Tag Archives: democratic

Axelrod hopes GOP gains bring cooperation

Washington (CNN) — White House senior adviser David Axelrod is looking for a silver lining in expected Democratic losses in November’s congressional elections.

While saying he thought his party would retain its majority in both the House and Senate in the November 2 voting, Axelrod told the CBS program “Face The Nation” that that he hoped Republican gains would bring more cooperation.

He accused Republicans of deliberate obstruction as a political strategy since President Barack Obama took office last year with majorities in both the House and Senate.

“The posture of the Republican Party from the moment we got here has been basically to deprive the president of bipartisan support so they could accuse him of not being bipartisan,” Axelrod said.

“So I’m hoping that with more seats, the Republicans will feel a greater sense of responsibility to work with us to solve some of these problems,” he said.

Former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie indicated a continued GOP hard-line stance on spending issues.

“I think there will be areas where there’s cooperation and areas where there’s opposition,” Gillespie said on the same program. “Look, the Republicans, if they take control of the House and get very close in the Senate, are going to try to put the brakes on all this reckless spending.”

Gillespie said “common ground” was possible on a few issues such as free trade agreements, but maintained his focus on spending controls.

“If they can find some areas where you can get spending restraint with this administration, Republicans would be happy to go along with that,” he said.

Axelrod hopes GOP gains bring cooperation

Quick shots: GOP extremes and Dems’ burden

(CNN)Editor’s note: There are 25 days to go before voters cast ballots in the hotly contested midterm elections. In this special feature, CNN’s political contributors share their quick thoughts on what’s making news.

John Avlon is a CNN contributor and senior political columnist for The Daily Beast. He is the author of “Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America.”

David Gergen is a senor political analyst for CNN and has been an adviser to four U.S. presidents. He is a professor of public service and director of the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School.

Avlon: A campaign of false choices

tzleft.avlon_john.jpg

The “silly season” feels more like an insane season this year.

I’m not talking about Christine O’Donnell’s surreal “I’m not a Witch” ad (though I couldn’t resist mentioning it). I’m talking about the politics of incitement — the fear-mongering and false choices that too often dominate our political debates.

Case in point came this week from two prospective 2012 GOP presidential nominees who have been hitting the campaign trail hard for candidates this year. Newt Gingrich pronounced 2010 a choice between food stamps and paychecks, not Democrats and Republicans. Sarah Palin went the existential route, calling it a choice between “a culture of death” and “culture of life.”

It’s a measure of our political culture: running for president used to inspire a person to be more responsible; now irresponsibility is seen as a strategic asset when it comes to playing to the base.

In this year’s candidate ads, we’ve seen Florida Democrat Alan Grayson describe his opponent as “Taliban Dan” (during wartime), and now GOP Senate nominee Sharron Angle of Nevada has an ad portraying Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid as scheming to spend taxpayer dollars to buy Viagara for child molesters and sex offenders.

It’s not just ugly; it’s stupid. It plays to the worst instincts of the American people. It’s evidence of politicians following the talk-radio model, where there is no such thing as too extreme. (And in a sign of things to come, Rush Limbaugh’s new name for President Obama is “imam child.”) No wonder 130 former lawmakers signed a letter warning that politicians “who far exceed the bounds of normal and respectful discourse are not viewed with shame but are lionized. … Meanwhile, lawmakers who try to address problems and find workable solutions across party lines find themselves denigrated by an angry fringe of partisans.”

This is the state of politics in 2010 — hate and fear used to pump up hyper-partisanship. Unless we confront this culture, it will make governing the country and solving common problems even tougher after the election.

Gergen: Jobs report a heavy burden for Democrats

tzleft.gergen.david.cnn.jpg

Friday’s unemployment report — the last before November’s election — delivers a harsh verdict for Democrats.

Barack Obama now heads into the midterm elections with the highest average unemployment record of any president since records were first kept some 60 years ago. For presidents from Eisenhower to Bush, unemployment has averaged in the mid-5 percent range; under Obama, the average is 9.4 percent.

The current situation also breaks the record for the longest period of elevated unemployment: stuck at 9.5 percent or higher for 14 straight months.

Democrats can argue they inherited an economic calamity — and they are absolutely right — but they have precious little to show for their flood of new spending, and they seem to have run out of ideas on how to fix things. It’s hard to imagine a heavier burden for Democratic candidates to carry into November.

The opinions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of the authors.

Quick shots: GOP extremes and Dems’ burden

Texas Dem fights for survival in GOP hotbed

Waco, Texas (CNN) — The volunteers file into the steamy campaign headquarters wearing bright red Chet Edwards T-shirts. A group of old men pull their “Vets for Chet” hats down tight, waiting for the congressman to fire up the troops.

“I think they might have predicted our demise a little too soon,” an energetic Chet Edwards tells the crowd to a round of cheers.

A young volunteer turns to a friend and says he’s eager to help the long-term Democratic congressman because, “he needs all the help he can get.”

The dozens of supporters standing in the room know Rep. Chet Edwards is in the toughest fight of his political life.

Edwards has long defied the political odds in Texas — a Democrat repeatedly elected to Congress since 1990 in one of the most conservative districts in the country.

The district includes Waco and Bryan-College Station, home to Baylor and Texas A&M universities, both bastions of conservatism.

In 2004, John Kerry received 30 percent of the vote in Edwards’ congressional district. In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama managed 32 percent. Each time, Chet Edwards was elected back to Congress.

Edwards is often called an “endangered species,” as many conservative Democrats have disappeared from the political landscape of Texas in the last 20 years.

His political survival skills even catapulted him to the shortlist of potential vice presidential nominees for President Obama in 2008.

Now, Edwards’ opponent doesn’t miss an opportunity to link Edwards to the unpopular president and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The Republican challenger, Bill Flores, paints Edwards as part of the Washington establishment.

“Since Nancy Pelosi took over, Edwards votes with her 96 percent of the time,” said one Flores campaign advertisement.

Edwards said he feels comfortable as an underdog. “I think voters have known me for years and they’ve known I’ve always been independent.”

Edwards sounds like a Republican in his campaign commercials, criticizing Democrats for passing health care reform and for being too liberal.

“I think Democrats in Washington have tried to do too much,” he said. “I wish some of them had focused more on our economy.”

Edwards bills himself as an independent voice in tune with the conservative side of his constituents. It won him the endorsements of the National Rifle Association, the Texas Farm Bureau and many military veterans groups.

But the intense anti-incumbent, anti-Washington mood is blowing swiftly across the rural Texas prairie that makes up much of Edwards’ congressional district.

The lunchtime crowd at the Bunkhouse BBQ joint in Clifton, Texas, symbolizes the struggles Edwards is facing this election year.

Burl and Dianne Hammons describe themselves as independent conservatives who’ve supported Chet Edwards in the past.

They have a son in the military and the congressman’s support of military issues often won them over. But this year, the Hammons are voting for Republican Bill Flores, even though they admit they don’t know much about him.

“He’s [Edwards] done a lot of good, but he’s through. He’s finished. He’s moving into the Pelosi area. … That doesn’t get my vote,” Burl Hammons said.

The last month of the campaign promises to be intense. The Edwards campaign accused Flores of supporting plans to privatize veterans health care and Social Security.

Flores said that’s not true but said he does support giving veterans the choice to use private doctors at government cost if they don’t want to travel to a VA hospital.

According to Flores, those attacks show Edwards is in more trouble than he’s ever been before and the Flores campaign said this is the first time the “right kind” of Republican opponent has matched up against Edwards.

Flores grew up in the Texas Panhandle, graduated from Texas A&M and spent 30 years working in the energy industry. This is his first run for public office.

Flores’ attempts to paint Edwards as a Washington liberal appears to be working.

Back at the Bunkhouse BBQ joint, Kim Watkins remembers all the votes she cast for Edwards, but said the congressman has swung to the left.

“He’s a hometown boy — he’s been around a long time, but I think the Democratic roots are showing up a little more,” said Watkins.

The Edwards campaign said it’s starting to cut into Flores’ lead. According to the campaign’s internal polling, Flores had a 10-point lead in mid-September. Their poll this week says the congressman has cut the lead to four points.

But the Flores campaign fired back with its own internal polling taken September 23 that shows Flores with a 19-point lead.

Edwards is used to this story. He often jokes that his Republican opponents start measuring the drapes too soon.

“They’ve written my obituary in so many elections over the years,” he said.

Texas Dem fights for survival in GOP hotbed

Subpoenas issued in John Edwards’ probe

(CNN) — A “sizable” number of subpoenas have been issued in the investigation of former Sen. John Edwards, his attorney said.

Wade Smith, the attorney, said Wednesday he did not know who asked for the subpoenas or who was summoned. However, Smith said he maintained Edwards is innocent and said they welcome the government scrutiny.

A North Carolina federal grand jury has been investigating payments the former senator’s campaign and supporters made to Rielle Hunter, his mistress who also worked as a videographer for his campaign.

As Edwards campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, allegations began to surface that he had an affair with Hunter as well as he was the father of Hunter’s young child.

Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, became legally separated after the scandal.

Subpoenas issued in John Edwards’ probe

White House denies Obama-Clinton ticket in the works

Washington (CNN) — White House spokesman Robert Gibbs is pouring cold water on the red-hot speculation — fueled by journalist Bob Woodward in a CNN interview — that President Barack Obama may create a so-called “dream ticket” of Obama-Clinton in his 2012 re-election battle.

“No one in the White House is discussing this as a possibility,” Gibbs told CNN Wednesday morning.

The speculation that Obama may dump Vice President Joe Biden as his running mate and shift him over to the secretary of state job — moving current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the VP slot — was sparked by Woodward in an interview Tuesday night with CNN’s Chief National Correspondent John King.

“It’s on the table,” Woodward said on “John King, USA.” “Some of Hillary Clinton’s advisers see it as a real possibility in 2012.”

Obama advisers outside the White House note privately that it’s significant that Woodward attributed the theory to Clinton advisers and not White House aides or Obama advisers, signaling this may only have traction among Clinton supporters hoping she would move one step closer to the Oval Office and be set up as the likely Democratic nominee for president in 2016.

Video: Woodward: ‘Hard to be president’

Woodward is the author of “Obama’s Wars,” a book that takes a close look at deliberations between Obama, Biden, Clinton and all of the other top players inside the White House over sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. The journalist suggested Tuesday that Obama will need his secretary of state to bring the party together in two years.

“President Obama needs some of the women, Latinos, retirees that she did so well with during the [2008] primaries and, so they switch jobs, not out of the question, and the other interesting question is, Hillary Clinton could run in her own right in 2016 and be younger than Ronald Reagan when he was elected president,” he said.

Clinton will be 69 years old and three months in January 2017. President Ronald Reagan was just shy of his 70th birthday in January, 1980.

“Now you talk to Hillary Clinton or her advisers and they say ‘no, no there’s not a political consideration here,’” Woodward continued. “Of course the answer is — you point out to them that her clout around the world when she goes to Europe, Asia, anywhere, is in part, not just because she’s secretary of state or because she was married to President Clinton, (but) that people see a potential future president in her.”

Back in 2008, Biden also suggested that as former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his dream job was secretary of state. But Democratic officials privately say that after getting a taste of the number-two job as vice president, they find it hard to believe Biden still wants to be secretary of state, which would now be seen as a step down.

White House denies Obama-Clinton ticket in the works

Dems look to curb expected losses

Washington (CNN) — Democrats know they are going to lose congressional seats in the November elections. The question is what can they do to minimize the damage?

With less than a month to voting day, even the most ardent Democrats conceded on Sunday talk shows that the outlook wasn’t rosy.

They differed on whether they can retain majorities in both the House and Senate, with the House considered more vulnerable, but all agreed there will be fewer of them working in Congress next year.

Republicans certainly believe it. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who chairs the National Republican Senatorial Committee, predicted a GOP “tsunami” at the polls.

While he declined to offer a specific prediction on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Cornyn added he expected a “good day” on November 2, adding: “I don’t know how high or how wide that tsunami will be, but I think it will be significant.”

His Democratic counterpart, Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, warned on the same program against counting any electoral chickens before they hatch.

“With midterm election history, the president’s party, going to back to the Civil War, it means the president’s party loses seats,” conceded Menendez, who heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. “But the difference between a tsunami and losing some seats is the suggestion that they can take over the majority. That will not happen.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, one of the most visible carriers of the Democratic banner, agreed that the Senate majority was safe, but he was unwilling to offer a similar guarantee for the House.

“I think we’re definitely going to keep the Senate,” Rendell said on the CBS program “Face the Nation.” “And I think we have a chance to win the House because I believe that Democrats, including the base, are starting to come back.”

Video: Momentum swinging back to Democrats?

From liberal to moderate, all the Democrats interviewed Sunday concurred that the party has to offer voters a unified message that clearly contrasts their agenda with what Republicans have done and are doing.

The goal, they said, is to energize the party’s liberal base and convince independents that it is Democrats looking out for working-class Americans while Republicans represent special interests and corporate fat cats.

One line of attack, already employed by Obama and other Democratic leaders, is to blame Republicans for deploying a strategy of congressional obstruction instead of trying to work out differences on major issues.

“They do not want America to succeed,” independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a far-left liberal who sits with the Democratic caucus, told the CBS program. “They’re into politics.”

Asked if he meant such a harsh appraisal, Sanders responded: “I would say that, given the choice between regaining power or obstructing the initiatives that create jobs, that protect the American people, yes, I think gaining power is their major initiative.”

Democrats also have to put aside any internal debate over whether Obama’s administration and congressional leaders have too easily compromised away policies and provisions sought by the party’s progressive wing, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said on “Face the Nation.”

“We should stop firing at each other; we’ve got enough people, the Republicans, firing at us already,” Richardson said. “We don’t need these divisions in the party.”

To Richardson, Obama has to lead the Democratic charge in the final weeks of campaigning to make sure voters understand the choice before them regarding economic policies and other key issues.

“It’s not enough to say, ‘OK, American people, give us credit because we Democrats prevented it from getting any worse,’ ” Richardson said of a standard message from Obama and Democratic leaders. “You’ve got to be positive. You’ve got to talk about jobs, and you’ve got to talk about the economy, and you’ve got to connect with people emotionally.”

Republicans are making Obama and his policies the issue of the campaign, even though it is not a presidential election year and all the races are at the statewide or district level.

“I think this election really is about the president’s agenda,” Senate candidate Rand Paul of Kentucky — who is backed by the Tea Party movement — said on “FOX News Sunday.” “Do you support the president’s agenda or do you not support it? I think his agenda’s wrong for America.”

On the same program, Paul’s Democratic opponent — state Attorney General Jack Conway — backed some Obama achievements, including health care reform, but adopted the stance of Republicans, including Paul, and some other Democrats on extending the Bush-era tax cuts to everyone.

Obama and Democratic leaders favor extending the lower tax rates to the 98 percent of people earning up to $200,000 a year as individuals or $250,000 as families, while letting the rates for the other 2 percent return to higher levels from the 1990s.

The president says it is too expensive for the government to borrow the additional $700 billion over 10 years needed to extend the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

However, Conway agreed with Senate Republicans, who pledged a filibuster against allowing anyone’s tax rates to go higher, as well as some Senate and House Democrats unwilling to vote for what opponents would label a tax increase so close the November election.

“I think that raising taxes, we shouldn’t be doing it as we recover from recession,” Conway said Sunday.

Polls show Conway may be starting to erode a big lead by Paul, the Tea Party favorite who defeated a mainstream Republican candidate in the primary vote. To Richardson, such primary upsets by social conservatives such as Paul in Kentucky and Christine O’Donnell in Delaware present an opportunity for Democrats to highlight how the Tea Party influence has shifted the Republican agenda further to the right

“I also think we should take on the Tea Party,” he said on CBS. “For some reason everyone is scared of them. What they really want to do to this country when they talk about reducing deficits is they’re cutting into Medicare, Medicaid, firefighters, teachers, nurses, people’s benefits, Social Security.”

Cornyn, however, said the Tea Party movement is only expressing a deeper and wider political desire among the American people.

“They want us to stop the runway spending, the unsustainable debt, and they want to put America back to work,” Cornyn said on CNN. “And they see the big-government American policies of the last year and a half being an impediment to job creation in America.”

Another Republican, Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, said the new faces in Congress after November will bring an unpredictable atmosphere.

“There are going to be a lot of new faces and probably some pretty strongly-held views,” Thune said on the C-SPAN program “Newsmakers.” “We’ll see how that works.”

Dems look to curb expected losses

Big labor mobilizing Tea Party alternative

Bensalem, Pennsylvania (CNN) — It sounds like a political classified ad.

“Wanted: unemployed voters.” That’s the message from one of the nation’s biggest labor unions, the AFL-CIO.

Between now and Election Day, the union’s community outreach organization known as Working America will be recruiting jobless Americans for a new political movement.

The idea? To match the energy of the conservative Tea Party movement. The goal? To keep Democrats in power in Washington.

“We want to give people a choice,” said Kim McMurry, a union organizer with Working America.

This week, McMurry met with a group of unemployed workers inside the home of Angela Oravsky, an unemployed mother who says she is burning through her daughter’s college savings money just to pay the rent.

“I don’t care if I have to scream from the rooftops, knock on doors. We have to come together as unemployed people,” she said.

Another unemployed mother, Liz Lassiter, wiped away tears as she described how she had to live in her car during last year’s brutal winter after losing her home.

“I’m looking everywhere, I mean, you know, McDonalds, Wawa, anywhere,” she said.

The meeting was both cathartic and strategic.

Also on the agenda was a discussion on how to rally other jobless friends, relatives and neighbors to get behind Democratic candidates.

Union organizers with Working America said the gathering is one of countless meetings across the country over the next month.

Oravsky will speak at the One Nation rally Saturday on the National Mall in Washington. The event was organized by a coalition of unions and liberal-leaning groups to give voters an alternative to the conservative message offered at Tea Party rallies.

It’s no accident that union organizers are trying to rally Democrats in Oravsky’s hometown of Bensalem. She lives in a crucial swing congressional district, where incumbent Democratic Rep. Patrick Murphy is in danger of losing his seat.

Murphy won the seat in 2006 by beating Republican Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick. The two are now in a rematch that could affect the balance of power in the House of Representatives.

“If there are more people like me in Washington, we’ll have a reasonable health care bill and lower taxes,” Fitzpatrick said as he touted his plan to put Pennsylvanians back to work. “Lower taxes will permit the businessperson to create jobs,” he added.

Murphy was not available for an interview.

Oravsky is out to prove that unemployed Americans are ready to roll up their sleeves, even if it’s for a political cause.

“I’m tired of people saying ‘these people are lazy. They need to get a job, they need to get off of unemployment.’ I would do anything, and anybody at this table would do anything, for work,” she said.

Big labor mobilizing Tea Party alternative

Tea Party: Return to basics or divisive force?

Washington (CNN) — Depending on who is talking, the Tea Party movement is either an extremist force dividing Republicans or a group of disgruntled taxpayers setting the government on a proper course.

The conservative political force has shaken up this year’s congressional elections, backing candidates who defeated Republican incumbents and other mainstream GOP candidates in primaries across the country.

Sal Russo, chief strategist for the Tea Party Express — the most organized and visible of the movement’s factions — told the CBS program “Face the Nation” that his group is a political action committee comprising members limited to donations of up to $5,000 with no corporate contributions allowed.

“We’re the purest form of democracy, I think, in the Tea Party movement, in the sense that when we want to do something, we don’t have any money to start with, we have to send an e-mail out to our people and say, ‘Hey, we think Sharron Angle is going to be a great candidate in Nevada, and do you want to get behind her?’ ” Russo said Sunday.

The end result, he said, would be the election of candidates “willing to stand up for more responsible fiscal policy in Washington.”

“We’ve turned the political system on its head,” Russo said. “And what’s done that is that millions of Americans, who, many of them, had been sitting out the political process, have gotten involved in the campaigns.”

However, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber, told CNN’s “State of the Union” program that candidates such as Angle showed the negative impact of the Tea Party movement on the political right.

Republican primary victories by Tea Party-backed nominees over mainstream contenders such as Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and nine-term Delaware Rep. Mike Castle end up giving Democratic contenders a chance to win previously out-of-reach races in November, he said.

Video: Tea Party activists: Here to stay

Video: Florida’s Tea Party surprise

Video: Campaign Twitter wars

RELATED TOPICS

“When the Tea Party becomes the gatekeeper of a Republican primary, we end up with contests we never dreamed of,” Durbin said. “Who would have guessed that today we would be taking an honest look at Alaska, Delaware, and Kentucky, where we clearly have races where the Democrats can win?”

Durbin also cited Florida, where Republican Marco Rubio’s Senate candidacy with Tea Party support caused Gov. Charlie Crist to wage an independent campaign, throwing the race into what Durbin called “turmoil.”

“I think that shows the Tea Party position is too extreme for most voters, and I think we’re going to do well in those states,” Durbin said. “People have to ask themselves, is this what we really want in the United States Senate?”

Rubio, interviewed on the CBS program, said he and the Tea Party movement reflected the “sentiment in mainstream America that Washington is broken.”

“We don’t want to change America,” he said in reference to President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign theme and agenda. “We want to fix things that are wrong in America.”

He advocated bedrock conservative positions, including a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, banning congressional earmarks and imposing term limits on Congress members.

However, his stance was more moderate on an issue important to the crucial senior citizen population in Florida — reforming Social Security to ensure its future solvency.

Rubio said benefits for current retirees or those close to retirement should remain fixed, and the system must survive for the younger and future generations without bankrupting the country.

“We’re going to have to accept there are going to be some changes,” he said, mentioning a possible future increase in the retirement age for eligibility.

Also on the program, another Tea Party-backed nominee — Colorado Republican Senate candidate Ken Buck — expressed similar conservative credentials.

“I see myself as part of a group of candidates who have been elected in this country because of frustration with what’s happening in Washington, D.C.,” Buck said.

“We’re going there not to be part of the establishment, not to be part of what we consider the problem in Washington, D.C., but to get there and to reduce spending, to promote ideas like a balanced-budget amendment and term limits and ideas that have been talked about for a while,” he said.

The Tea Party-backed candidates interviewed Sunday made no mention of the “Pledge to America” document released last week by House Republicans as a proposal for how they would govern if in power.

Democrats criticized the economic-focused program that includes reduced spending, lower taxes and other bedrock GOP positions as a rehash of failed past policies.

In an editorial Saturday, the New York Times called the document “a bid to co-opt the Tea Party by a Republican leadership that wants to sound insurrectionist but is the same old Washington elite.”

“Not only are the players the same, the policies are the same,” the editorial said. “Just more tax cuts for the rich and more deficit spending. We find it hard to believe that even the most disaffected voters will be taken in.”

Conservative Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana told the NBC program “Meet the Press” that the “Pledge to America” represented a return to Republican roots.

“Republicans didn’t just lose our majority in 2006, we lost our way,” Pence said. “We walked away from the principles of fiscal discipline and reform that minted our governing majority back in 1980 and again in 1994. And the American people walked away from us.”

Conceding that the proposals in the document are “not necessarily new,” Pence said it represented a commitment to “important first steps in this Congress to steer our national government back to” basic principles and practices.

Tea Party: Return to basics or divisive force?

GOP unveils ‘Pledge to America’

Sterling, Virginia (CNN) — House Republicans sought to recapture the spirit of their 1994 election landslide Thursday, unveiling a 21-page “Pledge to America” that includes promises to slash taxes, cut government and reverse President Barack Obama’s health care reforms.

Among other things, House GOP leaders pledged to permanently extend all of the Bush-era tax cuts due to expire at the end of this year — including for individuals making over $250,000.

They also proposed giving small businesses a tax deduction equal to 20 percent of their income, while requiring Congress to review any new federal regulations that add to the deficit.

They pushed a domestic spending freeze, with the exception of certain politically sensitive programs such as veterans’ benefits.

While stressing the need to reduce spiraling deficits, they did not offer specifics on how to restrain the growth of entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

The document also lacks a pledge against unrelated pet projects that members of Congress often insert in spending bills to bring funding to their home districts — known as earmarks. Banning earmarks is typically a staple of Republican policy.

“The federal government is too big, it spends too much, and it’s out of control,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. The current federal government “isn’t listening” and “doesn’t get it.”

“Our government has failed us,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-California. “The land of opportunity has become the land of shrinking prosperity. … People are outraged.”

The House GOP leadership unveiled its proposal at a lumber company in northern Virginia.

Some provisions in the GOP document match positions of the conservative Tea Party movement that has helped defeat mainstream Republican candidates in several primary elections this year. For example, the document calls for a federal hiring freeze on nonsecurity employees and requiring all legislation to include a clause showing that it is authorized under the Constitution.

Other items would cancel unspent funding authorized by the economic stimulus bill, roll back spending to levels before the stimulus bill and earlier federal bailout legislation and repeal the health care reform bill passed in March.

The document also calls for permanently prohibiting taxpayer funding for abortion.

Several Republican sources said there was no intention to directly address social issues because the electorate is so heavily focused on jobs and spending.

Republican leaders settled on a line that states: “We pledge to honor families, traditional marriage, life, and the private and faith-based organizations that form the core of our American values.”

This language was a late addition, according to a GOP source, after conservative Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana argued that social issues should be included in the document representing the agenda of House Republicans.

The top Republican in the Senate immediately endorsed the plan, calling it a key step in the GOP’s push to cut the overall size of the federal government.

“The House Republican plan is a clear and forceful response to these concerns, and working together, House and Senate Republicans will continue to fight for the principles upon which it is based,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky.

House Democratic leaders, in contrast, said the document showed that Republicans want to return to what they called failed policies of the past. A statement from House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s office on Wednesday mocked the GOP positions, saying they showed that Republicans pledged allegiance to hedge fund managers on Wall Street, insurance companies, the “wealthiest of the wealthy,” oil companies and big corporations that outsource jobs, “with a recession and huge deficits for all.”

The GOP document represents an updated version of the 1994 “Contract with America.” That much shorter, 10-item document, with specific bills attached to each item that would be passed with a Republican victory, was rolled out on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and signed by GOP members of Congress and candidates.

The 2010 version has more than 20 items, including changes to how Congress works and broad policy goals such as tougher sanctions against Iran. While it does contain legislative proposals, it does not include specific bills that would be introduced and passed if Republicans gain control of the House.

A GOP lawmaker involved in putting together the document told CNN Wednesday that House Republicans realize voters are angry with both Democrats and Republicans. The agenda contained in the “Pledge to America” is intended to convince such voters that their concerns are taken seriously by Republicans, who will act differently if returned to power than they did when controlling Congress during parts of the Bush administration, the legislator said.

CNN’s Tom Cohen, Alan Silverleib and Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report

GOP unveils ‘Pledge to America’

Senate to begin ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal debate?

Washington (CNN) — Despite a high-profile push from pop star Lady Gaga and other gay rights supporters, the outcome of a key Senate vote Tuesday on whether to begin debate on legislation that includes a repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy remains too close to call.

Republicans appear united against the measure, including some GOP senators who favor lifting the Pentagon’s requirement that gays and lesbians keep their sexuality a secret. The Republican opponents are upset that Democratic leaders so far refuse to allow GOP amendments to the broader National Defense Authorization Act that includes the “don’t ask, don’t tell” provision.

Lady Gaga spoke at an afternoon rally in Maine to pressure the state’s two Republican senators — Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins — to join Democrats in overcoming an expected filibuster attempt. To loud cheers from the crowd, Gaga said she was proposing a new law titled, “If you don’t like it, go home,” which would remove homophobic straight soldiers from the military instead of gay soldiers.

“If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home,” she shouted.

Without the support of the Maine senators, Democrats are unlikely to muster the 60 votes needed to proceed with debate on the defense authorization plan. Both oppose the policy, and Collins was the sole Republican vote in the Senate Armed Services Committee in support of getting rid of it.

But in a statement issued Monday night, Collins said she would side with the rest of the GOP because the Democratic leadership of the Senate “intends to shut Republicans out of the debate.”

Video: Gaga asks senators to repeal ‘don’t ask’

Video: Gays, lesbians and the GOP

Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is “simply not fair.” But she said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and Democrats “an equal opportunity” to offer amendments to the defense bill.

“Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the majority leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement so that the Senate can debate the defense bill this week,” Collins said.

In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full debate on the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal before the military has completed its review.

“We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the implementation of any new changes,” Snowe’s statement said.

The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill, would not rescind “don’t ask, don’t tell” until after the Pentagon completes a review of the repeal’s impact on the military. The review is due in December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that the military could handle repealing the policy.

Many Republicans complain that Congress should not step in until after that military review is completed.

Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said approving a repeal provision before finishing the review process would amount to an insult to military personnel.

McCain also is unhappy that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, opted to include in the defense bill a controversial immigration provision that offers a path to citizenship for students who are children of illegal immigrants.

Reid “is turning legislation on our national defense into a political football,” McCain said last week. “Politically controversial amendments are crowding out our limited time to debate actual military and defense-related legislation.”

A GOP leadership aide criticized Reid for planning to debate the “don’t ask, don’t tell” and immigration amendments before the Senate breaks for mid-term elections, even though Reid has said a final vote on the bill would not happen until a post-election session.

“The vote tomorrow is not to get on the defense bill, it’s to set up a series of votes on a political wish list,” the aide said.

Reid denied last week that his scheduling was motivated by politics.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs chairman, have said publicly they support repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

The military already has working groups looking at how it would implement the change if ordered. The groups are looking at everything from housing to entitlements, and even personal displays of affection.

CNN’s Chris Lawrence contributed to this report.

Senate to begin ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal debate?