Tag Archives: government

Republicans blast Obama amid Democratic Party tension

Washington (CNN) — Republicans wasted no time Thursday in calling out President Obama and Democrats for their handling of the economy, warning the country should not follow the Democratic Party down the road to ruin.

“It is time this administration and its Capitol Hill ally stop this job-killing agenda,” Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said at a press conference with other Republican senators.

Obama is simply “out of touch with the American people and out of touch with the economic realities of our country in the summer of 2010,” said Sen. John Barasso, R-Wyoming.

The Obama administration is fighting back, touting Wednesday’s economic stimulus report, which says the government paid out the largest chunk of stimulus funds so far in the second quarter of 2010 — $116.3 billion — which includes both spending on projects and tax cuts to businesses.

The administration said the the $787 billion stimulus is working and has already saved or created about 3 million jobs. Obama is now calling this the “Summer of Recovery.”

Republicans, meanwhile, argue that the 9.5 percent unemployment rate is evidence that the country is not seeing a “Summer of Recovery.”

The top GOP leader in the House is also targeting the Wall Street Reform Bill, which is expected to be passed by the Senate Thursday.

Video: ‘I think we’ll retain House,’ Gibbs says

Video: Battle for the house

House Minority Leader John Boehner said he liked some things about the bill.

“There are common sense things that you should do to plug the holes in the regulatory system that were there, and to bring more transparency to financial transactions, because transparency is like sunlight. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”

But Boehner still thinks the bill should be repealed because it is “ill-conceived” and will “make credit harder for the American people to get, clearly harder for businesses to get and … punish every banker in America for the sins of the few on Wall Street.”

Pelosi’s spokesman Nadeam Elshami immediately slammed Boehner’s comments in a statement, saying “This comes as no surprise coming from the Republican House leader who called the financial crisis that caused 8 million Americans to lose their jobs an ‘ant.’ “

In addition to the economy, Republicans are smelling blood in the wake of recent comments made by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on the midterm election.

Gibbs said on Sunday that he thinks there is “no doubt there are enough seats in play — that could cause Republicans to gain control.”

The comments were blasted by top Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer — and seized on by Boehner.

“The panic that’s building amongst Democrats erupted into a full scale civil war this week when the president’s spokesman suggested that his party could lose the House this fall,” Boehner said Thursday. “I understand that the House Democrats are angry because they see the White House throwing them under the bus.”

“With all the trouble the House Democrats are in right now, [it] was really only a matter of time before the gloves came off. I just didn’t know that the targets would be each other,” he said.

Pelosi and others expressed frustration over Gibbs’ comments which were seen by some as helpful to Republicans, according to senior Democratic officials.

It’s one thing for a pundit to state the obvious about the state of play in the election and quite another for a top White House official to offer an assessment that may depress the party’s base just as officials hope to start revving liberals up, the officials said.

Many lawmakers also said that after expressing their frustration, they now want to turn the page and did not plan to rail against the president himself, a senior administration official told CNN.

The White House is also feeling the heat from liberal Democrats who say Obama has not been aggressive enough in pursuing their agenda.

Obama senior adviser David Axelrod responded to those critics Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union. “My admonition would be: Don’t make the perfect the enemy of the good,” he said.

“We’ve achieved more in these two years — in terms of advancing a solid progressive agenda for this country that will help working families and make this a better, more balanced economy — than anyone has done … in our generation.”

He pointed to comprehensive health care reform, the administration’s move to boost fuel efficiency standards and the president’s desire to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays and lesbians serving in the U.S. military, as part of that agenda.

But those legislative items are also providing fodder for Republicans.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking on Thursday to a group of young Republicans, said the midterm election will be a referendum on those policies.

“You’re here at a time of the explosion of government,” McConnell said. “The people who think what’s wrong with America is that we just haven’t gotten a big enough government … we’re going to have an opportunity to see how the American people feel about that in a few months, because they’ll get their report card.”

CNN’s Martina Stewart and Deirdre Walsh, along with CNNMoney.com’s Annalyn Censky, contributed to this report.

Republicans blast Obama amid Democratic Party tension

Obama, Netanyahu emphasize strength of U.S.-Israel ties

Washington (CNN) — U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeatedly emphasized the strength and durability of ties between their two countries Tuesday — part of an effort to dispel the notion that relations between the United States and Israel have frayed in recent months.

They said they had discussed new steps that can be taken to revitalize a Middle East peace process that many observers believe has recently stalled.

The two leaders also took aim at Iran, highlighting common efforts to prevent that country from acquiring a nuclear arsenal.

The meeting — their fifth since Netanyahu took office last spring — took place at the White House against a backdrop of speculation that the two leaders are increasingly at odds on a range of key issues.

The “bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable,” Obama told reporters in the Oval Office. The United States remains “unwavering in our commitment to Israel’s security.”

Reports of damaged relations between Israel and the United States “aren’t just premature, they’re just flat wrong,” Netanyahu insisted.

Video: Netanyahu in Washington

Video: Obama to meet with Israeli PM

Video: Middle East peace process reviewed

Video: Peace process reviewed

The two leaders made a point of publicly shaking hands twice, and Netanyahu thanked Obama for offering support in both private talks and public comments.

Obama, however, also stressed the importance of moving toward direct talks between the Israelis and Palestinians. Presently, Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas aren’t talking directly. They are communicating only through U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell, who serves as a go-between for negotiations.

Moving toward direct talks was a topic when Obama met with Abbas on June 9.

“We agreed that, should a progress be achieved, then we would move on to direct talks,” Abbas said after that meeting.

Netanyahu said Tuesday that he is ready for direct talks — a step he has repeatedly endorsed in the past.

Abbas has refused to meet with Netanyahu until Israel promises to stop building settlements. Israel’s settlement policy has become point of friction between Israel and the United States.

Relations between Obama and Netanyahu reached a low point in March, when Israel announced plans during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden to construct more than 1,000 new houses in East Jerusalem. The announcement outraged the Obama administration and led to the Palestinians’ withdrawing from agreed-upon indirect negotiations with Israel.

In a visit later that month to the United States, Netanyahu was presented with a set of concessions that the White House wanted to see Israel make in an effort to restart the negotiations.

Neither government detailed what the exact nature of the concessions were, but sources on both sides said a halt in East Jerusalem construction was among the demands from the Obama administration.

Also on the agenda: Israel’s controversial embargo blocking the flow of goods into Gaza, which turned deadly in May when Israeli forces stormed a vessel that was part of a Gaza-bound humanitarian flotilla. At least nine people were killed.

Obama on Tuesday commended Israel for easing limits on goods going to Gaza, saying there had been “real progress on the ground” that was happening “more quickly and more effectively than many people anticipated.”

The president said the United States wants to “ensure the people of Gaza are able to prosper economically while Israel is able to maintain its legitimate security needs in not allowing missiles and weapons to get to Hamas.”

Aside from Israeli-Palestinian relations, many Israelis worry about Iran’s intentions with its nuclear program. Netanyahu had been expected to urge Obama to keep the pressure on Tehran.

Netanyahu said Tuesday that recent sanctions adopted by United Nations are helping to delegitimize Iran’s nuclear program. The sanctions “have teeth” and “bite,” he asserted.

CNN’s Fred Pleitgen, Dan Lothian and Jamie Crawford contributed to this report.

Obama, Netanyahu emphasize strength of U.S.-Israel ties

Healthcare.gov: How to figure out your health care options

By

Peter Grier,

Kagan, senators to square off again

Washington (CNN) — Questioning of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan will continue Wednesday after she mounted a spirited defense against her critics Tuesday.

The Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. ET. By late morning the committee could go into closed session where Kagan’s FBI background check is likely to be discussed as has been the practice in past hearings.

On the second day of the hearing, which is expected to last throughout the week, Kagan expressed a judicial philosophy of impartiality and equality, saying the courts provide a “level playing field” for all and advocating for televising high court proceedings.

She was also able to use humor to disarm some tough questioners.

Kagan’s funny asides during 10 hours of questioning appeared spontaneous, and colleagues say that is her style: someone who is serious about the law but who enjoys a good laugh, often at her expense.

Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pennsylvania, quizzed Kagan on a favorite topic of his– allowing cameras in the Supreme Court, which most justices oppose.

Video: Kagan: Politics separate from judging

Video: Kagan talks Harvard and the military

Video: Kagan talks Second Amendment

“It means I’d have to get my hair done more often, Sen. Specter,” Kagan replied.

The senator paused and appeared not to immediately get the joke. But he quickly recovered.

“Let me commend you on that last comment and I say that seriously,” he said to laughter in the room. “You have shown a real admirable sense of humor and I think that’s really important. … We are looking for somebody who could moderate the court, and a little humor would do a lot of good.”

Some Republican committee members had used their opening statements to depict Kagan as a deficient nominee because of her lack of judicial experience and the advocacy positions she has held in the Clinton and Obama administrations.

They continued that theme in their direct questioning, with the sharpest exchange occurring between Kagan and Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the committee, over Kagan’s role in limiting military recruiters at Harvard Law School because of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that bars openly gay and lesbian soldiers from military service.

Sessions said Kagan, who was the law school dean, sought to treat the military as second class by denying recruiters access to the campus Office of Career Services and instead requiring them to use the veterans services office.

“We were trying to ensure that military recruiters had full and complete access to our students, but we also were trying to protect our anti-discrimination policy,” she said, explaining recruiters still had access to students through the separate office.

Pressed by Sessions, Kagan said, “I do oppose ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’” Sessions cut her off, saying, “And you did then.”

“And I did then,” Kagan said.

Kagan added that she reveres and honors military service, but Sessions said her position is “unconnected to reality” because of her actions against recruiters.

Overall, Kagan came across as confident and assertive, gesturing with her hands as she spoke and referring easily to case law when making points. She repeatedly assured the senators that she would be an impartial judge, saying her past political work was required of her government jobs.

If confirmed as expected by the 19-member committee and then the full Senate, Kagan would be the 112th Supreme Court justice and the fourth woman to sit on the nation’s highest court.

CNN’s Bill Mears contributed to this report.

Kagan, senators to square off again

Obama more emotional on fatherhood in 2008

Washington (CNN) — The day after official Father’s Day festivities, President Obama used his bully pulpit to stress the importance of responsible parenting at events in Washington.

The commander in chief, or perhaps father in chief, said Monday that, “without hesitation, the most challenging, most fulfilling, most important job I will have during my time on this Earth is to be Sasha and Malia’s father.”

Obama marks Father’s Day with launch of mentoring program

On Father’s Day 2008, Obama took a more pointed tone when delivering a controversial speech on fatherhood. Before a predominantly African-American audience, then-candidate Obama chastised absentee fathers, specifically addressing black men in the community, saying, “We need fathers to realize that responsibility does not end at conception. …Too many fathers are MIA, too many fathers are AWOL, missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men.”

Obama continues to talk openly about being abandoned by his father as a child. During my interview with him in July 2008, the candidate unleashed the kind of raw emotion, insight and color we rarely see from him today as president.

Video: Obama: ‘Be a good father’

RELATED TOPICS

Here is our conversation:

Suzanne Malveaux: Your father was largely absent, how did that impact you?

Barack Obama: Well, you know, I think it had a profound impact except, you know, more as an object lesson of what it’s like growing up without a father in the house.

My father had a reputation of being this larger than life figure: charismatic, very smart and very engaging. And all of those things were true. He was part of that first generation of Africans who moved West to get an education and intended to bring it back to develop their country. And he made a great impression on people, but he also was a tragic figure not only because he didn’t stay with my mother and me, but he generally had trouble providing stability for his other children and his subsequent wives. And he was somebody who was incredibly brilliant, but also because of the tensions from leaping from a small African village to Harvard and being part of this modern world, he never resolved those tensions.

He fought, when he got back to Kenya, against tribalism and nepotism, but was ultimately consumed by it and blackballed from the government, ended up having a serious drinking problem, was in a severe car accident and ended up dying a tragic and bitter man.

So when I think about his impact on me there are some superficial things. He went to take me, when I was 10 years old, to see a jazz concert, and I became a real jazz buff after that. He gave me my first basketball, and it was only later that I realized that that had been the case and might have been part of the reason why I became so obsessed with playing basketball. But for the most part what I understood from him was an absence, and I vowed that when I became a father one of the most important things that I could is be a presence in my children’s lives.

Malveaux: That visit when you were 10 years old at that time — was there anything in your 10-year-old mind that you thought you could do to get him to stay?

Obama: No, I don’t think that’s how 10-year-olds think. If you’ve got this person that suddenly shows up and says, “I’m your father and I’m going to tell you what to do,” and you don’t have any sense of who this person is and you don’t necessarily have a deep bond of trust with him. I don’t think your reaction is how do I get him to stay? I think the reaction may be, what’s this guy doing here? And who does he think he is?

So it was only during the course of that month, by the end of that month that I started to open myself up to understanding who he was, but then he was gone. I never saw him again. That was the last time I saw him. He would write to me occasionally. He wrote me letters, and we would talk on the phone intermittently, but it was not until I traveled to Kenya and heard from relatives of who he had been and the story that he had lived that I think that I fully was able to understand him and obviously in some ways understand myself.

Malveaux: You said, “Every man is trying to live up to his father’s expectations or make up for his mistakes and in my case both may be true.” Can you explain?

Obama: If you don’t have a father there, it means you’re always grappling against this image that you don’t fully understand. If you have a father in the house, you’re going to have arguments; there are going to be tensions, you’re going to see his flaws but also see his good qualities, and so there’s something very concrete against which you can learn from and match up to.

In my case, you had this person who was almost a myth in our family about how smart he was, about how well he did in school, how well-spoken he was and so forth. So that was something to live up to — high expectations.

On the other hand, here’s somebody who wasn’t there and that I would come to learn was an alcoholic and somebody who had not treated his family well. So that was something that you felt that you had to make up for. And I think that certainly in the early part of my life grappling with that legacy was part of who I was and is still part of who I am.

Obama more emotional on fatherhood in 2008

Obama names rest of Gulf disaster commission

Washington (CNN) — President Barack Obama on Monday announced the remaining five members of a commission he appointed to investigate the BP Gulf of Mexico oil disaster.

A White House statement said Obama named Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council; Donald Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Sciences; Terry Garcia, executive vice president for mission programs for the National Geographic Society; Cherry Murray, dean of the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences; and Frances Ulmer, chancellor of the University of Alaska-Anchorage.

Obama previously appointed former U.S. Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, a Democrat, and former Environmental Protection Agency administrator William Reilly, a Republican, as co-chairman of the seven-member commission.

“These individuals bring tremendous expertise and experience to the critical work of this commission,” Obama said in Monday’s statement. “I am grateful they have agreed to serve as we work to determine the causes of this catastrophe and implement the safety and environmental protections we need to prevent a similar disaster from happening again.”

The commission established by executive order will look at how the devastating oil spill happened, how the government and BP responded, and how to avoid situations like it again in the future. Obama set a deadline of the end of 2010 for the commission to complete its work.

Obama names rest of Gulf disaster commission

‘Cash for clunkers’ slows car donations to charities

The latest buzz in L.A.’s car culture.

August 12, 2009 – Daniel Saltman 9:01 am

= Junk_yard-320 You used to hear it all the time. Whenever someone raised the question of what to do with a near-worthless rust bucket, the answer almost always came back the same — donate it to charity.

Since the arrival of “cash for clunkers,” however, donations have dropped off. It’s not hard to imagine why — a $3,500 or $4,500 voucher is certainly more appetizing to the cash-strapped recession-era new car shopper than a tax writeoff come year’s end.

The damage has not been insignificant. According to the Associated Press, a Texas-based charity estimates that the cash for clunkers program has already cost it $75,000 in missed vehicle donations. Unfortunately, instead of being sold for charity funds or turned over to needy families, formerly donation-worthy cars will be sent to the crusher with seized engines, per the program’s stringent guidelines.

Despite a slowdown since its inception, the federal program has succeeded in sending consumers to dealerships. According to a survey of 517 in-market shoppers by Kelley Blue Book (KBB), the cash for clunkers program has persuaded 1 in 10 shoppers to purchase a new vehicle sooner. Taking into account that many trade-ins don’t qualify for the cash for clunkers voucher, charities may see some relief yet. But when you consider that owners of particularly rundown vehicles will be looking at either a low-value tax writeoff or a $4,500 discount on a new car, the decision-making process becomes pretty clear.

Thinking of donating a clunker of your own? Check out this firsthand experience of a Land Rover-to-Nissan Cube swap and get an idea of what you’ll be dealing with.

– Brian Alexander

Brian Alexander is a staff writer at DriverSide.com