands opportunities for future generations,” said the introduction to the report by Coburn, R-Oklahoma, and McCain, R-Arizona. “Too many stimulus projects are failing to meet that goal.”

While some projects in the report “may have merit,” they are “being mismanaged or were poorly planned,” the report said.

The Recovery Act, which was passed a few weeks after President Barack Obama took office, was a government-funded effort to kick-start economic activity in response to the ongoing recession.

It called for “shovel-ready” jobs — from road and bridge repair and construction to scientific research and expanded broadband and wireless service — through federal contracts, grants and loans, as well as helping state and local governments avoid layoffs and funding tax cuts.

The senators’ report challenged the viability or effectiveness of specific projects across the country. However, the report’s use of selected information from hundreds of footnoted sources left it unclear whether the brief summaries of each project told the whole story.

In a previous report in January, the senators included the Napa Valley Wine Train as an example of wasteful stimulus spending, without mentioning that the money was for a flood control project along the train’s route, rather than the train itself.

The latest edition covered a broad range of projects including construction, research, development and conservation.

Topping the list was $554,763 for new windows at the Coldwater Ridge Visitor Center at Mount St. Helens in Washington state. The U.S. Forest Service facility opened in 1993 at a cost of $11.5 million to provide visitors with panoramic views of the scenic volcano.

However, it closed in 2007 due to staffing shortages, and now is getting the stimulus funds to replace its trademark windows in preparation for use for another purpose, according to information provided by the Forest Service.

“One government official likened it to ‘keeping a vacant house in good repair,’ while another official noted that there is hope to find some purpose for the building in the future, whether as a hotel, science camp or restaurant,” the report said, attributing the information to a July 2009 article on tdn.com, a local news website. “Despite those efforts, there are no plans to use the empty space.”

The Forest Service information provided no timetable for the possible reopening of the visitors’ center for another purpose.

“The Forest Service is now reviewing several proposals for how the facility could be used in the future through a variety of public-private partnerships, including a science facility, education camp, or an overnight lodge,” the Forest Service document said.

Ranked second on the senators’ list was a University of North Carolina at Charlotte project that received $762,372 in stimulus finds to develop a computerized choreography program, the report said.

Quoting a July 6 story posted on the Charlotte-based news website WCNC.com, the report said the project involves recording dancers on video, then logging and analyzing their movements.

“This will allow choreographers to explore the interactive dance without always having a full cast of dancers present,” said the grant posted on the government’s stimulus bill website, recovery.gov.

“The system will be extended into a Web-based ‘Dance Tube’ application that will allow the public to engage in interactive dance choreography,” the grant goes on to say.

However, the senators’ report initially failed to state the money was spread over three years. Again citing the WCNC.com story, it also initially said lead researcher Celine Latulipe “noted that her funding was severely restricted by the fact that the university is taking a 44 percent cut to cover ‘overhead’ expenses.”

In reality the website story said: “The money is spread over three years and Latulipe points out the university takes 44 percent overhead.”

After the discrepancy was pointed out by CNN, the report was changed, an aide to Coburn said.

In an interview with CNN, Latulipe said the project fit the kind of research and development work called for by the Recovery Act.

Through its application and further development, it could lead to audiences having an impact on performance by registering their reaction through handheld audience response devices, Latulipe said.

“We’ll need to develop a bunch of different software packages that never existed before,” she said, adding that the project employs three students part-time over its three-year span and pays for dancers and other participants in what amounts to direct economic activity.

“I think it’s sad that this research money that is really allowing innovation and funding students doing great research is being used as a political tool,” Latulipe said.

Then there is the project listed at No. 28 by the senators — $71,623 to researchers at Wake Forest University to see how monkeys react to cocaine.

Titled “Effect of Cocaine Self-Administration on Metabotropic Glutamate Systems,” the project calls for monkeys to self-administer drugs while researchers monitor and study their glutamate levels, the report said.

It cited a March 8 Raleigh News and Observer article that quoted Wake Forest University School of Medicine spokesman Mark Wright as saying the stimulus money would allow the university to continue a job that otherwise might have been cut.

Paula Faria, assistant vice president for media relations at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, said the grant will “have significant impact on public health in regards to cocaine addiction and the issue of relapse.”

“It’s also important to note that the applications for these grants are peer reviewed and this study was deemed of merit by a panel of scientific experts, and then reviewed by the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse before funds were awarded,” Faria said in a statement to CNN.

Liz Oxhorn, the White House spokesperson for the Recovery Act, called the senators’ report a partisan effort intended to undermine the overall success of the Recovery Act.

According to Oxhorn, new research shows stimulus money is responsible for nearly 3 million jobs and has lowered unemployment by 1.5 percent.

“We’ll look into each of their claims and take action if any have merit, but with more than 70,000 Recovery Act projects underway, any misguided project is just a small fraction of tens of thousands coast to coast that are rebuilding America and putting people to work,” Oxhorn said.

Critics cite 100 worst stimulus projects

Can Obama sell Democrats’ legislative victories?

Washington (CNN) — A legislative win is a win — but not necessarily when it comes to swaying voters facing the worst economic conditions since the Great Depression.

High unemployment and fears over an ever-increasing federal debt are weighing heavily on Americans. That could drown out President Obama’s message as he heads out on the campaign trail to tout Democrats’ legislative wins: health care reform, financial regulatory reform and economic stimulus projects, among others.

“Right now he is facing an uphill battle,” said Vanderbilt University political scientist John Geer. “I don’t think there’s much that can be done about that. He’ll sharpen the message. But when economies are soft, incumbents have a tough time.”

And members of Congress, bracing for a tough election, got a frank assessment Wednesday of where the economy is headed.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned that the economic outlook remains “unusually uncertain.” But he said that while there are growing signs of weakness in the nation’s economic recovery, Bernanke and other top Federal Reserve officials still expect “continued moderate growth, a gradual decline in the unemployment rate, and subdued inflation over the next several years.”

Read more on Bernanke’s assessment

In addition to championing Democrats’ legislative wins, Obama is being urged to continue to go after Republicans — and lay out an argument that conditions in the country won’t improve if the opposition takes control of Congress after the midterm election.

So far, that strategy is being employed.

Video: Financial reform signed into law

Video: Obama urges Senate to act on jobs

Obama recently traveled to Missouri to help fellow Democrat Sen. Robin Carnahan in her crucial Senate race.

“The last thing we should do is go back to the very ideas that got us into this mess,” Obama said at the campaign event. “That’s the choice you are going to face in November. … a choice between falling backward or moving forward.”

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll would seem to support that strategy, according to CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

The poll, released in late June, found that Americans are angry at both the Republican and Democratic parties for the economy, but they continue to blame the GOP slightly more than the Democrats for the country’s current economic woes.

Fifty-three percent said they are angry at both parties; only 7 percent are angry only at the Democrats and 9 percent are angry only at Republicans.

But that’s not necessarily good news for the Democrats, since an anti-incumbent mood tends to hurt the party with more incumbents. Some argue, however, that it suggests 2010 may not be a precise replay of 1994 when Republicans grabbed control of both legislative chambers from Democrats.

“Democrats are saying ‘Look, let’s make this a referendum on Barack Obama as the future and the Republicans wanting to go back to the past — and Republicans wanting more of the same policies that got us into the economic mess in the first place,’ ” CNN Senior Political Analyst Gloria Borger said.

That strategy worked for Democrats in 2006 and 2008, she said, when they told voters change was needed.

“It’s a very good decision on [Democrats'] part obviously, because that’s the way they get some of those voters back — particularly, independent white men who are deserting them,” Borger added.

Another problem for Obama’s legislative campaign tour? That those policies will be portrayed as big-government.

“It’s difficult in the economic environment because people are nervous,” she said. “Polls show that people are more worried about the deficit than getting tax cuts. They’re worried about government spending and worried about too much government. … So he wins Wall Street reform but doesn’t get credit for it because we’re in a different political environment.”

But that is the environment right now. What if the economy were to improve?

“If the economy right now was showing tremendous growth and jobs were being created, he’d have no problem making the argument [for Democrats to be re-elected]. But we’re not there right now,” Geer said.

Economic conditions are not just a product of policy — but also the natural economic cycle, he added.

“Ronald Reagan’s economy took off in part due to some policies he pursued but also because of natural business cycles just like for Clinton. So there’s a lot of it outside the control. Right now, I suspect Obama’s getting a little too much of the blame … we’ll see if he is successful.”

CNN Polling Director Keating Holland, along with CNNMoney.com’s Scott Spoerry and Chris Isidore, contributed to this report.

Can Obama sell Democrats’ legislative victories?