Tag Archives: election

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?

Washington (CNN) — While he’s not on the ballot, George W. Bush is still vital to the midterm election as far as the nation’s top Democrat is concerned.

President Obama has made a point recently to invoke Bush’s name in what many say is a calculated effort to remind voters of the previous administration’s economic policies, which Democrats argue led to the worst recession in modern history.

On Monday, the president told those attending a Democratic fundraiser in Atlanta, Georgia, that the GOP has not distinguished itself from Bush.

“They have not come up with a single solitary, new idea to address the challenges of the American people,” Obama said. “They don’t have a single idea that’s different from George Bush’s ideas … not one.”

That sentiment was echoed once again on Wednesday during a speech before the AFL-CIO and at a fundraiser in Chicago, Illinois, a day later.

“They haven’t come out with a single solitary idea that is different from policies that held sway for eight years before Democrats took over,” Obama said Thursday. “Not a single policy difference that’s discernable from [George W.] Bush. Not one.”

Since taking office, Obama has largely referred to the “previous administration” or the “Republican control for the past eight years” in place of saying the name “Bush.”

So why the recent surge in Bush-bashing? It may have something to do with polls.

Video: Most negative campaign season ever?

Video: Obama: Job growth must increase

A Quinnipiac University poll, taken July 13-19, asked 2,181 registered voters: “Who do you blame more for the current condition of the U.S. economy: former President George W. Bush or President Barack Obama?”

Fifty-three percent said Bush; 25 percent said Obama; 21 percent said either neither, both or unsure.

Perhaps the most stark example of why Bush’s name is now a part of Obama’s stump speech comes from a poll by the Benenson Strategy Group, the president’s chief polling firm. The poll was taken for Third Way, a moderate think tank.

Conducted June 19-22 of 1,100 likely voters, the poll found that Bush’s economic principles are “almost universally rejected” by a large margin — and merely bringing up Bush’s name causes a swing in attitudes.

When respondents were asked whether they would prefer a candidate who “will stick with President Barack Obama’s economic policies” or “one who will return to President George W. Bush’s economic policies,” the result was a 15-point advantage for the Obama approach.

Read more of the poll results

“President Bush is the key here,” said Sean Gibbons of Third Way. “If you enter President Bush’s name into the equation and ask people when they’re making a choice at the polls between going forward with President Obama’s economic agenda or voting for a candidate who will pursue similar economic ideas as President Bush, Obama runs the table by 49 points. That is extraordinary.”

Conservatives fare better when one of the poll questions pitted generic conservative ideas on the economy to those of the Obama administration. It showed that a majority “actually favor conservative ideas,” Gibbons said, adding that “if you don’t use President Bush’s name, the whole thing flips.”

Republicans, meanwhile, discredit the notion that invoking Bush will change the outcome of the election.

“Democrats can keep talking about the [Bush administration], but they’ll do so in vain,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Doug Heye. “Voters are concerned with the here and now, which means a job market that has atrophied and foreclosures on the rise while the Democrats who control Washington pass a stimulus bill no one wanted.”

Oregon Republican Greg Walden, the deputy chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, has said that Democrats can “spin, they can sing, they can dance naked in the streets to say it’s about Bush, but he’s neither in the White House nor on the ballot.”

Texas GOP Rep. Pete Sessions, who chairs the campaign committee, told reporters in July that Republican candidates already “have their footing” in their races and noted that the former president has not participated in any political activities since he left office.

“He has not been involved. He does not do fundraisers. He’s said to us ‘I’m not interested in doing it’ and that’s goes back to the day he left,” Sessions added.

CNN’s Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.

Can Bush-bashing help sway voters?

November election campaign in full swing

Washington (CNN) — If anyone doubted whether campaigning had started for the mid-term congressional elections in November, the answer became clear on Sunday.

Democratic and Republican politicians rolled out their main campaign themes on morning talk shows less than four months before voters will decide races for all 435 House seats and at least 36 of the 100 Senate posts.

West Virginia could decide to hold a special election in November to fill the seat of the late Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd, which would put 37 Senate seats in play.

To Republicans, the election is about halting the free-spending policies of a Democratic-controlled White House and Congress. For Democrats, the choice for voters is between moving forward to tackle tough issues or going back to failed GOP policies of the past.

While Democrats repeatedly invoke the crippling recession and increased deficits of the Bush administration, Republicans say the problem now is how the majority party forces through unpopular and irresponsibly expensive legislation.

“How long can the other side run against the previous administration?” asked Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, on the CNN program “State of the Union.” “They’ve been in charge now for a year and a half. They’ve been on a gargantuan spending spree.”

On the same show, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, shot back that the nation needs to progress rather than boomerang.

“What we’re going to focus on is not returning to the failed Bush policies that brought us to this point, but focus on the efforts that we have made which are making progress,” Hoyer said. “We haven’t succeeded yet, but we are making substantial progress. The economy is growing. We are creating jobs.”

Video: Hoyer talks about high anxiety of U.S.

Video: McConnell explains his ‘groove’ comment

Democrats conceded that the slow economic recovery, with unemployment still above 9 percent, continues to rankle voters upset with the entire Washington establishment. However, both Hoyer and Vice President Joe Biden took aim at GOP calls to repeal major reform bills of the past year — the health insurance overhaul and increased Wall Street regulations — and replace them with less comprehensive proposals.

“Very frankly, we think that when Americans assess, ‘Do we want to go back; do we want to, in fact, repeal the successes we’ve had and repeat the mistakes that we’ve made that got us to this point,’ I think they’re going to say, no, they don’t want to go back to the Bush policies,” Hoyer said.

Appearing on the ABC program “This Week,” Biden complained of Republican efforts to obstruct any progress under President Barack Obama.

“There is the reality of whether or not the Republicans are willing to play, whether or not the Republicans are just about repeal and repeat the old policies or they’re really wanting to do something,” Biden said.

McConnell and other Republicans made no apologies.

“What we are proud to say ‘no’ to, and I think what the public wants us to say ‘no’ to, are things like the government running banks, insurance companies, car companies, nationalizing the student loan business, taking over our health care,” he said.

His GOP ally in the House, Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana, told “Fox News Sunday” that people don’t want all the costly reform legislation pushed by Democrats.

“All we’re getting from the Democratic majority in Congress and from this White House is more bailouts, more spending, more planned stimulus, more deficits and debt, and the American people have had it,” Pence said.

On the NBC program “Meet the Press,” Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas blamed the nation’s economic woes dating to the previous administration on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, who became the nation’s first woman House Speaker in 2006.

“It is because Speaker Pelosi has been in charge for four years and denied (former President George W. Bush) the ability to continue doing what was successful in this country, and that is making the free enterprise system not only more powerful but competitive with the world,” Sessions said, later adding: “Today it’s about empowering government, and that is a mistake.”

Democrats, however, said Republicans are simply opposing whatever Obama and their party’s congressional leaders propose without offering any substantive alternatives. With primaries for November determining specific candidates, they say, the stark differences offered voters will become more apparent.

“The most vulnerable time any public official finds himself is in when they have no opponent,” Biden said, noting how Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, was thought to be in trouble until the Republican primary chose extreme conservative Sharron Angle to face him. Reid now holds a lead in the latest polling.

“I know my Republican colleagues would like to have everybody forget that their candidates are on the ballot, but their candidates will be on the ballot,” Sen. Robert Menendez, D-New Jersey, said on the NBC program. “And it’s not just talking about President Bush; it’s the policies that they espouse that are in essence Bush’s policies.

On the same show, Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said Republicans “want to get away, essentially, with carping and whining about everything here without telling the American people what they will do.”

He singled out the House Republican leader, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, as an example of what the opposition seeks to do.

Boehner “just this week said that he’s going to move to repeal the Wall Street reform bill,” Van Hollen said. “Now, Wall Street lobbyists have been working very hard to try and defeat that Wall Street reform bill. “And what he is saying is, ‘Just wait. If I have the opportunity, I’m going to take care of it for you.’ So it’s that kind of thing that’s going to make it clear to the American people what kind of choice they have.”

However, GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, also on the NBC program, said the public wants “checks and balances” in Washington.

“They’ve had single-party government, and it’s scaring the living daylights out of them,” Cornyn said, citing the health care reform bill as example. Asked what would happen with Republicans back in power, Cornyn said: “I think repeal and replace it with a common-sense solution.”

November election campaign in full swing

Some Dems still fuming over Gibbs’ comments

Washington (CNN) — House Democratic leaders met with President Barack Obama on Wednesday night to discuss legislative priorities in the run-up to the November mid-term election, but one topic was bypassed — the weekend assessment by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs that Republicans could win back the chamber.

Aides to the House Democratic leaders told CNN that the meeting with Obama was productive and focused mostly on economic issues and policy. One leadership aide said Obama declared the Democrats would retain control of the House in November, but there was no mention in the meeting of the remark by Gibbs.

Earlier, senior Democratic officials said that at a private Capitol Hill meeting on Tuesday night, a string of House Democrats — including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — expressed deep frustration that Gibbs had played into Republicans’ hands by answering a hypothetical question on NBC’s “Meet the Press” about whether Democrats may lose their grip on power.

In a statement that senior White House officials maintain was blindingly obvious and really not newsworthy, Gibbs said on Sunday, “I think there is no doubt there are enough seats in play — that could cause Republicans to gain control.”

The senior Democratic officials said it’s one thing for a pundit to state the obvious about the state of play in the election and quite another for a top White House official to offer an assessment that may depress the party’s base just as officials hope to start revving liberals up.

“Members were hot — hot, hot, hot,” one senior Democratic official told CNN about the private meeting Tuesday where House Democrats directed their anger at Dan Turton, a White House aide who attended the session.

A senior administration official acknowledged to CNN there was heavy tension at Tuesday’s congressional meeting, but stressed that many lawmakers also said that after expressing their frustration they now want to turn the page and did not plan to rail against the president himself at Wednesday night’s meeting at the White House with Pelosi and other leaders including Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Majority Whip Jim Clyburn of South Carolina.

Several House Democrats offered a similar message.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman, took a jab at Gibbs on Wednesday when he told reporters that “people need to be aware of how their comments will be interpreted in a political environment.”

Later, in an interview with CNN, Van Hollen stressed the need to move past the comments by Gibbs.

“There is no upside to this and we need to get beyond this and focus less on what the president’s spokesman said on a news show and focus on what the Republicans say they will do if they get control of the House,” said Van Hollen, of Maryland. Republicans are asking voters “to send back the same guys who got the economy in the ditch to begin with,” he said.

Hoyer said Democrats need to get on the same page when they meet with Obama.

“I think our message to the president is we need to be speaking obviously on message from the White House, and from the House, and I think we need to be focused on what we’ve done to create jobs and move the country forward,” Hoyer said, repeating his comment Tuesday that “we’re going to maintain control of the House so I think any conclusion other than that is incorrect.”

Meanwhile, House Republican Leader John Boehner described the chamber’s Democratic caucus as “in chaos,” but acknowledged Republicans have “a steep hill to climb to get to the majority.”

“We’ve got a lot of work to do, but it is possible,” said Boehner, of Ohio.

Dina Titus, a first term Democrat from Nevada and a top target of Republicans, told CNN she hoped the party spat would “get Democrats all enthused and they turn out even more because these are tough races.”

But she also sought to distance herself from the White House and top Democrats, saying: “We’re just running our own race. I’m not Obama. I’m not Reid. I’m Dina Titus and that’s what we’re focusing on.”

Gibbs, on Wednesday at his White House briefing, sought to ease some of the tension by saying Pelosi’s efforts have been “monumental” on behalf of the president’s agenda. He also reiterated that his original comments on Sunday were meant to rally the party into coming together on showing voters there will be a sharp contrast between the Republican and Democratic agendas in November.

“On that choice we will do very well,” said Gibbs, adding that he believes Democrats will keep control of both the House and Senate.

Nevertheless, Gibbs’ comments sent alarm bells through the upper echelons of the Democratic party, especially because Van Hollen’s Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has a long-planned breakfast meeting Thursday with lobbyists who are key party fundraisers.

The committee, which is in charge of helping to elect House Democrats, had been hoping to project momentum in advance of Friday’s deadline to publicly reveal fundraising numbers for the first six months of this year.

The fear now among some top Democrats, in the words of one top party official, is that the Gibbs comments will “give the Republicans a big fundraising boost” as perception builds that Democrats are in even deeper trouble than already expected.

Gibbs himself has insisted all week that he was really just stating the obvious about the challenge Democrats are facing.

“I think I did what is maybe uncommon in this town and yesterday I opened my mouth and stated the obvious,” Gibbs said at Monday’s daily press briefing with reporters. “I do not believe that you all are now scurrying around to cover this election markedly different based on my having said that there are a number of seats that are in play.”

Gibbs has also stressed all week that he’s merely trying to focus everyone on the fact that both parties will be offering sharply different visions of how to deal with key issues like the economy.

“You’re going to have a choice between the leadership that we have now and the leadership that believes that BP should be apologized to first and foremost, and that the type of calamity wrought by the financial meltdown in the end of 2008 is analogous to the size of an ant,” Gibbs said Monday. “Those are choices that the American people are going to get a chance to hear and make in November.”

CNN’s Deirdre Walsh and Brianna Keilar contributed to this report.

Some Dems still fuming over Gibbs’ comments

Is Harry Reid’s name poisoning son’s campaign?

Washington (CNN) — As President Obama campaigned for Rory Reid’s famous and powerful father in Nevada, the son was hundreds of miles away campaigning for governor.

While there’s no animosity between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his son, the younger Reid’s use of his first name on his campaign’s website and television ads is telling, a veteran political observer in Nevada said.

“Obviously he’s trying to downplay his last name,” said Jon Ralston, a columnist for the Las Vegas Sun and publisher of the Ralston Report. “In so obviously downplaying it, he’s called even more attention to it.”

The reason, he said: Poll numbers showing high unfavorable ratings for both Reids.

In a Las Vegas Review-Journal poll from June, 52 percent had an unfavorable view of Harry Reid. Polls also indicate Rory Reid trails his Republican gubernatorial opponent, Brian Sandoval, by double digits.

“The reason he’s [Rory] losing so badly is because his identity is inextricably linked to his father,” he said. “So his father’s negatives are attaching to him.”

Other political families on the ballot

Video: Obama stumps for Sen. Reid

RELATED TOPICS

Ralston also suspects that a majority of Nevadans simply do not want two Reids on the ballot.

“What Harry Reid is doing in his campaign is going to end up hurting Rory Reid. Even if he can convince people to hold their noses and vote for him, they’re not going to vote for two Reids. They might vote for Harry Reid … they’ll say ‘one Reid is my limit.’ “

Harry Reid has come to his son’s defense, saying in an interview with the Review-Journal that while he “cares a great deal about him … he has to run on his own.”

For his part, Rory Reid told Fox’s Las Vegas affiliate that he thinks “people know who I am and I like the way my first name sounds.”

And it’s evident. His campaign website’s top banner reads, “Rory2010″ — and on the “Meet Rory” biography section, there is no mention of his last name. His first television ad drew criticism because his last name was not mentioned. A recent ad, however, briefly used his last name.

“The story surrounding his first ad was how he didn’t mention his last name,” Ralston said. “They thought by putting his last name once in another ad, it wouldn’t be talked about as much … It’s become such an issue now that it’s very difficult for him to get away from it.”

And it didn’t take long for Republicans to jump on that. In an ad by the Republican Governors Association, two people appearing to be aides walk up to Rory Reid’s dressing room. A gold star on the door reads “Rory,” with his last name blacked out.

See more on the RGA’s ad

Political blogs and some residents are also poking fun at the name controversy.

The blog Wonkette, in a post titled “Rory Reid No Longer Related to Harry Reid,” reads: “It’s also funny how the Rory 2010 website refers to all other human beings with their last names, yet not him. Is Rory Reid better than other humans?”

In the letter to the editor section of the Review-Journal, Daniel Maxime of Las Vegas, wrote: “Elvis! Liza! Engelbert! Cher! Madonna! Rory! … When did Clark County Commissioner and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Rory Reid become a one-name star? Of course, if my last name were Reid, I surely would be running from it this election year.”

Ralston said Rory Reid’s campaign is overthinking the name issue.

“Everything he does is Rory this, Rory that. How often do you see that in a campaign where someone’s just using their first name?” he said. “It just doesn’t happen.”

So what can the gubernatorial candidate do to turn around his poll numbers?

“He should take a page out of his dad’s book: His dad realizes the only way for him to win is to raise his opponent’s negatives,” Ralston said. “That’s the only way that Rory Reid has a chance.”

Dan Hart, a political consultant who appeared on Ralston’s “Face to Face” television show, said give him time.

“He has to tell people about himself, what he’s accomplished, what his goals for the state are,” Hart said. “He will, and it will take a bit of time.”

Is Harry Reid’s name poisoning son’s campaign?

Ron Paul ponders politics, 2012 run

Des Moines, Iowa (CNN) — When Rep. Ron Paul walked into Hy-Vee Hall last month, a single blue sign with a simple message was placed near the escalator that took him upstairs to a fundraiser attended by 300 Republican activists.

It read: “President Ron Paul 2012.”

The sign was symbolic in many ways: Even as Iowa Republicans are focused on midterm elections, the 2012 presidential contest is not far from their minds. And it was just three years ago that Paul did not receive an invitation to participate in a presidential candidate forum held in this very building.

The sight of the Texas congressman riding the escalator up to address this group of influential Republicans was illustrative of how he has risen from a little-known congressman and afterthought presidential candidate to the national spokesman on libertarian philosophy.

All of this comes from a man who has no illusions that he can win his party’s presidential nomination, but that won’t stop him from running again in 2012 if he decides to do so.

“It is probably hard to believe, but I look at it a little bit differently than others,” Paul said in an interview during his recent visit to Iowa. “I don’t expect to be president. I don’t expect to be. That doesn’t mean I won’t run for president, but I am really energized when I think we make inroads … to broaden the outreach on the philosophy I have been talking about for 40 years.”

Video: Rep. Paul talks about GOP rifts

His advocacy of limited government, disdain for the Federal Reserve and belief that the U.S. should withdraw its troops from Afghanistan has attracted an eclectic following of young people, anti-war activists and those wary of government intrusion.

Paul began his 2008 White House run as a third-tier candidate, a gadfly with little support and even less money. Paul was never considered a serious frontrunner for the GOP nomination, but an explosion of support in the fall of 2007, fueled by online contributions, carried him into Iowa. There, he received 10 percent of the vote in the caucuses. He officially ended his presidential campaign in June 2008, well after Sen. John McCain had received enough support to win the Republican nomination.

“I don’t ever take personal credit as much as being in the right place at the right time and maybe saying the right things,” Paul said. “I have said the same things for 30 years when it came to financial bubbles. See, the business cycle theory is what motivated me to get into politics.”

On this night in Des Moines, Paul stuck to his talking points. He never mentioned a possible presidential run in 2012. Instead, Paul spoke of limited government and the need for government officials to follow the Constitution, which just so happened to be the theme of the Iowa GOP’s fundraiser. Paul’s address was bookended by standing ovations.

“I have been excited about and what he is talking about,” John Bowery, a Republican from Shenandoah, Iowa, said after Paul’s speech. “I am sorry he didn’t get more attention in 2008. I don’t know if he is going to run in 2012. If someone like him does, I will be all for it.”

Paul is an enigma in the Republican Party. He champions less government and a socially conservative philosophy, which would seem to play well with GOP base voters such as Bowery.

Yet Paul, who was the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee in 1988, doesn’t embrace the Republican brand. Party leaders and the GOP establishment types are not so smitten with him either. This is problematic in a presidential run, where well-oiled political machines are needed in key states to help build support and get-out-the-vote efforts in primaries and caucuses.

He does credit the Republican Party for sharpening its focus on the economy, but he doesn’t speak in terms of “we” but rather “they.”

“I think that the Republicans have, whether it is out of merit or accidental, they are in a good position right now mainly because they have talked about economics,” Paul said. “And their talk is good about watching the spending and watching the deficits and people are concerned about runaway government.”

I haven’t ruled it out, but I have no plans to do it.
–Ron Paul, on 2012 run

But Paul does express some skepticism that GOP promises of reforming Washington and cutting government might just be talk.

“I think they have the subject right, and they talk about it,” he said. “I think where they are going to come up short maybe not before the election, but afterwards.

“Where are they going to cut? Do they have a plan to cut? It is easy to vote against the spending when you are in opposition. But where are they going to cut? And I think that is what I have talked about … especially these past four years. And that is where we challenged the Republicans.”

Last month’s trip to Iowa was his third to the state since November 2009, so it begs the question: Is Paul trying to lay the groundwork for a 2012 White House run?

“I am very serious about thinking about it all the time,” Paul said about his possible presidential aspirations. “My answer is always the same thing: You know I haven’t ruled it out, but I have no plans to do it.”

For now, Paul will continue to travel the country to promote his philosophy, while his 2008 presidential campaign operation has morphed into the Campaign for Liberty, a 500,000-member organization that promotes libertarian views.

Paul also has a small political action committee that doles out contributions to “liberty-based candidates,” a spokesman said.

Ron Paul ponders politics, 2012 run

Obama calls for immigration reform

Washington (CNN) — President Obama renewed his push for comprehensive immigration reform Thursday, calling for bipartisan cooperation on an issue that has repeatedly led to deep social and political division.

The president tried to find what has often proven to be an elusive middle ground on the subject, highlighting the importance of immigrants to American history and progress while also acknowledging the fear and frustration many people now feel with a system that he said seems “fundamentally broken.”

He asserted the majority of Americans are ready to embrace reform legislation that would help resolve the status of an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.

“I believe we can put politics aside and finally have an immigration system that’s accountable,” Obama told an audience at Washington’s American University. “I believe we can appeal not to people’s fears, but to their hopes, to their highest ideals. Because that’s who we are as Americans.”

The president targeted Arizona’s controversial new immigration law, which requires immigrants to carry alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question people if there’s reason to suspect they’re in the United States illegally. It also targets businesses that hire illegal immigrant laborers or knowingly transport them.

Video: White House: Republicans needed

Video: Marine’s mom fears deportation

Video: Obama pushes on immigration issue

The measure — under review by the Justice Department — has “fanned the flames of an already contentious debate,” Obama said. It puts pressure on police officers to enforce rules that are “unenforceable” while making communities less safe — in part, by making people more reluctant to report crimes. It also has “the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject to possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound.”

Rounding up everyone in the country who has entered illegally would be both “logistically impossible” and “tear at the fabric of the nation,” the president warned.

But at the same time, Obama suggested, it would be wrong to offer blanket amnesty for people who came into the United States unlawfully.

To do so “would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. … It would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally.”

Ultimately, he said, “our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship. And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable.”

Obama said those who entered the country illegally must admit they broke the law, register with the appropriate authorities, pay taxes, pay a fine and learn English. They must “get right with the law before they can get in line and earn their citizenship.”

The president urged Congress to tackle immigration reform legislation but stressed that it would require support from both Democrats and Republicans.

“That is the political and mathematical reality,” he said.

Obama’s remarks, however, immediately received a cold reception from one top Senate Republican.

Obama and congressional Democrats “made a strategic decision to put immigration on the back burner, and they now claim they can’t even propose immigration legislation without a Republican,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. “It’s time for the president and congressional Democrats to stop the charade. Op-eds, outlines and speeches won’t cut it anymore.”

In turn, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, lashed out at the GOP, arguing that “instead of matching the leadership of Democrats to solve this problem and engaging in good-faith negotiations, Republicans continue to engage in political grandstanding and polarizing rhetoric that encourages intolerance of our vibrant immigration population.”

Reid, who is facing a tough re-election fight this year, is counting on a strong turnout among Latino voters in November.

Despite Obama’s call for bipartisan immigration reform, several senior Democratic sources said Thursday that they see virtually no chance of Congress taking up such a measure before November’s midterm elections.

Though some hold out hope for potential movement during a lame-duck session of Congress after the election, most sources said next year is the more realistic earliest target. But even that, according to one source, may be “happy talk.”

Still, these sources said that, politically, it was crucial for the president to give a speech like he did Thursday to put pressure on Republicans and, more importantly, to reassure angry Latino voters that Democrats haven’t forgotten about the issue.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. national poll conducted in late May indicated that public support for beefing up security along the U.S. border with Mexico had grown significantly. According to the survey, nearly nine out of 10 Americans want to beef up U.S. law enforcement along the border with Mexico.

Eight in 10 questioned also supported a program that would allow illegal immigrants already in the United States to stay here and apply for legal residency if they had a job and paid back taxes. Thirty-eight percent said that program should be a higher priority than border security and other get-tough proposals. Six in 10 said border security was the higher priority.

The president’s speech followed a highly anticipated meeting this week in which he discussed immigration reform with grass-roots reform advocates.

“From our meeting, it is clear that the president is committed to comprehensive immigration reform and understands that congressional action is needed urgently,” said Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum and a meeting attendee.

Other topics discussed at the meeting included concerns that grass-roots leaders had about reforms to current detention and deportation procedures, Noorani said.

CNN’s Dana Bash contributed to this report.

Obama calls for immigration reform

Did Democrats’ deal with the NRA kill campaign finance reform?

By

Gail Russell Chaddock,