Tag Archives: georgia

Shirley Sherrod to meet with Vilsack about a job

(CNN) — Shirley Sherrod, who received an apology after being forced to resign from the Agriculture Department, will meet Tuesday with Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to discuss a job offer, a department official confirmed Saturday.

It will be the first face-to-face meeting between the two since a controversial sequence of events last month culminated in her stepping down.

Sherrod, who was the Agriculture Department’s Georgia Director of Rural Development, has said she is being offered the position of deputy director of the Office of Advocacy and Outreach.

The position includes administration and outreach to improve the Agriculture Department’s civil rights efforts and image nationwide.

The department official who confirmed the meeting asked not to be identified.

Sherrod was forced to resign in July after misleading and incomplete video footage of a speech she gave was posted on the internet and picked up in media reports. Vilsack apologized to her and offered her the promotion.

The flap began after conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart posted a portion of a speech Sherrod gave in which she spoke of not offering her full help to a white farmer. The original post by Breitbart indicated that the incident Sherrod mentioned occurred when she worked for the Agriculture Department, and news outlets quickly picked up on the story.

However, the incident took place decades before she joined the department, and her speech in its unedited form made the point that people should move beyond race. In addition, the white farmer who Sherrod mentioned has told reporters that she helped him save his farm.

Sherrod spoke about the incident Saturday at a meeting of the Federation of Southern Cooperatives Land Assistance Fund in Epes, Alabama.

She said her work with other agencies to help poor counties in south Georgia was overlooked during the controversy.

Sherrod said Saturday she has no criticism of President Obama and believes the NAACP, which also urged her to resign before learning the video had misconstrued her comments, was tricked.

NAACP President Ben Jealous spoke Saturday at the Alabama meeting.

Repeated calls to Sherrod were not returned Saturday.

Shirley Sherrod to meet with Vilsack about a job

Blagojevich deliberations will go into third week

(CNN) — If the Rod Blagojevich trial were a movie, it could be called Lost in Deliberation.

The fate of the former Illinois governor is in the hands of a jury that can’t seem to make up its mind.

Two weeks have gone by. And if the note the jury sent to the judge on Thursday is any indication, the deliberations are likely to drag into a third week.

But will this be a record for jury deliberations? Not by a long shot.

In 2004, a mother and son sued Long Beach, California, saying the city was violating federal law by not allowing them to open up residential homes for Alzheimer’s patients.

A jury took four months deciding the multimillion dollar case, which is believed to be a record for the mainland United States.

But that’s nothing compared to a case in Guam in 2001, where the jury spent a whopping 15 months to render a decision in a big-dollar civil case.

“We have the record even though there is no agency that tracks deliberation times,” said Dick Williams, the lead attorney in the Guam case. “In the legal lore, our case is thought of as the longest.”

The case involved a lawsuit against two construction firms after an earthquake toppled a resort hotel in Guam.

The first indication that the verdict would take a while came when the jury sent a note to the judge that had nothing to do with the evidence in the case.

“The first request from the jury on the first day of deliberations was for two refrigerators,” Williams said.

While they wait, lawyers and nervous clients can only look to questions and requests the jury makes to the judge for clues on when a verdict may come.

Other than that, what happens in the jury room is a secret.

In the Blagojevich federal corruption case, the former governor faces charges including racketeering, wire fraud, attempted extortion and bribery.

The two-term Democrat was removed from office in January 2009 amid accusations that he attempted to sell the U.S. Senate seat that had been occupied by Barack Obama before he became president.

On Thursday, the jury sent a note that suggested that it was far from reaching a decision.

The panel had only decided on two of the 24 counts against Blagojevich, the note said. It failed to agree on 11 counts and had yet to consider 11 others, involving wire fraud charges. They were implored to keep working.

A judge has a few tools to move a jury toward reaching a decision in a case.

He or she can step in and ask the jury if it is deadlocked and then declare a hung jury.

This leads to a mistrial and a possibility that a case would have to be re-tried.

This option does not seem likely in the Blagojevich case, some legal experts say.

“I think the judge will be patient in this case,” said Jessica Gabel, a law professor at Georgia State University.

“The larger issue is if there is a hung jury, this could be very costly in a time when prosecutors cannot afford it. The case would have to tried all over again and with the media and paparazzi and everything that goes along with this case, it could become very costly.”

One of Blagojevich’s lawyers has already told the Chicago Tribune that the wait is affecting him. He hasn’t been able to eat or sleep, according to the attorney.

Those who have been through longer waits have some advice.

“In my case, I just tried not to think about it,” said Barry Litt, who was an attorney in the Long Beach case.

“After it gets past five days, any trial lawyer will start to get anxious.”

In the Blagojevich case, Monday will be Day 13.

Blagojevich deliberations will go into third week

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?

Washington (CNN) — While he’s not on the ballot, George W. Bush is still vital to the midterm election as far as the nation’s top Democrat is concerned.

President Obama has made a point recently to invoke Bush’s name in what many say is a calculated effort to remind voters of the previous administration’s economic policies, which Democrats argue led to the worst recession in modern history.

On Monday, the president told those attending a Democratic fundraiser in Atlanta, Georgia, that the GOP has not distinguished itself from Bush.

“They have not come up with a single solitary, new idea to address the challenges of the American people,” Obama said. “They don’t have a single idea that’s different from George Bush’s ideas … not one.”

That sentiment was echoed once again on Wednesday during a speech before the AFL-CIO and at a fundraiser in Chicago, Illinois, a day later.

“They haven’t come out with a single solitary idea that is different from policies that held sway for eight years before Democrats took over,” Obama said Thursday. “Not a single policy difference that’s discernable from [George W.] Bush. Not one.”

Since taking office, Obama has largely referred to the “previous administration” or the “Republican control for the past eight years” in place of saying the name “Bush.”

So why the recent surge in Bush-bashing? It may have something to do with polls.

Video: Most negative campaign season ever?

Video: Obama: Job growth must increase

A Quinnipiac University poll, taken July 13-19, asked 2,181 registered voters: “Who do you blame more for the current condition of the U.S. economy: former President George W. Bush or President Barack Obama?”

Fifty-three percent said Bush; 25 percent said Obama; 21 percent said either neither, both or unsure.

Perhaps the most stark example of why Bush’s name is now a part of Obama’s stump speech comes from a poll by the Benenson Strategy Group, the president’s chief polling firm. The poll was taken for Third Way, a moderate think tank.

Conducted June 19-22 of 1,100 likely voters, the poll found that Bush’s economic principles are “almost universally rejected” by a large margin — and merely bringing up Bush’s name causes a swing in attitudes.

When respondents were asked whether they would prefer a candidate who “will stick with President Barack Obama’s economic policies” or “one who will return to President George W. Bush’s economic policies,” the result was a 15-point advantage for the Obama approach.

Read more of the poll results

“President Bush is the key here,” said Sean Gibbons of Third Way. “If you enter President Bush’s name into the equation and ask people when they’re making a choice at the polls between going forward with President Obama’s economic agenda or voting for a candidate who will pursue similar economic ideas as President Bush, Obama runs the table by 49 points. That is extraordinary.”

Conservatives fare better when one of the poll questions pitted generic conservative ideas on the economy to those of the Obama administration. It showed that a majority “actually favor conservative ideas,” Gibbons said, adding that “if you don’t use President Bush’s name, the whole thing flips.”

Republicans, meanwhile, discredit the notion that invoking Bush will change the outcome of the election.

“Democrats can keep talking about the [Bush administration], but they’ll do so in vain,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Doug Heye. “Voters are concerned with the here and now, which means a job market that has atrophied and foreclosures on the rise while the Democrats who control Washington pass a stimulus bill no one wanted.”

Oregon Republican Greg Walden, the deputy chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, has said that Democrats can “spin, they can sing, they can dance naked in the streets to say it’s about Bush, but he’s neither in the White House nor on the ballot.”

Texas GOP Rep. Pete Sessions, who chairs the campaign committee, told reporters in July that Republican candidates already “have their footing” in their races and noted that the former president has not participated in any political activities since he left office.

“He has not been involved. He does not do fundraisers. He’s said to us ‘I’m not interested in doing it’ and that’s goes back to the day he left,” Sessions added.

CNN’s Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?

Obama talks with USDA employee forced out of her job

(CNN) — Shirley Sherrod got her wish Thursday: a conversation with President Barack Obama about her forced resignation from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The president and Sherrod spoke by telephone after Obama apparently had some trouble getting through to her. Afterward, Sherrod told CNN that the call was “very, very good.”

Obama offered his support and said the two had faced similar issues in their pasts, Sherrod said.

However, she said they didn’t discuss whether the White House had a role in her ouster by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, which came after misleading and incomplete video footage of a speech she gave was posted on the internet and picked up in media reports.

“He didn’t go into that,” Sherrod said. “He wanted to reassure me that Secretary Vilsack was truly sincere … with his efforts to rid the agency of discrimination.”

Asked how it felt to talk to the president, Sherrod said: “Oh, gosh, you know, it was great.

“He’s the president of the United States of America. I respect him as that. I appreciate him as that,” Sherrod said. “And it felt like talking to someone else just sitting in the front of the car here.”

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama personally apologized to Sherrod in the phone call but did not lobby for her to take another job at the Department of Agriculture, as offered by Vilsack.

“This was not, ‘Hey, Shirley, take this job,’ ” Gibbs said at the White House. “That was not the specific purpose of the call.”

The president’s office sent Sherrod a text message indicating that Obama had been trying to get in touch with her, Sherrod told CNN producer Julie O’Neill.

Sherrod said she called the White House and was given another number to call. She dialed that number a few minutes later and spoke with the president.

According to O’Neill, Sherrod declined to have the phone call videotaped by CNN.

A White House statement said the two spoke for seven minutes.

“The president expressed to Ms. Sherrod his regret about the events of the last several days,” the statement said. “He emphasized that Secretary Vilsack was sincere in his apology yesterday, and in his work to rid USDA of discrimination.”

According to the statement, Obama also told Sherrod “that this misfortune can present an opportunity for her to continue her hard work on behalf of those in need, and he hopes that she will do so.”

The flap began after conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart last week posted a portion of a speech Sherrod gave in which she spoke of not offering her full help to a white farmer. The original post by Breitbart indicated that the incident Sherrod mentioned occurred when she worked for the Agriculture Department, and news outlets quickly picked up on the story.

However, the incident took place decades before she joined the department, and her speech in its unedited form made the point that people should move beyond race. In addition, the white farmer who Sherrod mentioned has told reporters that she helped him save his farm.

Sherrod was forced to resign Monday, but when the full story came out Tuesday, the White House pressured Vilsack to reconsider. Both Vilsack and Gibbs issued apologies to Sherrod on Wednesday, and Vilsack said he offered her another job in the Agriculture Department.

At the same time, White House aides said Wednesday on condition of not being identified by name that Obama was unlikely to call Sherrod or personally interject himself in the race-tinged controversy.

One aide said there wouldn’t be any more “beer summits,” a reference to the White House meeting Obama held last year amid the controversy over the arrest of Harvard law professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Gates, who is African-American, was arrested at his home by police Sgt. James Crowley, who is white, in what amounted to a misunderstanding. After Obama criticized the arrest, an ensuing uproar led to the White House discussion over beer involving Obama, Gates, Crowley and Vice President Joe Biden.

Until Thursday’s phone discussion between Sherrod and Obama, the White House had tried to separate the president from the issue by emphasizing that Obama played no role in the decision to force Sherrod to resign.

None of that mattered to Sherrod on Thursday. She said Obama was so easy to talk to that she invited him to visit south Georgia, where she is from. There was no word on whether the president would accept her invitation.

Obama talks with USDA employee forced out of her job

Georgia GOP governors race headed to runoff

Atlanta, Georgia (CNN) — Former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes is a step closer to his goal of winning back his old job.

Barnes Tuesday easily won the Democratic gubernatorial nomination. But Barneswill have to wait until next month to find out who his Republican opponent will be in November’s general election.

With 98 percent of precincts reporting, the Georgia Secretary of State’s web page indicated that Barnes had captured 65.8 percent of the primary vote, with state Attorney General Thurbert Baker at 21.7 percent. Five other Democratic gubernatorial candidates were in the single digits.

“Tonight is the beginning to take our state back from the lobbyists and the special interests,” Barnes told a crowd of supporters Tuesday night in Atlanta.

Barnes appeared to be looking to the general election even before Tuesday’s primary. Over the weekend he surprised some by saying he would sign an Arizona-style immigration bill if elected governor.

By grabbing more than 50 percent of the vote, Barnes avoids a runoff contest on August 10.

That isn’t the case with the competitive Republican gubernatorial battle.

With 98 percent of precincts reporting, former Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel led the GOP contest with 34.1 percent of the vote. Former Rep. Nathan Deal was in second, at 22.9 percent, followed by former state Sen. Eric Johnson at 20.1 and state Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine at 16.9 percent. Three other candidates were in single digits.

Handel and Deal now advance to the runoff election.

Last week, former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin backed Handel for governor. Public opinion surveys indicated that the endorsement helped propel Handel into the front-runner position. Until the endorsement, surveys stretching back to last year indicated that Oxendine was the candidate to beat.

On her Facebook page, Palin called Handel a reformer who will “strengthen … families, businesses, state and, ultimately, our United States.” Handel also went up with a campaign commercial that mentioned that she’s the only female candidate in the contest.

The Republican race turned bitter following Palin’s endorsement, with a tough new ad from the Oxendine campaign taking on Handel, and the Handel and Deal campaigns accusing each other of playing the gender card.

Oxendine was the subject of unflattering investigative pieces about a possible corruption probe in the 1990s. Oxendine was never charged with wrongdoing, and he has insisted that he did not know he was ever investigated, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. And the Handel-Deal war of words has raised their profiles.

Deal was the subject of a congressional ethics probe before stepping down from his House seat in March to pursue a gubernatorial run. He has denied wrongdoing.

Deal grabbed his own major endorsement, winning the backing of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

“It’s been clear for a while that this would be a race to the runoff, and it looks like Palin’s endorsement has helped Handel, not only get to the runoff but potentially finish first on Tuesday,” said Nathan Gonzales, political editor of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report. “Palin has a following within the Republican Party, and in a multi-candidate contest, she can have impact.”

In May, Palin endorsed little-known South Carolina state lawmaker Nikki Haley in that state’s GOP gubernatorial nomination battle. Palin’s backing helped Haley jump from the bottom of the pack to front-runner, according to state polls. Haley ended up coming out on top in South Carolina’s June 8 primary, capturing nearly 50 percent of the vote in a four-candidate field. Two weeks later, Haley easily won the runoff election to take the nomination.

CNN’s Steve Brusk contributed to this report.

Georgia GOP governors race headed to runoff

Heat wave: Triple-digit temperatures push East Coast to pools, malls

By

Mark Trumbull,