Tag Archives: president-obama

Campaign Circus: Ben Stein calls Miller a ‘clown’

(CNN) — As Election Day gets closer, the rhetoric gets more intense, interesting and, shall we say, passionate. Here are some things you might have missed.

Miller? Miller? Miller?

Ben Stein — famous for his role in the ’80s movie classic “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” and his political/economic commentary — took to the pages of the Alaska Dispatch to blast Tea Party-backed Republican Senate candidate Joe Miller, calling him a “dangerous, stupid clown.”

Tell us how you really feel

Frank Caprio, the Democrat running to become Rhode Island’s next governor, did not hold back his anger when it was reported that President Obama would not endorse him. He said in a radio interview, “He can take his endorsement and really shove it as far as I’m concerned.”

Obama needs “correction”

Gov. Joe Manchin, the Democrat running for West Virginia’s Senate seat, issued a stern warning for the president when asked whether he should be re-elected, saying “Things have got to change.”

The magic of Photoshop

A new television ad is under fire for a photo of Rep. Mark Schauer, D-Michigan, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The problem? Schauer’s campaign says his rival, Republican Tim Walberg, Photoshopped two people out of the photo making it appear as though the Democrat and Pelosi were arm-in-arm.

Photo of the day: Harry Reid’s dance moves

If Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid fails to win re-election, he may have a backup plan: as a contestant on ABC’s “Dancing With The Stars.”

“Big Pimpin” for Obama in 2012

The New York Post reports that Obama’s strategists are eyeing rapper Jay-Z to campaign for the president as 2012 approaches. The targeted demographic: the youth and minority vote.

The Boss opens his wallet

Bruce Springsteen has decided to jump into the 2010 race by donating $2,400 to a fellow rocker taking the political plunge: John Hall, a former member of the band Orleans.

You know you’ve made it when …

“Saturday Night Live” parodies you. The latest person to feel the love is New York gubernatorial candidate Jimmy McMillan, running for the “Rent Is Too Damn High” party. Actor Keenan Thompson gets two gloves up from critics.

Campaign Circus: Ben Stein calls Miller a ‘clown’

Obama notes private sector job growth, rips GOP

(CNN) — President Obama put a positive spin on the Labor Department’s new jobs report Friday, noting the country has now had nine straight months of private sector job growth.

The economy lost 95,000 jobs in September, though the private sector added 64,000 jobs. The nation’s unemployment rate remained unchanged at 9.6 percent.

Obama blamed the net job loss on layoffs at both the U.S. Census and state and local governments. He slammed the GOP for opposing additional state assistance.

“We have to keep doing everything we can to accelerate this economy,” he said during a visit to a Maryland brick and masonry company. Too many Americans have been “swept up in the most devastating recession of our lifetimes.”

Obama highlighted the recently enacted small-business aid bill — a measure opposed by many senior Republicans — and renewed his push for a permanent extension of the Bush tax cuts for families making less than $250,000.

“The damage left by this recession is so deep that it’s going to take a long time to get out,” he said.

Republicans have repeatedly warned that a failure to extend all of the tax cuts — including those for wealthier Americans — will damage an already sluggish recovery. GOP leaders have also criticized the White House’s economic recovery initiatives, claiming they’ve needlessly added to the debt while failing to sufficiently stimulate growth.

“With each passing month, and each new jobs report, it becomes increasingly clear that while massive Washington spending is growing the size of government, it’s clearly not growing sustainable private-sector jobs,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said in statement released before Obama’s remarks.

“The trillion-dollar stimulus didn’t live up to promises made by the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress; the massive growth of the federal government didn’t result in a similar growth of jobs; and the maze of new regulations, health care mandates and taxes are having a predictable impact on the economy.”

Obama notes private sector job growth, rips GOP

White House denies Obama-Clinton ticket in the works

Washington (CNN) — White House spokesman Robert Gibbs is pouring cold water on the red-hot speculation — fueled by journalist Bob Woodward in a CNN interview — that President Barack Obama may create a so-called “dream ticket” of Obama-Clinton in his 2012 re-election battle.

“No one in the White House is discussing this as a possibility,” Gibbs told CNN Wednesday morning.

The speculation that Obama may dump Vice President Joe Biden as his running mate and shift him over to the secretary of state job — moving current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the VP slot — was sparked by Woodward in an interview Tuesday night with CNN’s Chief National Correspondent John King.

“It’s on the table,” Woodward said on “John King, USA.” “Some of Hillary Clinton’s advisers see it as a real possibility in 2012.”

Obama advisers outside the White House note privately that it’s significant that Woodward attributed the theory to Clinton advisers and not White House aides or Obama advisers, signaling this may only have traction among Clinton supporters hoping she would move one step closer to the Oval Office and be set up as the likely Democratic nominee for president in 2016.

Video: Woodward: ‘Hard to be president’

Woodward is the author of “Obama’s Wars,” a book that takes a close look at deliberations between Obama, Biden, Clinton and all of the other top players inside the White House over sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. The journalist suggested Tuesday that Obama will need his secretary of state to bring the party together in two years.

“President Obama needs some of the women, Latinos, retirees that she did so well with during the [2008] primaries and, so they switch jobs, not out of the question, and the other interesting question is, Hillary Clinton could run in her own right in 2016 and be younger than Ronald Reagan when he was elected president,” he said.

Clinton will be 69 years old and three months in January 2017. President Ronald Reagan was just shy of his 70th birthday in January, 1980.

“Now you talk to Hillary Clinton or her advisers and they say ‘no, no there’s not a political consideration here,’” Woodward continued. “Of course the answer is — you point out to them that her clout around the world when she goes to Europe, Asia, anywhere, is in part, not just because she’s secretary of state or because she was married to President Clinton, (but) that people see a potential future president in her.”

Back in 2008, Biden also suggested that as former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his dream job was secretary of state. But Democratic officials privately say that after getting a taste of the number-two job as vice president, they find it hard to believe Biden still wants to be secretary of state, which would now be seen as a step down.

White House denies Obama-Clinton ticket in the works

Obama, top Dems to huddle on way out

(CNN) — Top congressional Democrats will huddle with President Obama Thursday for one last strategy session before lawmakers leave Washington to campaign for their jobs.

As November election season nears, Democrats are dealing with voter anger about lingering high unemployment, two wars and a growing federal deficit.

Earlier this week, Obama had already appeared to be in campaign mode as he addressed a group at a town hall-style meeting in the yard of a home in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

At the meeting Tuesday, Obama faced a range of questions but no matter the topic — education, small businesses, military veterans, clean energy — he repeatedly reminded listeners that the upcoming congressional elections would be their time to decide.

“I hope everybody is going to pay attention and do their homework and find out about candidates,” Obama said at the end of the hour-long event. “And I think what you’ll find is, is that when you’re making choices for governor and you’re making choices for Senate and Congress, that these choices are going to mean something.”

He encouraged people to ask themselves, “What direction do I want this country to go in?”

“Do I want to invest in our people, in our middle class and making it stronger, and our infrastructure and our education system and clean energy — is that one vision,” Obama said, “or are we just going to keep on doing the same things that got us into this mess in the first place?”

His stark portrayal of the stakes in November and his Thursday White House meeting with party leaders comes as polls show likely losses for Democrats, with a possibility they could lose their majority in the House.

Obama, top Dems to huddle on way out

Stem cell research can continue during appeal

(CNN) — An appeals court has permanently lifted an injunction imposed by a federal judge, thereby allowing federally funded embryonic stem-cell research to continue while the Obama administration appeals the judge’s original ruling against use of public funds in such research.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed Tuesday to permanently lift the injunction and allow the National Institutes of Health to continue research. The court had temporarily lifted that injunction September 9 pending further consideration.

“President Obama made expansion of stem cell research and the pursuit of groundbreaking treatments and cures a top priority when he took office,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement. “We’re heartened that the court will allow NIH and their grantees to continue moving forward while the appeal is resolved.”

District Court Judge Royce Lamberth earlier this month said he would not agree to delay his injunction while the case was appealed.

“Defendants [the government] are incorrect about much of their ‘parade of horribles’ that will supposedly result from this Court’s preliminary injunction,” Lamberth wrote in his court order in early September.

The “horribles” he referred to are an extensive list of research projects outlined by the National Institutes of Health that would have to be shelved if a stay were not granted.

“Congress has mandated that the public interest is served by preventing taxpayer funding of research that entails the destruction of human embryos,” Lamberth said.

“In this court’s view a stay would flout the will of Congress as this court understands what Congress has enacted. … Congress remains perfectly free to amend or revise the statute. This Court is not free to do so,” Lamberth said.

Lamberth’s ruling, which stunned the administration, stopped any further medical research that involves the use of taxpayer dollars to fund projects requiring the destruction of embryos. The appeals court ruling Tuesday allows research to continue during the U.S. Justice Department appeal.

The litigation resulted from a lawsuit against the National Health Institute filed by researchers opposed to use of embryonic stem cells, a group that seeks adoptive parents for human embryos created through in vitro fertilization, the nonprofit Christian Medical Association and others.

When the injunction was first issued by Lamberth in August, Ron Stoddart, executive director of Nightlight Christian Adoptions — one of the groups that filed the lawsuit — said he supported adult stem-cell research that doesn’t require destroying embryos.

“Frequently people will say why are you opposed to stem-cell research and of course our answer is, ‘We’re not,’ ” Stoddart said. “We’re opposed to the destruction of the embryos to get embryo stem cells.”

CNN’s Bill Mears and Phil Gast contributed to this report.

Stem cell research can continue during appeal

Obama in Ohio to push economic plan

Washington (CNN) — As President Obama heads to Cleveland, Ohio on Wednesday to roll out a set of comprehensive proposals aimed at fixing the ailing U.S. economy, top aides are knocking down suggestions that politics and the midterms are driving this effort.

“We are not calibrating these decisions based on a political calendar,” said a senior administration who briefed reporters ahead of the president’s speech. “We are trying to make decisions that are going to build a stronger economy for this country over the long run.”

In Ohio — a state especially hard hit by a slumping economy — Obama will propose $200 billion in tax cuts for businesses to purchase new equipment, and write off 100 percent of their new investments through the end of 2011, according to another senior administration official. The White House said 1.5 million companies stand to take advantage of the incentives.

“The economic team thinks this is a very high bang-for-the-buck way to get businesses off the sidelines, get them investing, get them creating jobs,” said the official.

In his Cleveland speech, Obama also will highlight his $50 billion proposal for infrastructure investment announced Monday, the officials said, and also $100 billion to permanently extend tax credits to businesses for research and development.

The officials framed the proposals as long-term fixes, with some short-term benefits.

The officials emphasized that the president’s remarks will extend beyond just tax cuts and billions of dollars in new spending.

“He’ll also be talking about where the economy has been, where we are now and where we’re headed,” said one top aide.

Video: Caught off guard

Even as critics argue that the president dragged his feet in rolling out these proposals, the officials were quick to defend the administration’s efforts. One said that Obama had been focused on the economy from the very beginning of his term, and that this latest push fits into the overall economic recovery plan.

The president’s message may bring hope to some Americans desperate for help, but Congress holds the keys, and it seems unlikely than anything will get done before the critical midterm elections.

One thing the nation won’t hear the president say Wednesday is that his proposals equal a second stimulus.

“We’re not thinking of it as a single legislative package,” said one of the officials who briefed reporters. “We’re thinking of it as a set of proposals to add to the other proposals the president is continuing to do.”

Obama in Ohio to push economic plan

Shirley Sherrod to meet with Vilsack about a job

(CNN) — Shirley Sherrod, who received an apology after being forced to resign from the Agriculture Department, will meet Tuesday with Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to discuss a job offer, a department official confirmed Saturday.

It will be the first face-to-face meeting between the two since a controversial sequence of events last month culminated in her stepping down.

Sherrod, who was the Agriculture Department’s Georgia Director of Rural Development, has said she is being offered the position of deputy director of the Office of Advocacy and Outreach.

The position includes administration and outreach to improve the Agriculture Department’s civil rights efforts and image nationwide.

The department official who confirmed the meeting asked not to be identified.

Sherrod was forced to resign in July after misleading and incomplete video footage of a speech she gave was posted on the internet and picked up in media reports. Vilsack apologized to her and offered her the promotion.

The flap began after conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart posted a portion of a speech Sherrod gave in which she spoke of not offering her full help to a white farmer. The original post by Breitbart indicated that the incident Sherrod mentioned occurred when she worked for the Agriculture Department, and news outlets quickly picked up on the story.

However, the incident took place decades before she joined the department, and her speech in its unedited form made the point that people should move beyond race. In addition, the white farmer who Sherrod mentioned has told reporters that she helped him save his farm.

Sherrod spoke about the incident Saturday at a meeting of the Federation of Southern Cooperatives Land Assistance Fund in Epes, Alabama.

She said her work with other agencies to help poor counties in south Georgia was overlooked during the controversy.

Sherrod said Saturday she has no criticism of President Obama and believes the NAACP, which also urged her to resign before learning the video had misconstrued her comments, was tricked.

NAACP President Ben Jealous spoke Saturday at the Alabama meeting.

Repeated calls to Sherrod were not returned Saturday.

Shirley Sherrod to meet with Vilsack about a job

Criticism to follow Obama on vacation

(CNN) — President Obama and his family head to Martha’s Vineyard on Friday for a weeklong vacation, but don’t expect it to be without controversy.

It will be the president’s second time on the island off the coast of Massachusetts. In 2009, Obama spent time golfing and hanging out with family and friends.

Vacations are often considered political low-hanging fruit: Zing a president or first lady anytime they go away for some rest and relaxation.

Critics have asked: Why did the Obamas go to Maine instead of the Gulf Coast as Obama had encouraged Americans to help bolster tourism there? Once in the Gulf, why only for 27 hours? Who footed the bill for Michelle Obama’s glitzy trip to Spain?

As for Martha’s Vineyard, isn’t that an elite playground?

Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said some voters pay close attention to the message a destination sends — especially in tough economic times.

“People would rather see their President in Put-in-Bay, Ohio, or the Wisconsin Dells than in the Kennedy realm of Cape Cod,” he said.

Journalist Ken Walsh, who wrote a book on the history of presidential retreats, said the level of criticism goes up no matter who is in office.

“The opposition party is almost like a parlor game in Washington,” he said. “There’s a ritual that the out party criticizes the president for being profligate with spending taxpayers’ money for flying away from Washington, for not being sensitive to people’s concerns and that’s what is happening with President Obama now.”

Walsh recalled how President Clinton was concerned about how his vacation destination played in middle America.

“President Clinton, for instance, took polls to figure out where he should go on vacation when he ran for re-election,” he said. “He took polls to figure out where Americans want the president to go. Well [it was] national parks, so President Clinton went to national parks.”

But Clinton also spent plenty of time on Martha’s Vineyard.

The view of Martha’s Vineyard, a vacation spot of the rich and famous, has the potential to hurt a president’s image with average Americans when times are tough.

“When they run into trouble, public relations-wise, [is] if they look like they are being insensitive to the problems of the country and whatever people are going through,” he said. “And that could be the problem President Obama has in Martha’s Vineyard.”

Presidential vacations have been scrutinized by the public for more than a century.

George W. Bush was often criticized by Democrats for taking long vacations to his ranch in Crawford, Texas, during the Iraq war.

For Theodore Roosevelt, leaving Washington for months to ride the rails or a horse created an uproar. The same was true for Franklin Roosevelt, who spent time floating around on his private yacht.

“Criticism’s always been there … whether it’s Theodore Roosevelt disappearing and hunting, there’s criticism,” Brinkley said. “Whether it’s FDR living on a yacht and not being at the White House, there’s criticism.”

Even John Adams came under fire when he spent around eight months away from the White House caring for his sick wife, Abigail.

“When he was away, the critics said he kind of abdicated the presidency,” Walsh said. “And there were a lot of attempts to organize a sort of a war against France when he was away. So, he had to come back to deal with all that.”

CNN’s Ed Hornick contributed to this report.

Criticism to follow Obama on vacation

Obama: No regrets over Islamic center comments

Columbus, Ohio (CNN) — President Obama said Wednesday that he has “no regrets” about his comments last week supporting the rights of Muslims to build an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from the site of the September 11 terror attacks in New York.

“The answer is no regrets,” Obama said when asked about bringing up the issue Friday at a White House dinner commemorating the start of Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

At the dinner, Obama said that those wanting to build the Islamic center and mosque have the constitutional right to religious freedom. On Saturday, he clarified that he was talking only about the right to build the center and not the “wisdom” of doing so close to “ground zero,” where more than 2,700 people died when planes hijacked by terrorists slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center.

The remarks sparked a national debate on the emotional issue, with many Republicans condemning the president as insensitive to families of victims and out of touch with the views of most Americans.

Many Democrats responded that the right to religious freedom applies to all Americans, though some — including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — said they oppose having the Islamic center so close to ground zero.

A CNN poll showed that 70 percent of respondents opposed having an Islamic center near the site. A separate poll released Wednesday by the Siena Research Institute found that 63 percent opposed it, but 64 percent said the center’s developers have a constitutional right to build it.

Obama: No regrets over Islamic center comments

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?

Washington (CNN) — While he’s not on the ballot, George W. Bush is still vital to the midterm election as far as the nation’s top Democrat is concerned.

President Obama has made a point recently to invoke Bush’s name in what many say is a calculated effort to remind voters of the previous administration’s economic policies, which Democrats argue led to the worst recession in modern history.

On Monday, the president told those attending a Democratic fundraiser in Atlanta, Georgia, that the GOP has not distinguished itself from Bush.

“They have not come up with a single solitary, new idea to address the challenges of the American people,” Obama said. “They don’t have a single idea that’s different from George Bush’s ideas … not one.”

That sentiment was echoed once again on Wednesday during a speech before the AFL-CIO and at a fundraiser in Chicago, Illinois, a day later.

“They haven’t come out with a single solitary idea that is different from policies that held sway for eight years before Democrats took over,” Obama said Thursday. “Not a single policy difference that’s discernable from [George W.] Bush. Not one.”

Since taking office, Obama has largely referred to the “previous administration” or the “Republican control for the past eight years” in place of saying the name “Bush.”

So why the recent surge in Bush-bashing? It may have something to do with polls.

Video: Most negative campaign season ever?

Video: Obama: Job growth must increase

A Quinnipiac University poll, taken July 13-19, asked 2,181 registered voters: “Who do you blame more for the current condition of the U.S. economy: former President George W. Bush or President Barack Obama?”

Fifty-three percent said Bush; 25 percent said Obama; 21 percent said either neither, both or unsure.

Perhaps the most stark example of why Bush’s name is now a part of Obama’s stump speech comes from a poll by the Benenson Strategy Group, the president’s chief polling firm. The poll was taken for Third Way, a moderate think tank.

Conducted June 19-22 of 1,100 likely voters, the poll found that Bush’s economic principles are “almost universally rejected” by a large margin — and merely bringing up Bush’s name causes a swing in attitudes.

When respondents were asked whether they would prefer a candidate who “will stick with President Barack Obama’s economic policies” or “one who will return to President George W. Bush’s economic policies,” the result was a 15-point advantage for the Obama approach.

Read more of the poll results

“President Bush is the key here,” said Sean Gibbons of Third Way. “If you enter President Bush’s name into the equation and ask people when they’re making a choice at the polls between going forward with President Obama’s economic agenda or voting for a candidate who will pursue similar economic ideas as President Bush, Obama runs the table by 49 points. That is extraordinary.”

Conservatives fare better when one of the poll questions pitted generic conservative ideas on the economy to those of the Obama administration. It showed that a majority “actually favor conservative ideas,” Gibbons said, adding that “if you don’t use President Bush’s name, the whole thing flips.”

Republicans, meanwhile, discredit the notion that invoking Bush will change the outcome of the election.

“Democrats can keep talking about the [Bush administration], but they’ll do so in vain,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Doug Heye. “Voters are concerned with the here and now, which means a job market that has atrophied and foreclosures on the rise while the Democrats who control Washington pass a stimulus bill no one wanted.”

Oregon Republican Greg Walden, the deputy chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, has said that Democrats can “spin, they can sing, they can dance naked in the streets to say it’s about Bush, but he’s neither in the White House nor on the ballot.”

Texas GOP Rep. Pete Sessions, who chairs the campaign committee, told reporters in July that Republican candidates already “have their footing” in their races and noted that the former president has not participated in any political activities since he left office.

“He has not been involved. He does not do fundraisers. He’s said to us ‘I’m not interested in doing it’ and that’s goes back to the day he left,” Sessions added.

CNN’s Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?