Monthly Archives: September 2010

Stephen Colbert congressional testimony: Why was he invited?

%content%
Stephen Colbert congressional testimony: Why was he invited?

Welcome to the world of hashtag politics — or #politics

Washington (CNN) — When a scuffle broke out at a candidate forum in Nevada last week between supporters of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican rival Sharron Angle, the fight didn’t end after tempers cooled. It simply moved over to the social media website Twitter, where the war of words in this nasty race continued.

One of Angle’s campaign managers, Jordan Gehrke, posted a tweet, a short message on Twitter, that accused Reid supporters of starting the fight. “Check out the video here of Reidbots screaming and heckling,” the tweet said.

The message included a link to a video that appears to show audience members at the forum shouting down Angle. That same tweet also included a hashtag — #dumpreid — made by attaching the # symbol to the message “dumpreid.” Twitter users who clicked on the #dumpreid link were taken to a feed of anti-Reid tweets.

Welcome to the new media world of hashtag politics, where the character attack is compressed into 140 characters — the website’s limit for tweets — and instantly blasted out to a campaign’s long list of “followers.”

“It was inevitable that negative politics would transform itself into social media. That’s exactly what’s happened,” said Larry Sabato, the director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics.

You don’t even need a complete sentence to change a campaign — just a phrase can change a campaign.
–Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics

“You don’t even need a complete sentence to change a campaign — just a phrase can change a campaign,” Sabato added.

Why pay for an attack ad when you can post a free attack tweet?

One recent Reid attack tweet — “Sharron Angle’s mocks health coverage for ‘autism’” — includes a link to a video that shows the Republican Senate candidate attacking mandates in the new health care law. Is it the tweet or the video that went viral? Answer: both.

Another Angle tweet, “Harry Reid’s plan to save the Nevada economy: coked-up stimulus monkeys,” was both acidic and inventive. Not only did it mock the real use of stimulus money to study the effects of illicit drugs on primates. The buzzworthy phrase “coked-up stimulus monkeys” was picked up by political writers across the country.

Campaign staffers are throwing mud via Twitter too. A tweet from an Angle campaign staffer refers to Reid’s handlers as “13 y/o girls.” And on it goes.

Video: Campaign Twitter wars

Video: Voters in a fighting mood

Michael Patrick Leahy, a Tea Party activist and co-creator of the hashtag #TCOT (or Top Conservatives on Twitter) said, “I think we’re about to enter a new era of American political history.”

Leahy’s “Tweeps” (Twitter slang for his followers) who click on #TCOT are transported to a virtual Tea Party, a nonstop feed where visitors tweet back and forth on the latest news in the conservative movement.

Leary’s website, tcotreport.com, ranks the top conservatives by number of followers on Twitter.

One of those “top conservatives,” former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, has more than 250,000 followers on Twitter. Her tweets go out not only to her legions of fans, but also to the nation’s top political journalists, who are following Palin’s every tweet.

“She can just put out a tweet and generate headlines in the traditional media,” Sabato said.

Those journalists, many of whom are also prolific Twitter users, often “retweet” or redistribute Palin’s tweets to their own lists of followers.

“The retweeting is how it really gets out there,” Sabato added, noting that last weekend marked the 50th anniversary of the first debate in the epic 1960 presidential race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon.

#timeshavechanged

Welcome to the world of hashtag politics — or #politics

Tea Party: Return to basics or divisive force?

Washington (CNN) — Depending on who is talking, the Tea Party movement is either an extremist force dividing Republicans or a group of disgruntled taxpayers setting the government on a proper course.

The conservative political force has shaken up this year’s congressional elections, backing candidates who defeated Republican incumbents and other mainstream GOP candidates in primaries across the country.

Sal Russo, chief strategist for the Tea Party Express — the most organized and visible of the movement’s factions — told the CBS program “Face the Nation” that his group is a political action committee comprising members limited to donations of up to $5,000 with no corporate contributions allowed.

“We’re the purest form of democracy, I think, in the Tea Party movement, in the sense that when we want to do something, we don’t have any money to start with, we have to send an e-mail out to our people and say, ‘Hey, we think Sharron Angle is going to be a great candidate in Nevada, and do you want to get behind her?’ ” Russo said Sunday.

The end result, he said, would be the election of candidates “willing to stand up for more responsible fiscal policy in Washington.”

“We’ve turned the political system on its head,” Russo said. “And what’s done that is that millions of Americans, who, many of them, had been sitting out the political process, have gotten involved in the campaigns.”

However, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber, told CNN’s “State of the Union” program that candidates such as Angle showed the negative impact of the Tea Party movement on the political right.

Republican primary victories by Tea Party-backed nominees over mainstream contenders such as Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and nine-term Delaware Rep. Mike Castle end up giving Democratic contenders a chance to win previously out-of-reach races in November, he said.

Video: Tea Party activists: Here to stay

Video: Florida’s Tea Party surprise

Video: Campaign Twitter wars

RELATED TOPICS

“When the Tea Party becomes the gatekeeper of a Republican primary, we end up with contests we never dreamed of,” Durbin said. “Who would have guessed that today we would be taking an honest look at Alaska, Delaware, and Kentucky, where we clearly have races where the Democrats can win?”

Durbin also cited Florida, where Republican Marco Rubio’s Senate candidacy with Tea Party support caused Gov. Charlie Crist to wage an independent campaign, throwing the race into what Durbin called “turmoil.”

“I think that shows the Tea Party position is too extreme for most voters, and I think we’re going to do well in those states,” Durbin said. “People have to ask themselves, is this what we really want in the United States Senate?”

Rubio, interviewed on the CBS program, said he and the Tea Party movement reflected the “sentiment in mainstream America that Washington is broken.”

“We don’t want to change America,” he said in reference to President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign theme and agenda. “We want to fix things that are wrong in America.”

He advocated bedrock conservative positions, including a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, banning congressional earmarks and imposing term limits on Congress members.

However, his stance was more moderate on an issue important to the crucial senior citizen population in Florida — reforming Social Security to ensure its future solvency.

Rubio said benefits for current retirees or those close to retirement should remain fixed, and the system must survive for the younger and future generations without bankrupting the country.

“We’re going to have to accept there are going to be some changes,” he said, mentioning a possible future increase in the retirement age for eligibility.

Also on the program, another Tea Party-backed nominee — Colorado Republican Senate candidate Ken Buck — expressed similar conservative credentials.

“I see myself as part of a group of candidates who have been elected in this country because of frustration with what’s happening in Washington, D.C.,” Buck said.

“We’re going there not to be part of the establishment, not to be part of what we consider the problem in Washington, D.C., but to get there and to reduce spending, to promote ideas like a balanced-budget amendment and term limits and ideas that have been talked about for a while,” he said.

The Tea Party-backed candidates interviewed Sunday made no mention of the “Pledge to America” document released last week by House Republicans as a proposal for how they would govern if in power.

Democrats criticized the economic-focused program that includes reduced spending, lower taxes and other bedrock GOP positions as a rehash of failed past policies.

In an editorial Saturday, the New York Times called the document “a bid to co-opt the Tea Party by a Republican leadership that wants to sound insurrectionist but is the same old Washington elite.”

“Not only are the players the same, the policies are the same,” the editorial said. “Just more tax cuts for the rich and more deficit spending. We find it hard to believe that even the most disaffected voters will be taken in.”

Conservative Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana told the NBC program “Meet the Press” that the “Pledge to America” represented a return to Republican roots.

“Republicans didn’t just lose our majority in 2006, we lost our way,” Pence said. “We walked away from the principles of fiscal discipline and reform that minted our governing majority back in 1980 and again in 1994. And the American people walked away from us.”

Conceding that the proposals in the document are “not necessarily new,” Pence said it represented a commitment to “important first steps in this Congress to steer our national government back to” basic principles and practices.

Tea Party: Return to basics or divisive force?

US seeks to dismiss suit filed for radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki

%content%
US seeks to dismiss suit filed for radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki

White House wants al-Awlaki suit tossed

%content%
White House wants al-Awlaki suit tossed

Months after W.V. coal mining disaster, new US rule on coal dust

%content%
Months after W.V. coal mining disaster, new US rule on coal dust

Pelosi won’t rule out House tax cut vote

%content%
Pelosi won’t rule out House tax cut vote

Colbert serious, sarcastic in hearing

Washington (CNN) — There’s nothing funny about the issue of migrant farm labor — unless Comedy Central’s Stephen Colbert is discussing it.

Colbert, accompanied by a media swarm, sarcastically testified on Capitol Hill Friday about the conditions facing America’s undocumented farm workers. The popular host of “The Colbert Report” told members of a House Judiciary subcommittee that he hoped to bring attention to the workers’ hardships.

“I certainly hope that my star power can bump this hearing all the way up to C-SPAN 1,” he joked.

“America’s farms are presently far too dependent on immigrant labor to pick our fruits and vegetables,” he told the subcommittee, keeping in character with the arch-conservative he plays on television.

“Now, the obvious answer is for all of us to stop eating fruits and vegetables. And if you look at the recent obesity statistics, many Americans have already started.”

Video: Colbert shows serious side

Video: Mr. Colbert goes to Capitol Hill

Colbert told the panel that “we all know there is a long tradition of great nations importing foreign workers to do their farm work.”

“After all,” he said, “it was the ancient Israelites who built the first food pyramids. But this is America. I don’t want a tomato picked by a Mexican. I want it picked by an American, then sliced by a Guatemalan, and served by a Venezuelan in a spa where a Chilean gives me a Brazilian.”

“My great-grandfather did not travel across four thousand miles of the Atlantic Ocean to see this nation overrun by immigrants,” he declared. “He did it because he killed a man back in Ireland. That’s the rumor.”

Colbert appeared before Congress the day after “The Colbert Report” showed video of him packing corn and picking beans on a farm as part of a challenge from a pro-immigrant-labor group.

“I’ll admit I started my work day with preconceived notions of migrant labor,” Colbert said. “But after working with these men and women … side by side in the unforgiving sun I have to say — and I do mean this sincerely — please don’t make me do this again. It is really, really hard.”

The brief experience, he said, “gave me some small understanding why so few Americans are clamoring to begin an exciting career as seasonal migrant field workers.”

Colbert appeared alongside, among others, United Farm Workers President Arturo Rodriguez, whose group over the summer launched “Take Our Jobs,” a campaign that challenged U.S. citizens to replace immigrants in farm work.

The group, which says only seven citizens or legal residents have taken it up on the offer, argues that immigrant workers aren’t taking citizens’ jobs, and is pushing for a bill that would give undocumented farm workers currently in the United States the right to earn legal status.

On his show Thursday night, Colbert mocked those deriding his appearance before the committee, saying he agreed that showing up in character would “sully the good name of experts that Republican-controlled Congresses have actually called to testify in the past,” like Elmo, the Sesame Street character who promoted music education before a House subcommittee in 2002.

Republicans on the subcommittee were not impressed or swayed by Colbert’s appearance.

“Maybe we should be spending less time watching Comedy Central and more time considering all the real jobs that are out there — ones that require real hard labor and ones that don’t involve sitting behind a desk,” said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

“If we did we’d realize that every day … Americans perform the dirtiest, most difficult, most dangerous (jobs) that can be thrown at them.”

Many of these workers, King said, “would prefer the aroma of fresh dirt to that of the sewage of American elitists who disparage them even as they flush.”

“It’s an insult to me to hear that Americans won’t do this work,” he added, arguing that the hiring of undocumented workers is driving down wages and taking jobs away from those in the country legally.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, used the occasion to rip the Obama administration’s immigration policy. The notion that there’s little competition for jobs between citizens and undocumented workers is a “myth,” he claimed.

“We could make millions of jobs available to American citizens … if the federal government simply enforced our immigration laws,” Smith asserted. “Unfortunately this administration is turning its back on American workers.”

Democrats were quick to challenge the Republicans’ claims.

While Americans will take tough jobs, “study after study” shows that “people would rather have no income and no welfare than take the back-breaking jobs that the migrant farm worker has to do every single day,” said Rep. Howard Berman, D-California.

“Were it not for immigrant farm workers in this country, there would be no seasonal fresh fruit and vegetables,” he said.

Most of the media attention, however, remained focused on Colbert. The chairwoman of the subcommittee, Rep. Zoe Lofrgen, D-California, told CNN’s Dana Bash before the hearing that she didn’t think Colbert’s appearance was a stunt.

“Celebrities add pizzazz to an issue,” she said. “I hope his celebrity will bring attention” to this one.

But another Democrat, Michigan Rep. John Conyers, initially seemed unimpressed with Colbert, asking him to leave the committee room and merely submit his written statement instead.

Colbert noted that he was testifying at Lofgren’s invitation, and said that he would remove himself at her request.

Conyers later told CNN he feared Colbert would create a “circus” atmosphere. But Colbert, who engaged in a question-and-answer session with the subcommittee, actually turned out to be “profound,” he said.

CNN’s Jason Hanna, Deirdre Walsh, Alison Harding and Catherine Shoichet contributed to this report

Colbert serious, sarcastic in hearing

Obama approval hits new low

Washington (CNN) — With little more than a month to go before the midterm elections, President Barack Obama’s approval rating has hit an all-time low.

Only 42 percent of Americans now approve of how Obama’s handling his job as president, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll. Fifty-four percent disapprove of his performance.

The figures represent a new low-water mark in the CNN/ORC poll for the president, who, almost two years into his term, continues to wrestle with public worries over a sluggish economy and exhaustion with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Congressional Democrats aren’t faring much better. They now face a nine-point deficit when likely voters are asked which party they’ll back in November, according to the poll.

Top non-partisan political analysts have given the Republicans a serious shot at picking up the 39 seats necessary to recapture the House of Representatives.

A solid majority of all Americans — 56 percent — say that Obama has fallen short of their expectations. As a result, the president is not in a position to help struggling Democratic candidates; only 37 percent of likely voters say they are more likely to vote for a congressional candidate backed by Obama.

In contrast, half of all likely voters now say they are likely to choose a candidate supported by the conservative Tea Party — contributing to the GOP’s 53 to 44 percent lead when such voters are asked which party’s candidate they will choose in November.

Also damaging the Democrats: the enthusiasm gap. Republicans in general are much more engaged and excited about voting than Democrats, according to the new poll.

One cautionary note for Republican candidates: voters aren’t wild about the GOP, either. Nearly half of likely voters who say they will vote Republican in the fall say they are doing so to oppose the Democrats, not to support the Republicans.

Also potentially cutting against GOP momentum: while nearly eight in 10 voters favor extending the Bush tax cuts for families making less than $250,000 a year, a majority oppose extending the cuts for families that make more than that amount.

Republicans have vehemently argued in favor of extending the cuts for the wealthiest Americans as well, arguing that a failure to do so would damage the recovery. Top Democrats, led by Obama, claim that the roughly $700 billion price tag associated with an extension of the cuts for the richest Americans would be fiscally irresponsible.

While the president’s approval ratings may seem grim, he has plenty of company among his most recent predecessors. Obama’s approval rating exactly matches that of Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter in September of their second years in office.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted September 21-23, with 1,010 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey’s overall sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points.

There is a 4.5 percent margin of error for the 506 likely voters questioned in the poll.

CNN’s Polling Director Keating Holland contributed to this report.

Obama approval hits new low

Obama, at UN, urges nations to support Middle East peace drive

%content%
Obama, at UN, urges nations to support Middle East peace drive