Tag Archives: health

Henry in the House: Who Is Pete Rouse?

Chicago, Illinois (CNN) — President Obama is going from a chief of staff dubbed “Rahmbo” who once sent a dead fish to a political opponent to the exact opposite: a shy, self-effacing guy known for being a gentle boss and a cat lover.

The style differences between outgoing chief Rahm Emanuel and incoming chief Pete Rouse could not be more stark. Emanuel is hard-charging and profane, often dispensing shrewd political advice with a string of F-bombs to accentuate the point.

Rouse is the low-key, behind-the-scenes player who carefully maps out each move in an understated and yet equally effective way. After all, he was the guy who while serving as then-Sen. Barack Obama’s chief of staff meticulously laid out an improbable but meticulous battle plan about how a largely unknown freshman senator could put together a winning presidential campaign.

In public, Rouse never took any victory laps after playing such a pivotal role in helping to get Obama elected as the nation’s first African-American president. He simply went back to work, this time as a senior adviser in the White House, with little fanfare — a perfect fit with the “No Drama Obama” style we came to know during the campaign.

Drama, of course, is Emanuel’s middle name. He’s loud and rarely shy about being quoted in the media — either named or unnamed — in stories highlighting his vast influence over the Obama agenda.

While there were some people inside the White House who privately chafed at that approach, the fact is there’s no denying that Emanuel’s efforts have brought Obama major successes in the first two years of the administration.

I remember being in Chicago, Illinois, almost exactly two years ago, right after the 2008 presidential election, and I remember Obama immediately pouncing on the opportunity to try and woo Emanuel into leaving his seat in the House of Representatives to become his chief of staff.

Emanuel confided in me and others at the time that he was severely conflicted because he really wanted to stay in the House and become the first Jewish speaker of the House someday. But Obama was tugging him in the other direction with another piece of history, the opportunity to steer the country back on course with once-in-a-generation policy changes like the $787 billion stimulus and landmark health care reform.

Admittedly the jury is still out on the Obama-Emanuel “Big Bang” approach to governing, that the severity of the financial crisis demanded swift, bold and unprecedented action. There are Republicans who believes they far overstepped their mandate, while there are Democrats who agree with the policies but are privately waiting to see the Nov. 2 midterm election results before they’re willing to say whether the approach made sense politically.

Emanuel jumped at the chance to be running the White House at such a pivotal time, and he never looked back much on the decision to bolt the House. And his approach has been at least partly vindicated with a series of legislative victories that most presidents would love to have for the history books.

“I think his leadership, his energy has helped us accomplish so much in helping our economy recover,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said. “In passing landmark Wall Street reform, health care reform, credit card reform, student loan reform … there is not an important thing that has happened in this administration that we’ve been able to accomplish for the American people that has not involved heavily his signature.”

Nevertheless, there are senior people in the Democratic Party who privately believe that Emanuel’s win-at-all-costs mentality is perfect for the rough and tumble world of Chicago politics, but it is not the best long-term approach for the president as he tries to bring the country together heading into his 2012 re-election battle.

That’s why there is a feeling among some top Democrats that Rouse may wind up being more than just an interim White House chief of staff.

According to this theory, a couple of months of Rouse on the job may show the president that for all of Emanuel’s successes, a more low-key manner may be the best way to approach the next two years with either a Republican Congress or a severely weakened Democratic Congress.

Think of Erskine Bowles, the equally quiet and self-effacing White House chief of staff who helped President Clinton forge some legislative victories, such as a balanced budget, with a hostile Republican Congress.

Rouse’s fans note to me that he spent a few decades as a powerful staffer on Capitol Hill, and was known as the “101st Senator” during his days as top aide to then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-South Dakota, because of his quiet influence behind the scenes. He became known for sharp political instincts, fierce loyalty and absolute discretion on sensitive matters.

It’s important to remember that Daschle has deep ties to Obama. They bonded during the 2004 Senate campaign season, when Obama was first elected while Daschle lost his re-election bid. Daschle encouraged Obama to hire Rouse, who wanted to try something new, but was coaxed out of it by the freshman senator who clearly had designs on higher office.

Daschle later became the first major Democrat to encourage Obama to actually run for president when others were laughing at the notion, and it was Rouse who then carefully put together the playbook. He later played important behind-the-scenes roles in the presidential campaign and the presidential transition, and his power has only grown inside the White House.

“There is a complete loyalty and trust with somebody like Pete,” Gibbs said. “Pete’s strategic sense has played a big part in the direction of virtually every big decision that’s made inside of this White House. So I think the type of trust that the president and others throughout this administration have in Pete is enormous.”

Rouse is a bachelor who rarely seems to mind the long hours he has to put in at the office. Friends note that one of the only nonwork things that he goes on and on about is his love for Maine coon cats, which are “large and energetic,” according to catfacts.org.

Emanuel certainly brought plenty of energy to the job. I just can’t imagine him being a cat lover — or even a puppy lover for that matter.

Henry in the House: Who Is Pete Rouse?

GOP unveils ‘Pledge to America’

Sterling, Virginia (CNN) — House Republicans sought to recapture the spirit of their 1994 election landslide Thursday, unveiling a 21-page “Pledge to America” that includes promises to slash taxes, cut government and reverse President Barack Obama’s health care reforms.

Among other things, House GOP leaders pledged to permanently extend all of the Bush-era tax cuts due to expire at the end of this year — including for individuals making over $250,000.

They also proposed giving small businesses a tax deduction equal to 20 percent of their income, while requiring Congress to review any new federal regulations that add to the deficit.

They pushed a domestic spending freeze, with the exception of certain politically sensitive programs such as veterans’ benefits.

While stressing the need to reduce spiraling deficits, they did not offer specifics on how to restrain the growth of entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

The document also lacks a pledge against unrelated pet projects that members of Congress often insert in spending bills to bring funding to their home districts — known as earmarks. Banning earmarks is typically a staple of Republican policy.

“The federal government is too big, it spends too much, and it’s out of control,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. The current federal government “isn’t listening” and “doesn’t get it.”

“Our government has failed us,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-California. “The land of opportunity has become the land of shrinking prosperity. … People are outraged.”

The House GOP leadership unveiled its proposal at a lumber company in northern Virginia.

Some provisions in the GOP document match positions of the conservative Tea Party movement that has helped defeat mainstream Republican candidates in several primary elections this year. For example, the document calls for a federal hiring freeze on nonsecurity employees and requiring all legislation to include a clause showing that it is authorized under the Constitution.

Other items would cancel unspent funding authorized by the economic stimulus bill, roll back spending to levels before the stimulus bill and earlier federal bailout legislation and repeal the health care reform bill passed in March.

The document also calls for permanently prohibiting taxpayer funding for abortion.

Several Republican sources said there was no intention to directly address social issues because the electorate is so heavily focused on jobs and spending.

Republican leaders settled on a line that states: “We pledge to honor families, traditional marriage, life, and the private and faith-based organizations that form the core of our American values.”

This language was a late addition, according to a GOP source, after conservative Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana argued that social issues should be included in the document representing the agenda of House Republicans.

The top Republican in the Senate immediately endorsed the plan, calling it a key step in the GOP’s push to cut the overall size of the federal government.

“The House Republican plan is a clear and forceful response to these concerns, and working together, House and Senate Republicans will continue to fight for the principles upon which it is based,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky.

House Democratic leaders, in contrast, said the document showed that Republicans want to return to what they called failed policies of the past. A statement from House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s office on Wednesday mocked the GOP positions, saying they showed that Republicans pledged allegiance to hedge fund managers on Wall Street, insurance companies, the “wealthiest of the wealthy,” oil companies and big corporations that outsource jobs, “with a recession and huge deficits for all.”

The GOP document represents an updated version of the 1994 “Contract with America.” That much shorter, 10-item document, with specific bills attached to each item that would be passed with a Republican victory, was rolled out on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and signed by GOP members of Congress and candidates.

The 2010 version has more than 20 items, including changes to how Congress works and broad policy goals such as tougher sanctions against Iran. While it does contain legislative proposals, it does not include specific bills that would be introduced and passed if Republicans gain control of the House.

A GOP lawmaker involved in putting together the document told CNN Wednesday that House Republicans realize voters are angry with both Democrats and Republicans. The agenda contained in the “Pledge to America” is intended to convince such voters that their concerns are taken seriously by Republicans, who will act differently if returned to power than they did when controlling Congress during parts of the Bush administration, the legislator said.

CNN’s Tom Cohen, Alan Silverleib and Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report

GOP unveils ‘Pledge to America’

Gingrich blasts Democratic establishment

Washington (CNN) — Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich repeatedly brought social conservatives to their feet Saturday with an impassioned address in which he warned that America faces a dual threat from the Democratic establishment on the one hand and Islamic terrorists on the other.

“We are at a point where our establishment is sliding into policies of such disastrous impact that they will in fact fundamentally challenge the survival of America as we know it,” Gingrich said during his speech to the fifth annual Values Voter Summit in Washington.

“On the one front we have a secular socialist machine led by (President) Obama, (House Speaker Nancy) Pelosi, and (Senate Majority Leader Harry) Reid, and on the other front we have radical Islamists who would fundamentally change this country into a system none of us in this room would recognize,” he continued to thunderous applause.

Gingrich, who has repeatedly acknowledged he is testing the waters in advance of a potential bid for president, largely stuck to red meat issues during his 30-minute speech before a gathering of activists who could play a crucial role in selecting the next Republican presidential candidate.

Gingrich also took aim at Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who recently sent a letter to insurance industry leaders warning them not to “falsely blame premium increases” on the recently passed health care legislation.

“If she’s going to represent left-wing thought police about Obamacare, she should be forced to resign by the new Congress,” he said.

Perhaps the former House Speaker’s loudest applause came when he weighed in on the controversial Islamic center and mosque proposed to be built near ground zero, declaring, “We as Americans don’t have to tolerate people who are supportive of violence against us, building something at the sight of the violence.”

“This is not about religious liberty, they want to build that mosque in the South Bronx, frankly they need the jobs,” he said. “But I am totally opposed to any effort to impose Sharia on the United States, and we should have a federal law that says under no circumstance, in any jurisdiction in the United States, will Sharia be used in any court to apply to any judgment made about American law.”

Sharia is considered the sacred law of Islam as set forth by the Quran and the Islamic Prophet Muhammad.

Gingrich also laid heavy praise on the “energy” of the Tea Party movement and its newest victor, Republican Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell in Delaware, who defeated longtime Congressman Mike Castle, considered a shoo-in before the election.

“I would beg Mike Castle to endorse Christine O’Donnell because she won fair and square in a process of representation. But let me go a step further, I am going to predict right now, Christine O’Donnell is going to win in Delaware.”

And he sharply derided Republican Lisa Murkowsi, the Alaska senator who announced Friday that she would mount an independent bid after losing to a Tea Party-backed candidate last month.

“Senator Murkowsi is fundamentally cheating,” he said. “If she wanted to run as an independent she should have.”

Gingrich’s speech comes on the second and final day of the gathering and hours before attendees will vote in a 2012 presidential straw poll — the results of which will be one indication of which potential White House hopeful can count on support from the social conservative faction of the party that is so vital in the primary process.

Gingrich followed a string of speakers Friday who constitute a veritable “who’s who” of rising Republican stars and potential 2012 presidential contenders, including Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana, Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, as well as O’Donnell from Delaware.

Gingrich blasts Democratic establishment

Obama speech setting sends message

Washington (CNN) — Before President Obama says a word during his Tuesday Oval Office address, the backdrop will make a statement for him: that he is the decider.

Obama is set to give his second Oval Office address, a speech meant to mark the end of combat missions in Iraq. But besides the remarks he will make, the setting of his speech will convey something, too.

“The Oval Office invokes the center of the presidential authority. That’s the president’s office, that’s where he supposedly makes decisions, where he governs,” says presidential historian Robert Dallek.

“[When] a talk to the nation is given from that office, [it] is underscoring his executive powers, his leadership.”

Video: U.S. combat role comes to an end

The Oval Office symbolizes power, command, and authority, Dallek said. It shows the president, “as George W. Bush put it, is the ‘decider’ ” and that symbolism is important.

For example, former President George H.W. Bush announced the start of the first Gulf war from the Oval Office, telling Americans and the world that he was the commander in chief just by setting the scene in the Oval Office.

And on the night of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, former President George W. Bush spoke to the American people from the Oval Office, to show he was in command and to reassure the nation.

Dallek points out the differences between giving a speech in the Oval Office versus a speech in a different venue.

For example, Obama’s speech in front of the joint session of Congress a year ago conveyed his desire to get Congress to act on health care reform.

“A joint session of Congress has a different function,” Dallek said. A speech in front of both the Senate and House shows the president is “trying to convince Congress to join with him.”

When Obama addressed both chambers in September 2009, the health care debate was still waging. He called for bipartisan proposals to address health care reform and focused attention on the issue, on Congress and on the presidency.

An Oval Office address is different. The prime-time address focuses the attention singularly on the subject matter.

“Presidents don’t give speeches from the Oval Office casually,” Dallek said. “It’s given with forethought and consideration. So the fact that he’s giving the current speech about the end of America’s combat role in Iraq is something that he wishes to emphasize and underscore and in a sense I think it’s a demonstration of his completion of his mission or fulfillment of a commitment that he made.”

Because of the singular focus on the subject matter during Obama’s Tuesday evening address, Obama will have to navigate the tricky road of marking the end of a war he did not support and honoring the lives of all the Americans killed in the war, Dallek said.

Obama must use a “certain amount of domestic diplomacy to bring the war to a close; you don’t just end the war and say it’s a mistake. It’s unpalatable because of all the deaths,” Dallek said.

So Obama must do it in a way that is “politically palatable to the American public — that is at the heart” of his address Tuesday, Dallek said.

The Oval Office will also help convey a sense of intimacy of the message. Since former President Jimmy Carter, each president has delivered his farewell address from that room, using the office of the presidency to say goodbye to the American public.

President Reagan used the intimate space to comfort the public after space shuttle Challenger exploded in 1986.

President Johnson used the room in 1968 to tell Americans he would not seek re-election and President Nixon gave several speeches regarding the Watergate scandal, including his decision to resign from the presidency in the wake of Watergate in 1974.

Obama’s other Oval Office address was two months ago to address the nation about the Gulf oil disaster.

And who does the presidential historian think was most successful at intimate talks to the American people?

Franklin Roosevelt’s fireside addresses — although there were no televisions at the time, these radio talks were effective in boosting the country’s confidence.

Obama speech setting sends message

Primary votes in Louisiana, West Virginia

(CNN) — Primary voters are set to head to the polls this weekend, this time in Louisiana and West Virginia.

In Louisiana, GOP Sen. David Vitter is expected to easily overcome a primary challenge Saturday in his first appearance on the ballot since a 2007 prostitution scandal.

In West Virginia, voters are choosing the Democratic and Republican nominees for a November special election to replace the late Sen. Robert Byrd, a Democrat.

Vitter is being opposed in the Republican primary by former state Supreme Court Justice Chet Traylor and Nick Accardo. Tulane University political science professor Brian Box said after Traylor’s last-minute entry into the race, “it seemed like it could be an interesting primary.”

When he announced his challenge, Traylor said that “we wouldn’t be in this position if we had a senator who could get results.” He ran a radio ad targeting Vitter over “family values,” and cited a Vitter aide’s arrest on domestic abuse charges.

But with little money and questions raised about Traylor’s past, Box said that, in the end, Traylor’s campaign “never became anything.”

With polls showing him holding a large lead, Vitter has spent most of his time in the primary focusing on the general election, not his Republican opposition.

Vitter’s advertising “is almost entirely against [likely Democratic nominee Charlie] Melancon,” Box said. “There was nothing against Republicans.”

Melancon, the congressman from Louisiana’s 3rd District outside New Orleans, is the favorite in the Democratic Senate primary against Cary Deaton and Neeson Chauvin.

The nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report rates the general election as “favored Republican.”

Several U.S. House primaries are also on the Louisiana ballot, including the race for candidates seeking Melancon’s seat. Republicans believe they have a chance to pick up the seat, the only one in the state currently in Democratic hands. Box said three major Republican candidates have been competing, “trying to out-tea party each other.”

Meanwhile, four Democrats are competing to challenge vulnerable GOP Rep. Joseph Cao in his New Orleans district. The race has been targeted by national Democrats as a seat considered vulnerable in November. The seat was held by Democrats until Cao was elected to replace former Rep. William Jefferson, who is serving a 13-year prison term after his conviction on corruption charges.

Cao initially voted with House Democrats on health care reform, but voted against the final version of the bill.

“Cao is in a lot of trouble,” Box said. Democrats have focused “so much on defending turf, [but] this is a chance for a pickup.”

In West Virginia, both parties will select nominees for the general election race for the seat of Byrd, who was serving his ninth term in the Senate when he died in June at age 92.

Gov. Joe Manchin is expected to win the Democratic nomination over two opponents, including 95-year-old Ken Hechler. Hechler was a four-term secretary of state and represented West Virginia in the U.S. House from 1959 to 1977.

On the GOP side, 10 candidates are competing for the nomination, including businessman John Raese, who was defeated by Byrd in 2006.

Primary votes in Louisiana, West Virginia

To-do list: Your ideas for Obama, GOP

(CNN) — Strategists on both sides of the political aisle weighed in this week on what President Obama and Republicans must do before the November midterms to give their parties a boost.

The 10-week to-do lists resulted in thousands of comments and suggestions from CNN readers, ranging from constructive to highly critical.

Readers suggested Obama look for a new job and put a muzzle on Vice President Joe Biden, while commenters providing advice for the GOP recommended a muzzle for former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Mouth guards aside, readers also offered up practical guidance for Obama and the GOP. Here are some of the suggestions:

1. For Obama: Govern from the center

CNN readers say they want to see Obama get behind a more bipartisan agenda. The No. 1 thing they want to see is job creation, and they don’t want partisan games to get in the way.

Commenters advised Obama to not be influenced by those on the far left and instead focus on what the American public wants.

2. Tout the administration’s accomplishments

Supporters of the health care legislation passed this year say they’re proud of it — and they want Obama to talk about it more. “Talk up Healthcare, because so many supported the bill!” one commenter suggested.

Strategists’ advice for Obama

1. Simplify the message
2. Channel Ronald Reagan
3. Propagandize the truth
4. Go on the offense
5. Put up a fight
6. Be positive
7. Look to the future, not the past
8. Pay attention to independents
9. Be prepared for Election Day …
10. … but don’t stop at November
Read more

Obama signed the health care bill in March after a long, emotional debate in Congress. Now that the dust has settled, backers of the bill want to hear all about it.

“Talk about what you have done, and what you would like to do, and why,” another reader wrote.

3. Rise above the partisan bickering

“Quit politicking which further divides our nation,” one commenter posted.

Readers say they are sick of partisan games getting in the way of action on Capitol Hill — and they want the administration to stay out of the mudslinging.

4. Shake up the staff

Commenters are ready for some fresh faces. Even those supportive of Obama say they are ready for him to reload the strategy and bring in some new staffers.

Strategists’ advice for Republicans

1. Focus on jobs, jobs, jobs
2. Become the party of solutions, not “no”
3. Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
4. Offense is the best defense
5. Offer a “Contract with a America” Part II
6. Embrace tea party support with caution
7. Avoid social issues
8. Appeal to independents
9. Channel Bill Clinton (yes, Bill Clinton)
10. Turn the Bush blame game around
Read more

5. Stay out of local issues

Readers say the want to see more presidential leadership from Obama. They want him to avoid getting involved with local issues and distractions and focus on the job at hand.

“Be a leader, be positive, plan for success, stay focused,” one reader said.

1. For Republicans: Steer clear of the far right commentators

Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter are doing more harm than good for the GOP, some commenters warned.

Readers say they want Republicans to avoid accepting what’s meant to be shock-jock entertainment as sound advice for the party.

2. Keep religion out of politics

“I’m a conservative person, and I’m all for people believing what they want to, but please keep it out of your politics,” one commenter posted.

Readers say they want Republicans to focus on issues such as jobs and the economy instead of trying to prove who is the better Christian.

3. Be conservative, but be bipartisan

Some commenters say that while they like conservatives, not all Republicans fit the bill. Readers say they want lawmakers to stick to their conservative ideas, with an understanding that working with Democrats instead of against them will be more productive.

4. Represent your constituents, not your party’s agenda

“The only thing I want to see from either party is a return to REPRESENTING THEIR CONSTITUENTS, not their party,” a reader said. “When your constituents in large numbers oppose a bill, your obligation is to them.”

“I’m tired of politicians being elected and then ignoring what their constituents want or don’t want. Suddenly the only thing they care about is party support,” the reader continued.

Commenters want their elected officials to listen to them instead of being afraid of breaking with the party.

“Show the American people that you’re capable of putting them ahead of your party,” one person said.

5. Tell the voters what will be different if Republicans take power

“Republicans are going to take back the House and Senate, and it will change absolutely nothing,” one reader said, arguing that both parties are controlled by special interests.

Voters want to know how things would change if Republicans had the majority.

Do you have more suggestions for President Obama or lawmakers? Weigh in below.

To-do list: Your ideas for Obama, GOP

Conservatives accuse WH of circumventing immigration laws

Washington (CNN) — A group of conservative activists slammed the Obama administration Monday for allegedly planning to use its administrative authority to undercut immigration restrictions in the wake of congressional inaction on a comprehensive reform bill.

In a letter sent to the White House, leaders of 17 conservative grass-roots organizations cited reports that the administration is considering using its executive power “to effectively legalize significant numbers of illegal aliens.”

“We strongly urge that you refrain pursuing that tactic,” they wrote. “We believe that such an abuse of power would further polarize the immigration issue, which already is so controversial that reasonable discussion is confounded.”

Only Congress, they argued, “possesses plenary power over making our immigration policy. The administrative branch has limited discretion for dealing with aliens and quite limited policymaking authority.”

The letter, which also cites “abuses of the legislative process” during the health care debate, was signed by members of the Eagle Forum, Judicial Watch, the Family Research Council and a Washington-area segment of the Tea Party movement, among others.

The White House has “come up with a back door plan to bypass the Congress and the American people,” Colin Hanna, head of the group Let Freedom Ring, said at a news conference Monday.

“The administration is terrified that the illegal immigrant population is going to go down further because they want to keep them here in order to give them the amnesty and turn them into voters,” alleged Roy Beck, head of NumbersUSA, which favors tighter immigration restrictions.

At issue is an internal Department of Homeland Security memo outlining multiple options for assisting illegal immigrants in the absence of new legislation.

The 11-page document, titled “Administrative Alternatives to Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” describes how to reduce the threat of removal for some undocumented immigrants through various administrative and regulatory changes. It characterizes one potential change as “a non-legislative version of amnesty.”

Among other things, the document describes a draft proposal to “extend benefits and/or protections” to individuals currently “present in the United States without authorization.”

It also mentions the possibility of “deferred action,” defined as “an exercise of prosecutorial discretion.”

The document, initially obtained by GOP Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, indicates the suggestions have the “potential to result in meaningful immigration reform” without congressional action. It acknowledges, however, a broad price tag if the ideas are adopted without restraint.

“While it is theoretically possible to grant deferred action to an unrestricted number of unlawfully present individuals, doing so would likely be controversial, not to mention expensive,” the document says.

Representatives of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — the Homeland Security agency responsible for drafting the memo — indicated in a statement last month that the document was merely brainstorming.

“Internal memos do not and should not be equated with official action or policy,” the statement noted. The Homeland Security Department “will not grant deferred action or humanitarian parole to the nation’s entire illegal immigrant population.”

CNN’s Alan Silverleib contributed to this report

Conservatives accuse WH of circumventing immigration laws

Obama mosque issue a gift for GOP

Washington (CNN) — By wading into the issue of an Islamic center and mosque near ground zero, President Barack Obama provided Republicans with an emotion-ridden attack vehicle while diverting attention from campaign themes of fellow Democrats.

A senior Republican strategist told CNN that GOP candidates are being encouraged to talk about the issue as much as possible.

In Florida, Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott launched a statewide television ad Monday criticizing Obama for backing the right of Muslims to build an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from where the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks killed more than 2,700 people.

“Barack Obama says building a mosque at ground zero is about tolerance,” Scott says in the ad, looking directly into the camera. “He’s wrong. It’s about truth.”

The “truth,” Scott claims, is this: “Muslim fanatics murdered thousands of innocent Americans on 9/11, just yards from the proposed mosque.”

“The fight against terrorism isn’t over,” Scott concludes. “Mr. President, ground zero is the wrong place for a mosque.”

Video: Obama’s comments stir debate

Video: Lawmakers react to Obama remarks

Video: Obama mum on ‘wisdom’ of center

Video: CNN poll: Most oppose mosque

Meanwhile, a House Democratic leadership aide said the issue was dominating the political conversation when Democrats need to stress campaign themes such as economic recovery and saving social security.

“We understand why the president would want to talk about this issue, but the timing couldn’t have been any worse,” the House Democratic leadership aide told CNN.

Despite the concerns of Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada on Monday came out against building the Islamic center and mosque.

“The First Amendment protects freedom of religion. Sen. Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else,” said a statement issued by Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley.

Reid is involved in a tough re-election campaign against conservative Republican Sharron Angle. The statement on the ground zero issue also called for Republicans to back a Democratic bill that would provide health care aid and compensation for firefighters, police officers and other first responders to the 9/11 attacks.

For its part, the White House sought to tamp down the discussion Monday. Speaking to reporters, White House spokesman Bill Burton sidestepped a question on Republican strategy and tried to declare the debate over.

“The president didn’t do this because of the politics,” Burton said, adding: “I think that it’s a debate that was had and we’ve weighed in.”

On Sunday, the topic dominated morning talk shows, with Republicans calling Obama insensitive for supporting the right of Muslims to build the Islamic center so close to ground zero.

Some predicted political repercussions for Democrats in November’s congressional election, even though they agreed with Obama that freedom of religion is a vital part of American democracy.

“The Muslims have, as everyone else does, the right to practice their religion and they have the right to construct a mosque at ground zero if they wish,” Rep. Peter King, R-New York, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “What I’m saying, though, is they should listen to public opinion, they should listen to the deep wounds and anguish this is causing to so many good people.”

Republican strategist Ed Rollins, a senior political contributor to CNN, summed up the GOP perspective.

“Intellectually, the president may be right, but this is an emotional issue, and people who lost kids, brothers, sisters, fathers, what have you, do not want that mosque in New York, and it’s going to be a big, big issue for Democrats across this country,” Rollins said on the CBS program “Face the Nation.”

On the same program, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine challenged the Republican logic.

“You know, we see an awful lot of Republicans going out and saying we’ve got to respect the Constitution, and that means we have to respect it,” Kaine said. “We can’t tarnish people’s First Amendment rights.”

Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania said on the CBS program that the Islamic center issue shouldn’t have political resonance.

“I can’t imagine that any American — given the challenges facing this country — is going to vote based on what he said about the mosque,” Rendell said of the November election. “The mosque is an unfortunate situation, but we do have a right to practice our religion freely wherever we choose. Rights are not subject to the popular vote or majority vote.”

In his speech at a White House dinner Friday marking the start of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, Obama said Muslims “have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country.”

“That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” the president added.

The next day, Obama told CNN Chief White House Correspondent Ed Henry that he was “not commenting on the wisdom” of the project, just the broader principle that the government should treat “everyone equal, regardless” of religion.

His comments were considered by some to backtrack from what he said at the dinner, prompting a White House spokesman to further clarify the president’s remarks later Saturday.

Both the topic and Obama’sneed to clarify his initial remarks evoked criticism from Republicans.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told “FOX News Sunday” that Obama’s stance demonstrated how “Washington, the White House, the administration, the president himself seems to be disconnected from the mainstream of America.”

“This is sort of the dichotomy that people sense, that they’re being lectured to — not listened to — and I think that’s the reason why a lot of people are very upset with Washington,” Cornyn said.

On the CNN program, King said Obama’s lack of clarity further muddied the issue.

“If the president was going to get into this, he should have been much more clear, much more precise, and you can’t be changing your position from day to day on an issue which does go to our Constitution, and it also goes to extreme sensitivity,” King said.

Democrats responded that critics fail to distinguish between the al Qaeda terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks and the Islam religion, which includes peaceful adherents all over the world, including the United States.

“It is only insensitive if you regard Islam as the culprit as opposed to al Qaeda as the culprit,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, said on the CNN program. “We were not attacked by all Muslims. …. There were Muslims killed there. There were Muslims who ran in as first responders to help.”

The issue was one of personal rights, not political popularity, Nadler said, adding: “We do not put the Bill of Rights, we do not put the religious freedom to a vote.”

The House Democratic leadership aide lamented that the topic was getting so much attention.

“We were supposed to be talking about Social Security in this coming week,” the aide said, referring to Democratic criticism of Republican calls to privatize the government-run pension program. “This is a really good issue for us. And instead, we’re talking about the mosque.”

Obama’s remarks Friday drew praise from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who announced his support for the Islamic center last week. Bloomberg compared Obama’s speech to a letter former President George Washington wrote more than two centuries ago in support of a Jewish congregation in Newport, Rhode Island.

In the speech, Obama called the 9/11 attacks “a deeply traumatic event for our country.”

“The pain and suffering experienced by those who lost loved ones is unimaginable,” Obama continued. “So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. Ground zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.”

The Islamic center’s leaders say they plan to build the $100 million, 13-story facility called Cordoba House two blocks from the site of the 9/11 attacks. The developer, Sharif el-Gamal, describes the project as an “Islamic community center” that would include a 500-seat performing arts center, a lecture hall, a swimming pool, a gym, a culinary school, a restaurant and a prayer space for Muslims.

Nearly 70 percent of Americans oppose the plan, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll released Wednesday.

CNN’s Mark Preston contributed to this story

Obama mosque issue a gift for GOP

Blagojevich jury may be deadlocked on some counts

(CNN) — A federal jury weighing the fate of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich in his corruption trial telegraphed Wednesday it may be deadlocked on some counts of the indictment.

“In a situation where all the jurors cannot agree on all counts what should the next step be? We must now ask for guidance?” the jury asked U.S. District Judge James Zagel.

The judge responded, “It is permissible for a jury to return a verdict on some counts and not all counts” and told it to continue deliberations.

Blagojevich faces 24 counts, including racketeering, wire fraud, attempted extortion and bribery. The two-term Democrat was removed from office in January 2009 amid accusations that he attempted to sell the U.S. Senate seat that had been occupied by Barack Obama before he became president.

In one conversation recorded by federal agents, he told an aide, “I’ve got this thing, and it’s [expletive] golden. I’m just not giving it up for [expletive] nothing.”

Conviction on the count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud would carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, while a conviction on the count of solicitation of bribery would carry a maximum sentence of 10 years.

The former governor’s brother, Robert Blagojevich, testified last week that the governor was “trying to politically work something to his benefit” in handling the appointment but was thinking in terms of political horse-trading, not corruption.

“It didn’t seem out of the ordinary, because Obama was taking a lot of people from Illinois with him to D.C.,” said Robert Blagojevich, who raised money for his brother. He said the governor “was interested in the idea of being the head of Health and Human Services.”

Robert Blagojevich is charged with wire fraud, extortion conspiracy, attempted extortion and bribery conspiracy and is on trial with his brother.

While awaiting trial, the ousted governor asserted his innocence in interviews and on Twitter, as well as during his appearances on the “Celebrity Apprentice” reality show.

CNN’s Katherine Wojtecki contributed to this article.

Blagojevich jury may be deadlocked on some counts

‘Birther’ soldier a decorated surgeon

(CNN) — Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin is a poster soldier for the so-called birther movement, but for 17 years prior to his court-martial proceedings, the flight surgeon served around the globe, racking up a chest full of medals.

Military prosecutors allege that the Colorado native intentionally missed a plane in April after disobeying four lawful orders from superiors. Lakin has said he refused to deploy to Afghanistan until he sees proof that President Obama was born in the U.S.

In a YouTube explanation posted before he was charged, Lakin said he had no choice but the “distasteful one of inviting my own court-martial.”

“If [Obama] is ineligible, then indeed, all orders are illegal because all orders have the origin with the commander in chief,” he said.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice says the maximum punishment for both offenses — missing his plane and disobeying lawful orders — is a dishonorable discharge and up to two years in confinement. A guilty verdict could also result in forfeiture of his pay, which totals $7,959 a month, according to a charge sheet provided by a group sponsoring his defense.

Lakin is among 27 percent of Americans who doubt or deny that Obama is American-born, according to a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll. They compose the birther movement, which demands that Obama present a birth certificate signed by the doctor who delivered him in 1961.

Obama has made public an unsigned “certification of live birth,” which birthers claim is not the same as a birth certificate. However, two Honolulu, Hawaii, newspapers have presented birth announcements for Obama, and the state’s Republican governor has confirmed that the president was born in the Aloha State.

In December, Col. Robin Swope, chief of the Army’s administrative law division, told Lakin in a letter that his Article 138 complaint, the avenue by which troops report perceived wrongs by their commanding officers, was “deficient.”

The complaint incorrectly targeted Gen. George Casey, Army chief of staff, Swope wrote. Not only was Casey not Lakin’s commanding officer, Swope wrote, but “the wrongs you complain of relate to matters of law and not the discretionary acts or omissions of a commanding officer.”

Video: Some doubt Obama was born in U.S.

Video: Obama birth certificate demanded

Video: The GOP’s ‘birther problem’

Lakin wrote Obama in March, saying presidential contender Sen. John McCain willingly provided his own birth certificate and accusing the president of failing to do the same. Lakin alleges in the letter that Kenyan citizens claim Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya’s second-largest city.

He further wrote that the birth certification provided by Obama is merely a 2007 computer-generated testament that the original birth certificate is on file.

“An original birth certificate is the underlying document that presumably includes a hospital and attending physician’s or midwife’s name that should lay to rest the ‘natural born’ dispute,” Lakin wrote.

Until such a document is provided, the letter said, “I cannot in good conscience obey ANY military orders.”

In his YouTube statement, Lakin called the privacy invasion inherent in producing the birth certificate “minimal.”

Addressing Obama directly in the video, he said that providing such a document is the only means by which “I and all other servicemembers may then continue to serve our country at risk of injury or the ultimate sacrifice, knowing we do so for our country, the Constitution and a legitimate leader of the greatest free republic ever.”

On the campaign trail this year, politicians have used the issue of Obama’s birth when it resonates with their constituents. It has backfired regularly, as many of their opponents have used it against them.

One group that has not wavered in its insistence that Obama was born abroad is the American Patriot Foundation, which is collecting donations for Lakin’s legal defense.

The group has devoted significant space on its “Safeguard our Constitution” website to Lakin’s case. Under a banner proclaiming, “The Truth Matters,” the group says Lakin is being targeted unfairly for making a legitimate request.

Lakin, according to the foundation, was a model soldier before he began questioning Obama’s birthplace in October 2008.

He served in Afghanistan (under President George W. Bush), Korea, Bosnia, Germany, Honduras and El Salvador before taking up an occupational and environmental medicine residency in Maryland, according to a service record provided by the Army and a r