Monthly Archives: June 2010

Arizona governor: Most illegal immigrants ‘drug mules’

(CNN) — A labor union representing nearly 20,000 border patrol agents and staff Friday disputed comments made by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer that most illegal immigrants coming across the southern border are smuggling drugs.

Brewer initially made the comments earlier this month during a debate of Republican gubernatorial candidates. She repeated them Friday when asked by a reporter for the basis of the claim.

“Well, we all know that the majority of the people that are coming to Arizona and trespassing are now becoming drug mules,” Brewer said. “They’re coming across our borders in huge numbers. The drug cartels have taken control of the immigration.

“So they are criminals. They’re breaking the law when they are trespassing and they’re criminals when they pack the marijuana and the drugs on their backs.”

When pressed, Brewer explained that many are simply coming to the United States to look for work but “are accosted, and they become subjects of the drug cartels.”

T.J. Bonner of the National Border Patrol Council told CNN that Brewer’s claims were “clearly not the case.” Bonner said that some undocumented immigrants caught by border patrol agents have drugs on them, and that they sometimes blame pressure from the drug cartels.

But, he said, those claims have little credibility because drug smugglers are typically transporting much larger quantities of drugs. And besides, he said, if what Brewer said were true, there would be many more prosecutions for drug smuggling.

Brewer’s comments, Bonner said, don’t “comport with reality — that’s the nicest way to put it.”

Brewer doubled down on the comments later Friday, however, issuing a statement reiterating them.

“The simple truth is that the majority of human smuggling in our state is under the direction of the drug cartels, which are by definition smuggling drugs,” Brewer’s statement said, according to the Associated Press as reported in the Arizona Republic. “It is common knowledge that Mexican drug cartels have merged human smuggling with drug trafficking.”

Brewer said the “human rights violations that have taken place (by the cartels) victimizing immigrants and their families are abhorrent.”

Brewer’s statement is the center of a controversy over a recently passed law that requires law enforcement officials to ascertain the citizenship of the subject of any investigation if they have reason to believe their suspect is in this country illegally. The U.S. Department of Justice is considering whether to file suit against the law.

Arizona governor: Most illegal immigrants ‘drug mules’

Obama nominates new ambassador to Iraq

(CNN) — President Barack Obama nominated Ambassador James Jeffrey, currently the U.S. ambassador to Turkey, to be the next ambassador to Iraq on Friday.

Jeffrey has served as ambassador to Turkey since November 2008. He also served as special advisor to the Secretary of State for Iraq in Washington and was deputy chief of mission and charge d’affaires in Baghdad. He is replacing Christopher Hill, who began serving as ambassador in April 2009.

When he accepted the post last year, Hill said he would stay on for one year. In recent months, he agreed to stay on for the summer as government formation progressed.

Obama also announced that he nominated Robert Jackson to be ambassador to Cameroon and Alejandro Wolff to be ambassador to Chile. Jackson is currently the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Morocco. Wolff is the deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, a position he has held since December 2005.

The U.S. Senate must approve the President Obama’s nominations before the nominees take their positions.

Obama nominates new ambassador to Iraq

Should the US lean more on natural gas in its energy mix?

By

Mark Clayton,

Obama in Canada for economic summit

Toronto, Ontario (CNN) — President Obama arrived in Ontario on Friday for a series of high-stakes economic meetings with leaders from around the world.

Obama, who was greeted in Toronto by America’s ambassador to Canada, David Jacobson, is set to meet first with his counterparts in the G-8 nations, followed a broader G-20 summit over the weekend.

The meetings are taking place against a backdrop of continued economic uncertainty, with demands for more government stimulus balanced against fears of runaway deficits. At home, the Obama administration is struggling to push a new economic relief package through an increasingly skittish, debt-wary Congress. Overseas — particularly in Europe — leaders are increasingly being forced to enact unpopular fiscal austerity measures.

Also hovering over this weekend’s meetings is the specter of protests and violence, which have plagued other recent meetings of world economic leaders.

Friday morning, before departing the White House, Obama referred to agreements reached in the first two G-20 summits he attended and added, “This weekend in Toronto, I hope we can build on this progress by coordinating our efforts to promote economic growth, to pursue financial reform, and to strengthen the global economy.

Video: Poised to pass financial reform

RELATED TOPICS

“We need to act in concert for a simple reason: This (recent economic) crisis proved and events continue to affirm that our national economies are inextricably linked — and just as economic turmoil in one place can quickly spread to another, safeguards in each of our nations can help protect all nations.”

Obama fears that a rollback too soon from government stimulus packages would send the world back into recession. The European Union, on the other hand, has sent a letter to all G-20 leaders asking for substantial budget cuts to come no later than 2011.

Also high on the agenda will be reforms to global banking regulations. Although all G-20 nations have pledged banking reforms, the reforms being considered in Europe and North America are diverging. Britain, France and Germany are calling for taxes on banks to pay down deficits and cushion future financial shocks. The U.S. government wants to discourage additional taxes, which officials fear would stunt consumer demand.

The weekend’s sessions will offer a first appearance on the world stage for British Prime Minister David Cameron and Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan. Both leaders arrived in Toronto on Thursday.

The G-8 meeting opens Friday at Deerhurst Resort in the Muskoka region of Ontario. The G-20 meeting opens Saturday in Toronto.

CNN’s Jim Boulden contributed to this report

Obama in Canada for economic summit

‘Clock is ticking’ on immigration reform

Washington (CNN) — With Arizona’s controversial immigration law set to go into effect next month, calls for federal action on comprehensive immigration reform are growing louder.

But with other issues dominating Congress’ schedule, can the bill currently in the House gain any traction?

Yes, according to a leading Hispanic congressman involved in the immigration reform fight.

“We know the legislative clock is ticking. We know people are getting deported at the highest rate in modern history,” Rep. Luis Gutierrez said in remarks delivered at a news conference Thursday, attended by dozens of members of Congress. “We know that the Arizona law, which, unless something happens, will go into effect in about one month, is a call to action. It is a cry of frustration.”

Arizona’s law, signed by Gov. Jan Brewer in late April, requires police to question people about their status if they have been detained for another reason and if there’s reason to suspect they’re in the United States illegally. It also targets those who hire illegal immigrant laborers or knowingly transport them.

Read more about Arizona’s immigration law

More than a dozen states are now following Arizona’s lead in taking up legislation to deal with illegal immigration.

Gutierrez, a Democrat from Illinois and chairman of the Immigration Task Force of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said July will be a critical month in getting the House’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act on the front burner. The bill has more than 100 co-sponsors.

“After the August recess, we all know the chances of major action dwindle and that if the Arizona law is allowed to go into effect, it will cause massive disruptions and set a dangerous precedent,” he said.

Gutierrez believes that an immigration bill can be passed this year with bipartisan support from both legislative chambers, according to Gutierrez spokesman Douglas Rivlin.

“He has offered to bring 200 House Democrats to the table if the House Republicans can bring 20 and the math is similar in the Senate,” Rivlin said. “He would not be pushing it if it were impossible.”

On the Senate side, Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, and Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, have an immigration plan of their own, which was introduced in March.

“The American people deserve more than empty rhetoric and impractical calls for mass deportation,” the two senators said in a March 19 Washington Post op-ed. “We urge the public and our colleagues to join our bipartisan efforts in enacting these reforms.”

So far, the legislative plan has failed to gain traction and will probably be pushed aside as the Senate tackles the Supreme Court confirmation hearings and other issues such as financial regulatory reform.

Obama, though, has signaled that he is hopeful the senators’ plans will gain momentum.

But it’s not just members of Congress pushing for federal action.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano recently said that Congress should move on legislation while the administration strengthens security at the U.S.-Mexican border. She said it’s the federal government’s job to set immigration and border security policies.

“We need a single, functional immigration and border policy,” she said. “We cannot have 50 different state policies. It simply will not work for us.”

Case in point, advocates say: Voters in Fremont, Nebraska, passed a much-debated measure Monday that would prohibit businesses and landlords from hiring or renting to people who are in the United States illegally.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum — a leading immigrant advocacy organization — said in a statement Thursday that allowing states to create their own legislation would “create chaos and confusion for both immigrants and law enforcement while not fixing the immigration problem at its core.”

“We don’t need an uneven patchwork of state-based immigration laws; we need a comprehensive national solution,” Noorani added. “State-based immigration proposals should be a wake-up call to Congress, they need to take the steering wheel, fix the immigration problem and finally pass comprehensive immigration reform.”

Advocates for immigration reform legislation point to polls showing that Americans are not only concerned about the issue, but want federal action now.

In late May, a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll showed that six in 10 respondents found that the federal government should focus on stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the U.S., deporting those already here and supporting more border security.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll released in mid-June found that 52 percent of respondents said immigration enforcement should be under the control of the federal government, and 46 percent said immigration laws should be made and enforced by the states.

CNN’s Carol Cratty contributed to this report.

‘Clock is ticking’ on immigration reform

Gen. David Petraeus nod reopens issue of withdrawal deadline

By

Gail Russell Chaddock,

Obama’s choice of Petraeus a ‘masterstroke’

%content%
Obama’s choice of Petraeus a ‘masterstroke’

McChrystal incident a ‘learning moment’

Washington (CNN) — Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s resignation as top commander in Afghanistan on Wednesday should be looked at as a learning lesson, a former general said.

“We will all learn from it, and it will be a learning moment for the military as well as for people in Washington,” said retired Army Gen. Russel Honore, a CNN contributor. “It will remind all of those in uniform that we live by a code of conduct, and we live by a uniformed code of military justice. … It will remind us of that pledge and that oath that we will obey those [civilian] officers appointed over us.”

President Obama accepted McChrystal’s resignation “with considerable regret” and nominated Gen. David Petraeus, the head of the U.S. Central Command, to take his place.

The moves come in the wake of politically explosive remarks about about key administration officials — including Vice President Joe Biden — made by McChrystal and his aides in a Rolling Stone magazine profile of the general to be published Friday.

The consequences of McChrystal’s resignation is a positive thing, a foreign policy expert said.

“I think the consequences frankly are more positive than negative,” said Steve Clemons, the director for the American Strategy Program at the nonpartisan New America Foundation.

He noted Obama’s decision sends a clear signal that the mission will continue.

“Obama is indicating that he doesn’t want to shift at all, at least in the time being, the military strategy,” Clemons said. “It’s a very strong signal that this was not about strategy.”

Clemons added that to some degree, replacing McChrystal with Petraeus showed the president is doubling down on the counterinsurgency approach.

Video: Gen. McChrystal arrives at White House

Video: McChrystal article author speaks out

Video: Obama ‘did the right thing’

“Petraeus really knows at a granular level the entire operation, and he’s familiar with not only the entire operation; he’s been meeting with these people regularly in both Pakistan and Afghanistan sides. So he’s wedged into this,” he said.

CNN Chief National Correspondent John King said Petraeus was tapped to lead the mission because he knows the strategy and can go tomorrow and pick it up.

“And because he has the credibility of the United States Congress and around the world,” King added.

But how are service members in Afghanistan taking McChrystal’s resignation?

“While some blow off speculation that the general may be replaced as ‘back-home talk,’ the fact remains that they are fighting in this hostile swath of Afghan desert by the general’s design, waging a brand of counterinsurgency campaign that bears his [McChrystal] signature,” Time magazine’s Jason Motlagh reported Wednesday from Marjah, Afghanistan.

Marine Lt. Colonel Brian Christmas, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment, told Motlagh that news of McChrystal’s predicament is, for now, “outside [the] box.”

“However, if changes up the chain of command start to undermine the counterinsurgency strategy that he’s following, he adds, ‘then that becomes a real concern,’ Motlagh wrote.

“Another officer agreed that given the slow progress, ‘any [potential] loss of momentum’ arising from the general’s departure would be “bad for the mission.”

McChrystal incident a ‘learning moment’

Source: McChrystal likely to resign over magazine comments

Washington (CNN) — America’s top military commander in Afghanistan is unlikely to survive the fallout from remarks he made about colleagues in a magazine profile to be published Friday, according to a Pentagon source who has ongoing contacts with the general.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal will likely resign Wednesday, the source said. McChrystal’s fate is expected to hinge on a meeting scheduled Wednesday with President Obama, who was “angry” after reading the general’s remarks in Rolling Stone.

The “magnitude and graveness” of McChrystal’s mistake in conducting the interview for the article were “profound,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said McChrystal had “made a significant mistake and exercised poor judgment.”

McChrystal apologized Tuesday for the profile, in which he and his staff appear to mock top civilian officials, including the vice president. Two defense officials said the general fired a press aide over the article, set to appear in Friday’s edition of Rolling Stone.

“I extend my sincerest apology for this profile. It was a mistake reflecting poor judgment and should never have happened,” McChrystal said in a Pentagon statement. “Throughout my career, I have lived by the principles of personal honor and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard.”

Video: Civilian bosses slammed

Video: McChrystal article author speaks out

Video: Obama: ‘Poor judgment’ from general

Video: Obama ‘angry’ over McChrystal article

McChrystal has been recalled to Washington to explain his actions to the president. He is expected to meet with Obama in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Gibbs said. Gibbs refused to speculate about McChrystal’s fate, but told reporters “all options are on the table.”

Obama, questioned about McChrystal before a Cabinet meeting Tuesday afternoon, said he had not made a decision.

“I think it’s clear that the article in which he and his team appeared showed poor judgment, but I also want to make sure that I talk to him directly before I make that final decision,” he said.

McChrystal is prepared to resign if the president has lost confidence in him, a national security official told CNN. Most of the Pentagon brass, the official said, hopes he will be upbraided by the commander-in-chief but sent back to continue the mission.

The White House will have more to say after Wednesday’s meeting, Gibbs said. He noted, however, that McChrystal did not take part in a teleconference Obama had with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and other top officials on Tuesday.

Several elected officials have strongly criticized McChrystal but deferred to the president on the politically sensitive question of whether the general should keep his position. A couple of key congressmen, however, have openly called for McChrystal’s removal.

In the profile, writer Michael Hastings writes that McChrystal and his staff had imagined ways of dismissing Vice President Joe Biden with a one-liner as they prepared for a question-and-answer session in Paris, France, in April. The general had grown tired of questions about Biden since earlier dismissing a counterterrorism strategy the vice president had offered.

“‘Are you asking about Vice President Biden,’ McChrystal says with a laugh. ‘Who’s that?’”

“‘Biden?’ suggests a top adviser. ‘Did you say: Bite Me?’”

McChrystal does not directly criticize Obama in the article, but Hastings writes that the general and Obama “failed to connect” from the outset. Sources familiar with the meeting said McChrystal thought Obama looked “uncomfortable and intimidated” by the room full of top military officials, according to the article.

Later, McChrystal’s first one-on-one meeting with Obama “was a 10-minute photo op,” Hastings writes, quoting an adviser to McChrystal. “Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going to run his f—ing war, but he didn’t seem very engaged. The Boss (McChrystal) was disappointed.”

The article goes on to paint McChrystal as a man who “has managed to piss off almost everyone with a stake in the conflict,” including U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, special representative to Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke and national security adviser Jim Jones.

Of Eikenberry, who railed against McChrystal’s strategy in Afghanistan in a cable leaked to The New York Times in January, the general is quoted as saying, “‘Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, “I told you so.’”

Hastings writes in the profile that McChrystal has a “special skepticism” for Holbrooke, the official in charge of reintegrating Taliban members into Afghan society and the administration’s point man for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“At one point on his trip to Paris, McChrystal checks his BlackBerry, according to the article. ‘Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke,’ he groans. ‘I don’t even want to open it.’ He clicks on the message and reads the salutation out loud, then stuffs the BlackBerry back in his pocket, not bothering to conceal his annoyance.

“‘Make sure you don’t get any of that on your leg,’ an aide jokes, referring to the e-mail.”

Both Democrats and Republicans have been strongly critical of McChrystal in the wake of the story. House Appropriations Committee chairman David Obey, D-Wisconsin, called McChrystal the latest in a “long list of reckless, renegade generals who haven’t seemed to understand that their role is to implement policy, not design it.”

McChrystal is “contemptuous” of civilian authority and has demonstrated “a bullheaded refusal to take other people’s judgments into consideration.”

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota, became the first member of the Senate Democratic leadership to call for McChrystal to step down, saying that the remarks were “unbelievably inappropriate and just can’t be allowed to stand.”

Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin, D-Michigan, deferred to Obama on the question of a possible McChrystal resignation. He said the controversy was sending a message of “confusion” to troops in the field. I think it has “a negative effect” on the war effort, he said.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, urged a cooling off period before a final decision is rendered on the general. My “impression is that all of us would be best served by just backing off and staying cool and calm and not sort of succumbing to the normal Washington twitter about this for the next 24 hours.”

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Jim Webb of Virginia — also key senators on defense and foreign policy issues — were each strongly critical of McChrystal’s remarks, but noted that the general’s future is a decision for Obama to make.

Karzai weighed in from abroad,urging Obama to keep McChrystal as the U.S. commander in Afghanistan. The government in Kabul believes McChrystal is a man of strong integrity who has a strong understanding of the Afghan people and their culture, Karzai spokesman Waheed Omar said.

A U.S. military official said Tuesday that McChrystal has spoken to Biden, Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and other officials referenced in the story, including Holbrooke, Eikenberry and Jones.

An official at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul said Eikenberry and McChrystal “are both fully committed” to Obama’s Afghan strategy and are working together to implement the plan. “We have seen the article and General McChrystal has already spoken to it,” according to a statement from an embassy official, making reference to McChrystal’s apology.

“I have enormous respect and admiration for President Obama and his national security team, and for the civilian leaders and troops fighting this war, and I remain committed to ensuring its successful outcome,” McChrystal said in the closing to his apology.

Rolling Stone executive editor Eric Bates, however, struck a less optimistic tone during an interview with CNN on Tuesday.

The comments made by McChrystal and other top military aides during the interview were “not off-the-cuff remarks,” he said. They “knew what they were doing when they granted the access.” The story shows “a deep division” and “war within the administration” over strategy in Afghanistan, he contended.

McChrystal and his staff “became aware” that the Rolling Stone article would be controversial before it was published, Hastings said Tuesday. He said he “got word from (McChrystal’s) staff … that there was some concern” about possible fallout from the story.

Obama tapped McChrystal to head the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan in the spring of 2009 shortly after dismissing Gen. David McKiernan.

CNN’s John King, Suzanne Malveaux, Barbara Starr, Dana Bash and Alan Silverleib contributed to this report.

Source: McChrystal likely to resign over magazine comments

Haley makes history in South Carolina

(CNN) — Voters in four states headed to the polls Tuesday, and in one of those states history was made:

South Carolina

South Carolina Republicans made state Rep. Nikki Haley their first female gubernatorial nominee, handing her an easy victory in her primary runoff race against U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett.

Haley just missed out on winning the nomination outright in the June 8 primary, capturing 49 percent of the vote in a four-candidate field. She was short of the 50 percent-plus-one needed to take the nomination.

Once facing long odds for the GOP nomination, Haley rose in the polls thanks in part to endorsements by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

And unsubstantiated allegations by two other Republicans that they had affairs with Haley, who is married with children, most likely helped rather than hurt her campaign. So did a racial slur by a Republican state lawmaker at Haley, who is Indian-American and was raised Sikh, but became a Methodist at age 24.

“The unproven allegations and attacks against Haley actually played right into her message as a new kind of conservative,” said CNN political producer Peter Hamby, who is in South Carolina reporting on the campaign. “In fighting back, she was able to argue that establishment figures in the GOP were playing politics as usual and trying to stop a real reformer from taking charge in Columbia.”

Video: Nasty fight for GOP’s Nikki Haley

Haley will be considered the favorite in the general election against state Sen. Vincent Sheheen, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee. Haley would become the Palmetto state’s first woman governor if elected in November.

There were also runoffs in South Carolina in contests for the House of Representatives and for the state Legislature. State Rep. Tim Scott hopes to become the first black Republican to win election to Congress from South Carolina in a century. He faced off against Paul Thurmond, the son of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond, in a GOP House primary runoff.

Republican Rep. Bob Inglis is hoping he won’t become the third House incumbent to lose a bid for re-election so far this primary season. He grabbed 27 percent of the vote in the primary and faced a runoff against Spartanburg prosecutor Trey Gowdy. Inglis faced criticism for his vote in favor of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, better known as the Wall Street bailout.

North Carolina

In neighboring North Carolina, Secretary of State Elaine Marshall handily won a Democratic Senate primary runoff against former state Sen. Cal Cunningham, who was recruited by national Democrats. Marshall will challenge Republican Sen. Richard Burr in November’s general election.

“Richard Burr doesn’t have the strongest poll numbers, but that may not matter,” said Stuart Rothenberg, publisher and editor of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report. Rothenberg said neither of the Democratic candidates “seems likely to put together the kind of campaign that would defeat Burr.”

Voters in three congressional districts and one state Senate district also cast ballots in runoff contests.

Mississippi

Two Republicans are in a runoff to decide who will face eight-term incumbent Rep. Bennie Thompson in November in Mississippi’s 2nd Congressional District.

Richard Cook, a Jackson-area teacher, finished a single vote ahead of Bill Marcy, a former Chicago, Illinois, police officer, in the state’s June 1 primary, with each getting 35 percent of the vote in a three-candidate field. Cook lost in his 2008 bid to unseat Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, with Thompson getting 69 percent of the vote.

Utah

The fight for the GOP Senate nomination is capturing the spotlight in Utah, and the contest will be another test of the political strength of the Tea Party Express.

The national Tea Party group, which is based in California, is backing and assisting lawyer Mike Lee in the battle to succeed fellow Republican Bob Bennett, who is supporting the other candidate on the ballot, businessman Tim Bridgewater.

Bridgewater and Lee finished first and second, respectively last month at the Utah Republican Party convention, advancing to Tuesday’s primary. Bridgewater and Lee touted themselves as more reliable conservatives than Bennett, who finished third in the voting by delegates, eliminating him from advancing to the primary and ending his chances of re-election for a fourth term. Bennett became the first sitting senator to go down to defeat in a primary season marked by strong anti-incumbent sentiment.

The Tea Party Express, best known for its three national bus tours, is running radio ads supporting Lee. The group recently pumped more than $500,000 into the recent fight for the Republican Senate nomination in Nevada, helping transform ex-state lawmaker Sharron Angle, once considered a long shot, into an easy winner in this month’s primary election.

FreedomWorks also has endorsed Lee, and its volunteers are assisting in get-out-the-vote efforts in Utah. FreedomWorks is a nonprofit conservative organization that helps train volunteer activists and has provided much of the organizational heft behind the Tea Party movement.

Bennett upset many conservatives with his 2007 vote for President Bush’s plan for a pathway to citizenship for some illegal immigrants and his 2008 vote for the federal bailout of banks and financial institutions. The fiscally conservative Club for Growth actively worked to defeat Bennett, as did local Tea Party organizations and Tea Party Express.

The GOP dominates statewide elections in Utah, and the winner of the Republican primary will be considered the overwhelming favorite to win the general election in November.

Haley makes history in South Carolina