Tag Archives: california

Campaign Circus: Obama vs. his cousin in 2012?

Washington (CNN) — As Election Day gets closer, the rhetoric gets more intense, interesting and, shall we say, passionate. Here are some things you might have missed.

Obama’s cousin to take him on in 2012?

Don Cordell, an 83-year-old retired engineer from California, plans to run against President Obama in 2012. Cordell told AOL News that he is a distant cousin to 22 presidents — including George W. Bush, Obama and George Washington, to name a few.

Harry Reid the default option?

Nevadan Joyce Ferrara told CNN affiliate KVVU that when she went to vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s name was already selected. An election official claims there is no fraud.

‘He had me at hope and change’

The College Republican National Committee, in a new video entitled “Break Up,” says it wants to put an end to its relationship with President Obama. Wait — they’ve liked him this whole time?

Scooping the poop

Obama cut out of a fundraiser in Rhode Island on Monday night, according to the Provindence Journal, saying that he couldn’t stay for dinner because he had to “go home to tuck in the girls and walk the dog and scoop the poop.”

Say what?

Sean Bielat, the Republican taking on openly gay Democratic Rep. Barney Frank in Massachusetts, is under fire for telling the Boston Herald that gays and lesbians don’t have the right to serve in the military, just as short people don’t.

Picture of the day: He’s not having any of it

A police officer assigned to President Obama’s Moving America Forward rally at the University of Southern California appears to be having a bad day in a Getty Images photo of the rally.

Campaign Valley of the Dolls

Two well-publicized candidates — one known for her unique name (Krystal Ball) and the other for his Rent Is Too Damn High party (Jimmy McMillan) — have received a special honor, according to POLITICO.com: getting their own action figures made.

Reid staffer gone amid fake marriage revelation

A staffer for Reid no longer works for the senator, amid reports the staffer orchestrated a sham marriage in order to provide a Lebanese man with American citizenship, a spokesman for Reid said.

Campaign Circus: Obama vs. his cousin in 2012?

GOP sniping up after Tea Party wins

Washington (CNN) — Tea Party euphoria confronted reality Sunday, with Delaware Senate primary winner Christine O’Donnell backing out of scheduled talk show appearances amid talk of possible civil war among Republicans over the conservative movement.

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski accused the Tea Party Express of infusing money and lies into her Republican primary to swing it against her.

Now waging a write-in campaign to retain her seat, against the wishes of mainstream Republicans, Murkowski told CNN that fellow party members were inciting inner-GOP conflict.

“What happened in my particular race, you had the Tea Party Express, this California-based group, come in at the last minute in a campaign, run a mudslinging, smear — just a terrible, terrible campaign, with lies and fabrications and mischaracterization,” Murkowski said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “They came in, they dumped $600,000 into a small market here in Alaska, and they absolutely clearly influenced the outcome of that election.”

Murkowski accused conservative GOP Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina, who backed her victorious opponent in the primary, of undermining fellow Republicans.

“I don’t think that it’s particularly helpful to undercut fellow Republicans, but as I say, it’s his prerogative,” Murkowski said of DeMint, later adding: “I think that he has made people uncomfortable. I think that he has kind of rattled the cages. Whether it advances to a full-on civil war, I don’t know.”

On the same program, DeMint said in a pre-recorded interview that his efforts have helped Republican chances of regaining control of the Senate in November’s mid-term elections.

“The only reason we have a chance at a majority now is in large part for the candidates I’ve been supporting,” DeMint said.

Video: Murkowski defends her write-in decision

DeMint’s support for Joe Miller over Murkowski and for O’Donnell in Delaware, who defeated veteran Republican Rep. Mike Castle in Tuesday’s Delaware primary for Vice President Joe Biden’s former Senate seat, caused consternation in GOP party circles.

Some fear such extreme conservative candidates can’t win statewide races and are unprepared for the scrutiny of such a campaign.

O’Donnell added to such concerns by canceling previously agreed-to interviews on “FOX News Sunday” and the CBS program “Face the Nation,” deciding instead to make appearances in Delaware.

Bob Schieffer, the host of the CBS program, said on air that O’Donnell’s representatives denied she withdrew because of videotape released over the weekend showing her talking about dabbling in witchcraft.

Whatever the reason, O’Donnell continued to serve as a lightning rod for analysis of the influence of the Tea Party movement. She was given little chance of defeating Castle, but received late support from former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as well as Tea Party money, and pulled off the upset.

Now the 11-year-old “witchcraft” video and others becoming public are reinforcing the image preferred by Democrats of O’Donnell as an unknown, untested and risky candidate.

Republican strategist Ed Rollins acknowledged the problem on the CBS program, saying O’Donnell was off to a rocky beginning.

“Right now this campaign’s about her,” said Rollins, who is a CNN senior political analyst. “Unless she gets her ship righted … this is not a good start.”

Another top GOP strategist, former Bush White House aide Karl Rove, softened his earlier criticism of O’Donnell, whom he described as unelectable last Tuesday.

Appearing on the FOX program, Rove joined other mainstream Republicans in supporting the O’Donnell campaign but called Murkowski’s write-in campaign selfish and ultimately unsuccessful.

“She’s going to lose,” Rove said. “Who would’ve thought that one of the most conservative states in the country ran the risk of having two liberal Democrats who follow the Obama line representing in the United States Senate? And that’s what she could do as a spoilsport.”

He added: “This is sad and sorry.”

At the same time, Rove denied there was “civil war” between the Tea Party movement and Republicans.

Democrats conceded that the Tea Party movement reflects real anger and frustration with continuing high unemployment and the growing federal deficit.

However, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine, the former Virginia governor, told CNN that voters now have clear choices for the November elections with the primary season completed.

“I think the Republicans are moving way to the right of the American electorate,” Kaine said of the Tea Party movement’s influence.

CNN’s Alexander Mooney and Mariano Castillo contributed to this story.

GOP sniping up after Tea Party wins

Blagojevich deliberations will go into third week

(CNN) — If the Rod Blagojevich trial were a movie, it could be called Lost in Deliberation.

The fate of the former Illinois governor is in the hands of a jury that can’t seem to make up its mind.

Two weeks have gone by. And if the note the jury sent to the judge on Thursday is any indication, the deliberations are likely to drag into a third week.

But will this be a record for jury deliberations? Not by a long shot.

In 2004, a mother and son sued Long Beach, California, saying the city was violating federal law by not allowing them to open up residential homes for Alzheimer’s patients.

A jury took four months deciding the multimillion dollar case, which is believed to be a record for the mainland United States.

But that’s nothing compared to a case in Guam in 2001, where the jury spent a whopping 15 months to render a decision in a big-dollar civil case.

“We have the record even though there is no agency that tracks deliberation times,” said Dick Williams, the lead attorney in the Guam case. “In the legal lore, our case is thought of as the longest.”

The case involved a lawsuit against two construction firms after an earthquake toppled a resort hotel in Guam.

The first indication that the verdict would take a while came when the jury sent a note to the judge that had nothing to do with the evidence in the case.

“The first request from the jury on the first day of deliberations was for two refrigerators,” Williams said.

While they wait, lawyers and nervous clients can only look to questions and requests the jury makes to the judge for clues on when a verdict may come.

Other than that, what happens in the jury room is a secret.

In the Blagojevich federal corruption case, the former governor faces charges including racketeering, wire fraud, attempted extortion and bribery.

The two-term Democrat was removed from office in January 2009 amid accusations that he attempted to sell the U.S. Senate seat that had been occupied by Barack Obama before he became president.

On Thursday, the jury sent a note that suggested that it was far from reaching a decision.

The panel had only decided on two of the 24 counts against Blagojevich, the note said. It failed to agree on 11 counts and had yet to consider 11 others, involving wire fraud charges. They were implored to keep working.

A judge has a few tools to move a jury toward reaching a decision in a case.

He or she can step in and ask the jury if it is deadlocked and then declare a hung jury.

This leads to a mistrial and a possibility that a case would have to be re-tried.

This option does not seem likely in the Blagojevich case, some legal experts say.

“I think the judge will be patient in this case,” said Jessica Gabel, a law professor at Georgia State University.

“The larger issue is if there is a hung jury, this could be very costly in a time when prosecutors cannot afford it. The case would have to tried all over again and with the media and paparazzi and everything that goes along with this case, it could become very costly.”

One of Blagojevich’s lawyers has already told the Chicago Tribune that the wait is affecting him. He hasn’t been able to eat or sleep, according to the attorney.

Those who have been through longer waits have some advice.

“In my case, I just tried not to think about it,” said Barry Litt, who was an attorney in the Long Beach case.

“After it gets past five days, any trial lawyer will start to get anxious.”

In the Blagojevich case, Monday will be Day 13.

Blagojevich deliberations will go into third week

Judge overturns California’s ban on same-sex marriage

(CNN) — A federal judge in California on Wednesday struck down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that voter-approved Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution — handing supporters of gay rights a major victory in a case that both sides say is sure to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The 136-page opinion, issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco, is an initial step in what will likely be a lengthy fight over California’s Proposition 8, which defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

At stake in the trial was whether California’s ban on same-sex marriage violates gay couples’ rights to equal protection and due process, as protected by the U.S. Constitution.

The high-profile case is being watched closely by both supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage, as many say it is destined to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. If it does, the case could result in a landmark decision on whether people in the United States are allowed to marry people of the same sex.

Video: ‘Today we eliminate discrimination’

Video: ‘This is just the first document’

Video: Same-sex marriage ban overturned

Same-sex marriage is currently legal in five U.S. states and in the District of Columbia, while civil unions are permitted in New Jersey. The five states are Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa and New Hampshire.

“Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples,” Walker, who was appointed to the federal bench by former President Ronald Reagan, wrote in his opinion.

“Race restrictions on marital partners were once common in most states but are now seen as archaic, shameful or even bizarre,” he added. “Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals.”

In a separate order, Walker also granted supporters of Proposition 8 a temporary stay, which stops his decision from taking immediate effect. They had argued, prior to his ruling, that same-sex marriages would be performed soon after his decision and could be complicated by rulings and appeals farther down the legal road.

LINKS

PDF: Ruling on Proposition 8

Reaction to the ruling

iReport.com: Your reaction

Walker gave both sides in the case until Friday to submit their responses to the order.

Elated supporters of same-sex marriage gathered to celebrate the judge’s opinion in the Castro district of San Francisco. After speeches and songs, they began a march to city hall. People waved rainbow flags and U.S. flags, and carried signs that read, “We all deserve the freedom to marry,” and “Separate is Unequal.” Similar rallies unfolded in cities across California — including Los Angeles and San Diego.

“For our entire lives, our government and the law have treated us as unequal. This decision to ensure that our constitutional rights are as protected as everyone else’s makes us incredibly proud of our country,” said Kristin Perry, a plaintiff.

Perry and Sandy Stier, along with Jeffrey Zarrillo and Paul Katami, are the two couples at the heart of the case, which if appealed would go next to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before possibly heading to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Opponents of same-sex marriage have said their best bet lies with higher courts, and vowed to appeal the federal judge’s ruling.

In a national survey, conducted by Gallup in May, 53 percent of respondents said same-sex marriages should not be recognized by law, while 44 percent said they should.

Proposition 8 is part of a long line of seesaw rulings, court cases, debates and protests over the controversial issue of same-sex marriage. It passed in California with some 52 percent of the vote in November 2008.

“Big surprise! We expected nothing different from Judge Vaughn Walker, after the biased way he conducted this trial,” said Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage. “With a stroke of his pen, Judge Walker has overruled the votes and values of 7 million Californians who voted for marriage as one man and one woman.”

Judge overturns California’s ban on same-sex marriage

Birthplace of the drive-thru bans them to curb obesity

By

Gloria Goodale,

Charles Rangel ethics case tests new Congressional openness

By

Gail Russell Chaddock,

Could a $1.50 marijuana joint doom Prop. 19 in California?

By

Patrik Jonsson,

California passed a law requiring schools that accept technology funding to educate students about copyright, plagiarism, and the basics of Internet safety.

nocopyright

In 2006, California passed a law requiring schools that accept technology funding to educate students about copyright, plagiarism, and the basics of Internet safety. Other states have since considered similar laws. We saw this as an opportunity to help teach students their rights and responsibilities when using technology.

But when we surveyed existing digital education resources related to copyright, we were dismayed to find that much of the available material relied on inaccurate generalizations about technology and law. Rather than presenting unbiased facts and encouraging inquiry, the materials focused on drilling students on the prohibitions of copyright. As avid users of technology ourselves, we could not stand by and let this educational opportunity become an excuse to scare young people away from making full and fair use of the digital technologies that will continue to affect virtually every aspect of their lives.

We decided to fill in the gap by developing an honest, accurate, and balanced curriculum that would help students understand and exercise their digital rights and responsibilities. Working with educators from around the country, we aimed to design a fun and flexible plan that would not just provide information, but also help foster basic skills in research, writing, and critical thinking.

We’re proud of the result. The Teaching Copyright curriculum is a detailed, customizable learning plan to help educators raise interesting questions about copyright, technology, and law, such as:

  • What is legal online?
  • How is creativity being enabled by new technologies?
  • What digital rights and responsibilities exist already, and what roles do we play as users of digital technology?

Through the Teaching Copyright curriculum, students and teachers will learn the answers to these questions and come to a greater understanding about the role of technology in our lives.

We want to make these materials useful and relevant to you, the classroom teacher. Let us know if you have any ideas on how we can improve and/or expand upon this curriculum. Send your questions or comments to us at tc@eff.org.